For Russian science The 1990s became a period of crisis, the result of which was the lack of demand for scientific developments and low level of innovative activity of domestic enterprises.

The volume of fixed assets for 1990 - 1999 in the scientific and technical sphere decreased by more than three times.

The level of innovation activity (the share of innovation-active enterprises in the total number of them in industry) in 1999 was 6.2 percent. The share of innovative products in the total volume of industrial output in 1999 was 3.5 percent, and the share of innovation costs was 1.06 percent.

One of the most acute problems of science remains the personnel problem. The average age of researchers with a degree has approached retirement age. Every year, only 3.5 thousand young specialists are fixed in science. The decline in the quality parameters of scientific personnel is primarily based on the low level of remuneration in science.

The main goal of the state policy in the field of science in the medium term will be the preservation and development of the accumulated scientific potential by strengthening the staff, improving the mechanisms for financing science.

Particular attention should be paid to supporting basic science and innovation in areas such as maintaining national security, development of the social sphere, solution environmental issues, improvement government controlled.

Reforming the scientific and technical sphere will cover the sphere of science management, institutions, organizations and institutions of the public sector of science. The completion of the restructuring will make it possible to lay the foundations for a new institutional structure of the public sector of science, namely:

to unite state organizations with related topics in large intersectoral structures of the federal level;

ensure closer integration of scientific and educational spheres;

pass part scientific organizations in the jurisdiction of the regions;

corporatize or privatize scientific organizations that are not included in the public sector of science.

The reform of academic science will be aimed at preserving the main core of fundamental science by reducing the management bodies, the number of subordinate organizations and the number of their employees, as well as creating conditions for the adaptation of the academic sector of science to market conditions and attraction of additional sources of financing. It is necessary to take measures to strengthen the integration of academic scientific organizations and educational institutions in order to develop research in priority areas and meet the staffing needs of fundamental science and scientific complexes high-tech industries.

The system of state scientific centers (SSC) needs to be reorganized on the basis of integration with academic science and high school, on the one hand, and production, on the other hand, in order to create competitive science-intensive products based on world-class fundamental and exploratory research.

Immediate task personnel policy in the field of science consists in retaining the talented part of the scientific cadre.

The main measures to attract and retain young people in science in modern conditions associated with the creation of attractive conditions for work, creative and social growth. This implies an increase in wages, further development of support programs for scientific schools, state scholarships.

In the short term, attention should be focused on supporting scientific developments in the following areas:

information technologies and electronics;

production technologies;

So, the development of science and technology is designed to serve as a solution to the problems of the country's socio-economic progress and is one of the highest priorities. Russian Federation.

The basis for the development of science and technology are:

  • scientific and technical complex, which is a set of organizations of various organizational and production forms and forms of ownership, carrying out scientific and technical activities and training of scientists, including highly qualified personnel;
  • fundamental science with recognized world-class scientific achievements, as well as a developed education system;
  • the most important applied research and development, industrial potential, unique production technologies, scientific and technical groundwork;
  • highly qualified staff of scientists and specialists, information infrastructure, logistical and experimental base;
  • experience in concentrating efforts on solving complex scientific, technical and technological problems of national development;
  • rich natural raw materials, developed transport and communication infrastructure.

The most important directions of the state policy in the field of science and technology development are the following.

  • 1. Development of fundamental science, the most important applied research and development.
  • 2. Improvement of state regulation in the field of science and technology development.
  • 3. Formation of the national innovation system.
  • 4. Increasing the efficiency of using the results of scientific and scientific and technical activities.
  • 5. Preservation and development of the personnel potential of the scientific and technical complex.
  • 6. Integration of science and education.
  • 7. Development of international scientific and technical cooperation.

Priority directions of the policy of the Russian Federation in

areas scientific and technological development of the national economy are determined by the Strategy of the Russian Federation in the field of science and innovation development for the period up to 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the Strategy), developed in accordance with the decision of the Government of the Russian Federation and developing the provisions of the Basic Policy of the Russian Federation in the field of science and technology development for the period up to 2010 ... and further perspective, approved by the President of the Russian Federation.

This Strategy is designed to comprehensively and purposefully direct the efforts of the state, private business and civil society institutions to ensure the dynamic development of the Russian Federation in the field of science and innovation. The strategy defines a system of target programs, individual projects and non-program activities that are interconnected in terms of tasks, deadlines and resources. In this regard, the following main tasks stand out:

  • creation of a competitive research and development sector, including conditions for its expanded reproduction;
  • creation of an effective national innovation system;
  • development of institutions for the use and protection of intellectual property rights;
  • modernization of the economy based on technological innovations.

The Strategy proposes a set of specific measures and target indicators for each task. Let's focus on each task and list the activities that seem to be key.

The solution of the first task - the creation of a competitive research and development sector - should first of all radically increase the effectiveness and competitiveness of domestic fundamental and applied science. The Strategy notes special role Russian Academy Sciences (RAS), the entire academic community in determining the priority tasks of fundamental research and their results.

The main activities in this area include the concentration of resources in priority areas that ensure the implementation of the competitive advantages of the Russian research and development sector in the world market; reforming scientific organizations and increasing their capitalization, restructuring the public research and development sector; ensuring the integration of scientific and educational potentials.

The main results of the implementation of these measures will be an increase in the share of extrabudgetary funds in domestic spending on research and development; strengthening the prestige of Russian science, including the influx of young personnel into the scientific field; growth of budget security of workers in the academic sector of science.

The second task is the creation of an effective innovation infrastructure and the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the innovation sphere. It is important to implement measures to create favorable conditions for the development of small innovative businesses and innovative infrastructure, primarily the further development of financial institutions that ensure the continuity of financing business projects at all stages of the innovation cycle, primarily seed and venture technology funds; technological infrastructure, including technology and innovation zones, technology parks, innovation and technology centers, business incubators, engineering centers, technology transfer centers, etc.

The second task is closely related to the third task - the development of institutions for the use and protection of intellectual property rights. The main measures in this area include the improvement of the regulatory framework, in particular the regulatory consolidation of a rational procedure for acquiring rights to the results of scientific and technical activities created at the expense of the budget. Activation innovation activities and the creation of a civilized market for objects of intellectual property are possible only if coordinated systemic changes and additions are made to the regulatory legal acts of various industries aimed at stimulating innovation.

The main results of solving the second and third tasks will be an increase in patent activity, capitalization scientific results; strengthening the role of small and medium-sized businesses in the field of science and innovation; a significant expansion of the scope of activities of funds that make direct and venture investments in companies in high-tech sectors.

The fourth task is the modernization of the economy based on technological innovations. On the one hand, the solution of this problem involves the technological modernization of economic sectors based on advanced technologies and integration with world technological complexes in the interests of ensuring global competitiveness and forming in the future an innovation market for the Russian research and development sector. The accelerated modernization of industries is an imperative, it is necessary to promote all its forms: the development of corporate R&D; import of advanced technologies; orders to the Russian specialized research and development sector, primarily within the framework of public-private partnerships. It is necessary to bring to the potential consumer information about the ongoing research work of the public sector of science, to promote the participation of business in the selection of technological priorities, to develop technical regulation measures, a policy of long-term contracts in the framework of public procurement, including defense orders, to coordinate plans for the technological modernization of state corporations.

The most important direction is to stimulate demand in the business sector for innovation. Attribution to the cost of corporate R&D expenses is one of the incentive measures. Further development of tax instruments to stimulate innovation, including on the basis of advanced foreign experience, is of fundamental importance for the development of this area of ​​innovation.

On the other hand, solving the problem of modernizing the economy on the basis of technological innovations provides for the formation and implementation of national priorities for technological development within the framework of sectoral targeted programs of a technological profile. Market orientation is relevant here; developed system of public-private partnership; support for regional innovation clusters.

The proposals of the Strategy are based on the amount of funding for civilian research and development, determined at joint meetings of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, the Presidium of the State Council of the Russian Federation and the Council under the President of the Russian Federation on Science and High Technologies, and provide for the necessary expenses to support the innovation infrastructure.

The main principles of financing the implementation of the Strategy are the outpacing growth of budget expenditures on fundamental research as an unconditional obligation of the state and the development of key elements of the innovation infrastructure. In relation to applied developments in general, taking into account all sources of funding for the activities of the Strategy, a significant proportion of the funds will go to the implementation of national priorities for technological development.

Relevant activities and resources are defined in the Strategy for the period up to 2010, but the effects from the implementation of the Strategy are of a longer-term nature, and therefore the Strategy contains estimates for the period up to 2015. The most important conditions for the implementation of strategic priorities are Firstly, a steady increase in domestic spending on research and development in the case of the implementation of the Strategy with an increase in the share of extrabudgetary funds in these costs and the share of the sector higher education; secondly, ensuring the influx of young personnel into the field of science, increasing the share of publications by Russian authors in leading scientific journals; thirdly, dynamic growth specific gravity organizations carrying out technological innovations, as well as an increase in the share of innovative industrial products in the total volume of its sales. At the same time, these indicators are expected to receive values ​​that are typical for foreign countries with developed innovation systems.

The approach proposed in the Strategy for solving the systemic problem of the development of national science and technology will allow:

  • 1) create a basis for sustainable economic growth in the medium and long term;
  • 2) create conditions for growth in all sectors of the economy that use the results of intellectual activity;
  • 3) demonstrate the possibilities of the national economy based on knowledge using the example of specific projects and programs;
  • 4) improve the quality of "human capital".

Innovative activity carried out in the innovation management system "state - society - science - technology - economics - education" includes a wide range of work both in the field of state innovation policy, and on the creation and development of science-intensive and resource-saving technologies, the effective use of acquired licenses , know-how, etc. These relationships play a system-forming role, which contributes to the impact on the development of innovation and its effectiveness. The possibility of investment activity is determined by a set of direct and feedback links between various stages of the innovation cycle, producers and consumers of knowledge, organizations, the market, the state, etc., both within national boundaries and on a global scale.

In the innovation sector of the domestic economy, there is still no necessary “critical mass” of funding from various sources, “Private investment in Russia is only 0.5 percent of GDP, and state spending on science and innovation (according to various estimates) is 1.5 to 2 percent . This is very little. In China, private investment is as much as 8 percent of GDP. In the US, it is 5 percent of GDP, and total spending on innovation exceeds 10 percent.” On the other hand, 50 percent of the total investment in Russia goes to the raw materials industry, while it is necessary that these 50 percent or 90 billion dollars a year go to innovation.

There is a disproportion between fundamental, applied research and development, there is no sufficient infrastructure and stable links between the main links of the innovation system - higher education institutions, scientific organizations, small innovative organizations (SIOs) and large companies.

At present, Russia is inferior to most developed countries in terms of both innovation activity and technological development in general. This statement can be illustrated by the data in Table. 2.1, which characterizes the level of costs for research and development in Russia and a number of foreign countries.

Table 2.1.

Expenses for research and development in Russia and foreign countries, 2002

million dollars

In counting

population,

million dollars

Including from the state budget

of which for defense R&D, %

Great Britain

Germany

Finland

2003. - 198 s sweat.

Source: Science of Russia in numbers: 2003. Stat. Sat. -M.: TsISN, 2003. - 198s.

Purchasing power parity of national currencies.

The share of industry in the financing of Russian science today is 20.7% (in the USA - 68.5%, in Sweden - 67.7%, in Japan - 72.6%). Surpassing developed countries in terms of the number of scientists (138 people employed in research and development per 10 thousand employed in the economy, while in the US this figure is 86 people, and in the EU on average 65 people), Russia is last years significantly behind them in terms of technological development. At present, seven highly developed countries account for about 80-90% of science-intensive products and almost all of their exports. The share of Russia is only 0.3 %. The G7 countries have 46 out of 50 macrotechnologies available in the world. Of these technologies, 22 are controlled by the US, 8-10 by Germany, 7 by Japan, 3-5 each by the UK and France, and 1 each by Sweden, Norway, Italy and Switzerland. Russia currently retains control over only one (according to some estimates - two: the production of nuclear energy and space exploration) macro-technologies.

The deepening technological lag behind advanced industrial and new industrial countries is also manifested in the fact that in recent years Russia has a negative balance in technology trade with foreign countries (Table 2.2.). A positive balance is observed in trade with third world countries, or with the CIS countries, often acquiring technologies that lag behind the world level.

Table 2.2.

Russian technology trade with foreign countries in 2002

East: Science of Russia in numbers: 2003.

The structure of technology trade transactions is dominated by engineering services and R&D results, which are the most difficult to commercialize. A positive balance was noted only in the category of patents for inventions, which indicates that Russia retains scientific priority in a number of areas (Table 2.3.).

Table 2.3

Russia's technology trade with foreign countries by category of agreements in 2002

agreements

price

subject of the agreement, million rubles

agreements

price

subject of the agreement, million rubles

Patents for inventions

Non-patent inventions

Patent licenses

Trademarks

industrial designs

Engineering Services

Scientific research

Source: Science of Russia in numbers: 2003.

Russian statistics show that the share of scientific research in the export of technologies is expanding, and the share of intellectual property (hereinafter referred to as IP) in their import is increasing. Thus, the profile of a supplier of ideas (i.e., figuratively speaking, “intellectual raw materials”) and a consumer of ready-made technologies is becoming characteristic of Russia in the global market.

The presence of Russia in the international market of science-intensive products is very insignificant: its share is, according to various estimates, from 0.35 to 1%. This is lower than the indicators not only of the developed countries of the world, but also of the developing countries of Asia. In the structure of trade turnover, the share of agreements, the subjects of which were patents, patent licenses and trademarks, accounts for no more than 2% of exports and 10% of imports of technologies. If we talk about the competitiveness of the Russian research and development sector in the global market, it should be noted that we mainly occupy the sector of a knowledge provider, while the business sector shows a demand for ready-made technologies.

If you pay attention to the age structure of the technologies used (Fig. 2.1.), then mechanical engineering is the only industry in which the share of new and latest technologies exceeds 60%. In general, the share of obsolete and outdated technologies in industry is high.

Figure 2.1. Return structure used in industry

technologies

In this case, the inevitable conclusion is that the advanced technologies created in the country often do not find application in industry, and are not exported to industrialized countries, which reduces both the technological potential and the competitiveness of the economy as a whole.

A quote from an article by Professor V. M. Simchera would be appropriate here: In the field of innovation, we have no competition because there is no such competition between manufacturers. Moreover, there is no mention of it between the same imported and domestic products. Both autonomous, non-interchangeable, and, therefore, non-competitive markets for production, products, goods, services, investments, and innovations will coexist in Russia as parallel for a long time to come. 49% of Russian companies do not conduct any innovative activity at all, while there are practically no organizations in the world that would not specifically engage in it.

In a competitive environment, each organization is forced and, therefore, obliged to engage in innovative activities. An increase in competition by 1% means an increase in innovation activity by 3%. Competition pushes innovation forward, it is their locomotive. Since half of the domestic organizations can produce and sell products without any competitors, the situation is developing. Why invent something, change, break? If you don't want to invent - lag behind!

One of the most profitable and almost closed areas of entrepreneurship is the technology business. As practice shows, the introduction of new technologies into production makes it possible to make a qualitative breakthrough in the world market of goods and services. But what if in our country 90% of domestic innovations have a payback period of more than 10 years, the world norm is 2.5 years?

The demand of business entities for research and development in Russia is still low. But according to Minister A. Fursenko, even this demand is met by Russian scientific organizations only half. During 2001-2003. the share of technology imports in the volume of costs for their acquisition (at own expense) was approximately 46%. This suggests that there are reserves for expanding demand for domestic research and development even now. But the realization of demand is possible only with a significant increase in the quality of domestic developments in the form of technologies ready for production.

In the 1980s-1990s. in developed countries, the growth rates of knowledge-intensive industries were on average 1.5-2 times higher than in industry as a whole, and this indicates that in developed countries the high-tech complex determines economic growth and “pulls” the rest of the economy with it , forcing her to adapt to high technology.

The group of high-tech industries with "high-level" technologies usually includes industries that ensure the release of a science-intensive product designed for the mass consumer. There are four high-tech industries in OECD countries: aerospace, computers and office equipment, electronics and communications equipment, and pharmaceuticals. World experience convinces us that there is no alternative to the innovative way of development. The creation, introduction and wide distribution of new products, services, technological processes are becoming key factors in the growth of production volumes, employment, investment, foreign trade turnover, improving product quality, saving labor and material costs, improving the organization of production and increasing its efficiency. All this predetermines the competitiveness of organizations and their products in the domestic and world markets, improves the socio-economic situation in the country. That is why in the XXI century. the most important condition for the accelerated progress of socio-economic development is an effective innovation policy, since a dynamic socio-economic economic development many countries of the world began to be finally based solely on innovations, the consequences of which took on a strategically important character. And in the face of change, innovation is especially in demand.

The basis of the status of the countries of the world community is no longer the power of the armed forces, economic indicators (poor and rich countries, industrial and agricultural, etc.), but the ability to produce and implement high technologies. From this point of view, countries are divided into raw materials, commodity-producing, technology-producing and scientific knowledge-producing and high-tech countries.

The last group includes countries that are simultaneously world economic, technological, scientific and military leaders. This complex of industries represents a frontier strategy, since the development and state support of high technologies are becoming the most urgent not only economic, but also political task.

The innovative ability of the country's economy is determined by the ability to create and distribute innovations in all its areas. The specificity of innovations as a commodity is such that, on the one hand, the need for them is formed under the influence of supply and demand, and on the other hand, the need for it arises in a competitive environment. Here it would be appropriate to recall that in the Japanese innovation system, in 80 percent of the case, business raises questions.

Of particular importance in Russia is the creation of an atmosphere that stimulates the search for and development of new technologies. The upcoming entry of Russia into the WTO poses a dilemma for our country: either open the Russian market for goods from other WTO countries, curtail domestic production and become a real market for any products of other foreign countries - WTO members, or already now focus on the introduction of new technologies and the production of high-tech goods competitive on the world market . WTO rules prohibit direct state support for industries and companies, but in practice such support is carried out using hidden forms of subsidies. There is no such experience in Russia and we can ruin own production or fall under various kinds of sanctions. It is on how the science-intensive subjects of the Federation will form and implement their regional policy in the field of innovation, use their scientific and industrial potential, which will largely determine which path the development of the economic potential of all of Russia will take.

For example, let's give the main directions of fundamental and complex applied research in the field of architecture, urban planning, construction science and construction production of the RAASN, which boil down to solving five main complex problems:

Implementation of the program "Housing in Russia", including the development of the concept of resettlement, new basic architectural and construction solutions for residential buildings and building structure, efficient and energy-efficient structural and engineering systems;

Reconstruction of the existing production potential in order to bring it in line with the requirements of a market economy;

Ecological resuscitation of the humanized environment;

Ensuring the reliability of existing and newly created facilities, taking into account natural and man-made impacts;

Development of design solutions for buildings and structures of a new generation that meet social, aesthetic and functional requirements, including dynamically developing technologies, industrial production and ensure minimal energy consumption during operation.

As studies by scientists from the Russian Academy of Architecture and Building Sciences (RAACS) have shown, a feature of the use of innovations in the construction industry is the high risk of investing compared to other industries. The risk manifests itself not only in the process of developing new materials and technologies with predetermined properties, but also in the sale of finished products - buildings and structures for various purposes.

One cannot but agree with Minister A. Fursenko that Russia's global competitiveness, based on domestic technologies, is achievable with a concentration of efforts that contribute to the retention and development of positions where we are strong today - in the creation of weapons, the nuclear and space industries, in information technology , nanoindustry, in the development of new materials and some other areas. To this end, large federal target programs with the participation of business should be created. Their task is to use the potential of the research and development sector to effectively implement national technological development priorities, while at the same time turning this sector into a manufacturing industry of the “new economy”.

On the other hand, it is impossible not to notice that in order to implement the innovative programs necessary for our country, the current volume and current format of investment growth is not enough, the professor is convinced. Both in essence and in scale, this today requires a completely different rethought format, a new generation of them. In this rethought format, the country, in a new calculation, will require a trillion or more US dollars of investment per year. At the same time, we emphasize that new generation investments are focused primarily, and not in the residual version, on innovation.

Today our country has 180 billion dollars a year for all investments. Moreover, half of them, as you know, are largely wasted in the raw materials industries, 16 percent settled in real estate, 20 percent - in individual buildings. Only 14 percent remain, of which 2 for science and innovation and only 0.7 percent for engineering.

The question is, is it possible, on such a truncated base, with 2.7 percent of the total increase in investments, to seriously innovate, and at the same time also claim an elite place in the world tabloids of investment ranks? Of course not. In order to change the situation, it is necessary not only to multiply, but by orders of magnitude (by orders of magnitude, that means 10, 100 times) to increase innovative investments, bringing them closer in volume to world levels. Is it possible to do this today? Obviously not. And therefore, naturally, we need to change the country, to improve effective management in the country instead of the current inefficient one, which is not done overnight.

Which exit? We need selection, including, probably, first of all, the innovations themselves. We need a factorial analysis of them according to the criterion of effectiveness. And not to talk about “everything and everything”, but to build some kind of small program that is possible for Russia, and hit on this point. Then we will start moving forward.

The experience of countries with developed economies shows that they finance only developments in which there is a tandem "research institution - small innovative organization" and a real prospect of creating a science-intensive product and selling it on the market. It is advisable to apply a similar method in our country, especially since there are already sprouts of such a trend, bringing positive results in the field of commercialization of new technologies. Small innovative business in our conditions is exactly the tool that can make a qualitative breakthrough in the introduction of new technologies.

Using foreign experience, as domestic experts testify, Russia could well compete for 17 macro technologies out of those 50-55 that determine the potential of developed countries. Abroad, the production of science-intensive products is provided by only 50-55 macrotechnologies. The seven most developed countries, possessing 46 macrotechnologies, hold 80% of this market. The United States annually receives about 700 billion dollars from the export of science-intensive products, Germany - 530, Japan - 400 billion dollars. Today, the question is: either the reduction in the economic, industrial and production potential of the country will be compensated at the advanced scientific, technical, technological level, which will require a sharp increase in innovation activity, or the country will hopelessly lag behind not only in terms of output, but also in terms of its technological capabilities. , will lag behind forever in all types of its development from highly developed countries.

Back in 2004, during a joint meeting of the Presidium of the State Council and the Security Council of the Russian Federation, the President of Russia stated that the main task in the economic sphere is to remove our country from the oil needle and finally recreate an industry that is competitive on the world market, and this can be done only for technology commercialization account. It is necessary to get rid of obsolete and obsolete non-competitive industries and create an economic environment that is receptive to both innovation and new technologies. An environment that will allow Russia to take its rightful place in the global market. But in 2008 at an expanded meeting of the State Council of the Russian Federation (February 8, 2008), the president admitted that Russia "has not managed to get away from the energy and raw material development scenario", which threatens to "secure our role as a raw materials appendage of the world economy", and that if "we continue to act like this ”, then “we will come to a deadlock”, “we will not be able to ensure either the security of the country or its normal development”, “we will endanger its very existence” .

The creation of a national innovation system is put forward among the top priorities of socio-economic policy Russian state, i.e. we are talking on the modernization of the economy based on innovation. And to achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve a number of major tasks, one of which is to sharply increase the innovation capacity of the economy and stimulate innovation. The main goals of the state innovation policy should be the creation of economic, legal and organizational conditions for innovation, ensuring the growth of competitiveness industrial policy and solving problems of socio-economic development.

To this end, the “super-ambitious” task of “Russia becoming one of the world’s technological leaders” was set (which is coupled with no less ambitious goal setting of “at least a fourfold increase” in the productivity of social labor and bringing the share of the “middle class” in the population to 60-70%) .4

Any drafted plan for the implementation of an important state problem should include not only the development of a concept or program in this area, but also imply an answer to the question: what is the outcome? But if we talk about the program for the development of science and technology, then it does not mean generalized formulations, but specific definitions and measures: what do we plan to allocate financial resources for and what return will we get for the country's budget as a result of the sale of a particular science-intensive product.

Currently, there are more than 400 normative acts of state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, to some extent using the concepts of innovation and innovation activity, but in their own interpretation. This points to the need for a unifying, consolidating federal law on innovation.

Particular emphasis in the development of science and stimulation of innovation was made by Federal Law No. 122-FZ of August 22, 2004, which amended more than 150 federal laws. In particular, his Art. 80 canceled the existing R&D financing scheme in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, i.e., now the financing of fundamental science is carried out only from the federal budget. And this means that at the legislative level there has been a delimitation of powers in this area: the federal center will finance fundamental research and exercise control over the targeted use of funds.

Budget allocations for fundamental research are based on two main principles:

First principle consists in the concentration of federal budget resources to finance R&D in key areas, which means:

Expanded reproduction of fundamental knowledge; increasing the level of "human capital" - one of the main competitive advantages of Russia;

Implementation of applied developments in a limited number of priority areas to ensure their competitiveness, including increasing the capitalization of the results obtained;

Creation of an innovative infrastructure that ensures the transformation of knowledge into a market product for the implementation of national technological development priorities.

Second principle– use of the mechanism of public-private partnership. It is assumed that part of applied developments and the creation of innovative infrastructure should be carried out with the participation of business, and technological modernization should be carried out mainly by business itself.

But Russia's transition to an innovative economy, and without it the country has no future, is not possible without an effective state policy in the field of science and innovation development. It should be noted that a strategy has been developed to comprehensively and purposefully direct the efforts of the state, private business and civil society institutions to ensure the dynamic development of the Russian Federation in the field of science and innovation for the period up to 2010 and beyond.

The purpose of the Strategy is to resolve the systemic contradiction - the pace of development and the structure of the Russian research and development sector do not meet the needs of national security and the growing demand from the business sector for advanced technologies.

The strategy defines a system of target programs, individual projects and non-program activities that are interconnected in terms of tasks, deadlines and resources.

In this regard, the following main tasks stand out:

Creation of a competitive research and development sector, including conditions for its expanded reproduction;

Creation of an effective national innovation system;

Development of institutions for the use and protection of IP rights;

Modernization of the economy based on technological innovations.

The Strategy proposes a set of specific measures and target indicators for each task. Let's dwell on each task and list the activities that, according to Minister A. Fursenko, are key.

The solution of the first task should first of all radically increase the effectiveness and competitiveness of the research and development sector.

The Strategy notes the special role of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), the entire academic community in determining the priority tasks of fundamental research. However, in our opinion, the responsibility for the development of fundamental science, ensuring the effectiveness of budget spending should be meaningful. It is necessary to vigorously implement the program adopted by the Interdepartmental Commission on Science and Innovation Policy to modernize the functions, structure and funding mechanisms of the academic sector of science. First of all, the transition since 2006 from cost management to results management in the field of fundamental science.

The main activities include:

Concentration of resources in priority areas that ensure the realization of the competitive advantages of the Russian research and development sector in the world market;

Reforming scientific organizations and increasing their capitalization, restructuring the public research and development sector;

Ensuring the integration of scientific and educational potentials.

The main results of the implementation of these measures will be:

Increasing the share of extrabudgetary funds in domestic spending on research and development;

Strengthening the prestige of Russian science, including the influx of young personnel into the scientific field;

Growth of budget security of workers in the academic sector of science: in 2008 not less than 750 thousand rubles. per person per year (at the same time, the average monthly salary in the academic sector should be at least 30 thousand rubles). Speaking about this sector of science, one should keep in mind not only RAS institutes, but also other organizations active in fundamental research.

The second task is to create an effective innovation infrastructure and development of small and middle entrepreneurship in innovation sphere.

It is important to implement measures to create favorable conditions for the development of small innovative businesses and innovative infrastructure, primarily the further development of:

Financial institutions that ensure the continuity of financing of business projects at all stages of the innovation cycle, primarily seed and venture technology funds;

Technological infrastructure, including technology and innovation zones, technology parks, innovation and technology centers, business incubators, engineering centers, technology transfer centers, etc.;

The third task is closely related to the second one – the development of institutions for the use and protection of IP rights.

The main measures in this area include the improvement of the regulatory framework, in particular the regulatory consolidation of a rational procedure for acquiring rights to the results of scientific and technical activities (hereinafter referred to as RNTD), created at the expense of the budget. At the same time, it should be noted that there is already movement in this direction - the Government of the Russian Federation recently approved the Regulation on securing and transferring to business entities the rights to R&D received at the expense of the federal budget. However, the intensification of innovation activity and the creation of a civilized market for IP objects will only be possible if coordinated systemic changes and additions are made to the regulatory legal acts of various industries aimed at stimulating innovation activity.

The main results of solving the second and third tasks will be:

Increasing patent activity, capitalization of scientific results;

Strengthening the role of small and medium-sized businesses in the field of science and innovation;

A significant expansion of the scope of activities of funds that make direct and venture capital investments in companies in high-tech sectors.

The fourth task is the modernization of the economy based on technological innovations. On the one hand, this is the technological modernization of economic sectors based on advanced technologies and integration with world technological complexes in the interests of ensuring global competitiveness and forming in the future an innovation market for the Russian research and development sector. Accelerated modernization of industries is an imperative, it is necessary to promote all its forms: the development of corporate R&D; import of advanced technologies; orders to the Russian specialized research and development sector, primarily within the framework of public-private partnerships. It is necessary to bring to the potential consumer information about the ongoing research work of the public sector of science, to promote the participation of business in the selection of technological priorities, to develop technical regulation measures, a policy of long-term contracts in the framework of public procurement, including defense orders, to coordinate plans for the technological modernization of state corporations.

The most important direction is to stimulate demand in the business sector for innovation. Attribution to the cost of R&D expenses of companies is one of the incentive measures. In this regard, the adopted tax innovations that came into effect in 2006 are topical. Further development of tax instruments to stimulate innovation, including on the basis of advanced foreign experience, is of fundamental importance.

On the other hand, this is the formation and implementation of national priorities for technological development within the framework of sectoral targeted programs of a technological profile. The following are relevant here: market orientation, a developed system of public-private partnerships, and support for regional innovation clusters. Search promising directions, including within the framework of the proven mechanism of "megaprojects", which has been repeatedly reported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Now there is a transition to the implementation of large-scale investment projects.

Within the framework of projects (the implementation period is three to five years), a full innovation cycle is carried out. Currently, the Russian Ministry of Education and Science is financing nine projects, six of them since 2003, the rest since the end of 2004. The volume of budget financing is 2,760 million rubles, including in 2005 - 939 million rubles, at the expense of off-budget financing - 3,310 million rubles, including in 2005 - 1,172.5 million rubles.

The implementation of the proposed measures will make it possible to achieve an increase in innovative activity in the economy, an increase in the share of innovative products both in the total volume of sales of industrial products and in their exports.

The basis for clarifying the activities of the existing federal target programs of a technological profile and the formation of new targeted technological programs could be two basic wide-ranging technological programs:

1) Program for the development of scientific and technological base;

2) Dual Use Technology Transfer Program.

With regard to the Program for the Development of the Scientific and Technological Base, the Minister of Education and Science A. Fursenko noted the following. Since 2005, the Ministry has been implementing a new version of the Federal Center for Science and Technology "Research and development in priority areas of science and technology" for 2002-2006. Within the framework of this Program, resources are concentrated in six priority areas, the development of which is aimed at achieving a multiplier effect in the sectors of the economy.

The implementation of this program has made it possible to achieve the following qualitative results:

A system for determining priorities for state support in the scientific and technological sphere has been formed and the consolidation of federal budget funds in these areas has been ensured;

Support mechanisms worked out innovative projects at the stages of the innovation cycle "knowledge generation - development and commercialization of technologies";

An organizational system has been created to ensure the coordination of the interests of the state, private business and science in the implementation of technological development priorities, including a significant attraction of extrabudgetary funds (up to 50% for complex innovative projects).

These mechanisms and tools should be used in the basic program in the field of science and innovation "Scientific and Technological Base of Russia" for 2007-2012, which is currently being developed, thus ensuring the continuity and logical development of programs.

At the same time, when implementing the new program, it is planned to ensure a shift in emphasis in a number of areas, including:

Strengthen the direct participation of business in the specification of national priorities for technological development and the selection of the most effective scientific organizations to carry out the relevant R&D;

Actively stimulate sustainable links between the elements of the innovation system, including the integration of universities, small scientific organizations into the system of scientific and technical relations;

Strengthen support for the formation of non-state scientific organizations, including through the development of technology-innovative special economic zones and technology parks.

The proposals of the Strategy are based on the volumes of funding for research and development for civil purposes, determined at a joint meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, the Presidium of the State Council of the Russian Federation and the Council under the President of the Russian Federation on Science and High Technologies on March 20, 2002 for the period up to 2010, and also provide for the necessary costs to support the innovation infrastructure. In the mentioned document, two approaches to financing were proposed: at current prices and as a share of the expenditure side of the budget. The most rational seems to be an intermediate scenario that combines conservatism in increasing budget expenditures and the necessary resource provision for a balanced solution to at least the key objectives of this Strategy.

The main principles of financing the implementation of the Strategy are the outpacing growth of budget expenditures on fundamental research as an unconditional obligation of the state and the development of key elements of the innovation infrastructure.

With regard to applied developments in general, taking into account all sources of funding for the activities of the Strategy, a significant proportion of funds will go to the implementation of national priorities for technological development.

The implementation of the strategy in the field of development of science and innovation involves two stages: the first - 2006-2007; the second - 2008 - 2010.

The first stage (2006 - 2007) is the development of the research and development sector, the reform of the public sector of science, the harmonization and development of institutions that affect innovation and investment climate. It is also necessary to complete institutional changes in the field of using the results of intellectual activity.

The key objectives of the second stage (2008-2010) are creation of a modern holistic innovation system, active positioning of the domestic research and development sector in the global economy, implementation of large projects on national priorities of technological development within the framework of public-private partnership.

Economic growth is the objective goal of the economic policy of all countries. For economic policy, it means efforts aimed at increasing labor productivity through the implementation of the results of scientific and technical progress. At the beginning of the XXI century. the world economy is actively forming a new paradigm of scientific and technological development, the components of which are the growing relationship between capital markets and new technologies, the rapid development of the "knowledge economy", the strengthening of the social orientation of new technologies, the global nature of the creation and use of knowledge, technologies, products, services 1 development these areas of research and promotes a holistic innovation system (CIS) as a set of interrelated organizations (structures) engaged in production and commercialization scientific knowledge and technologies of small and large companies, universities, laboratories, technology parks and incubators, as a complex of legal, financial and social institutions that ensure innovation processes and have strong national roots, traditions, political and cultural characteristics. The general methodological principles of the CIS concept are following the ideas of J. Schumpeter on competition based on innovation in corporations as the main factor in economic dynamics, recognizing the special role of knowledge in economic development, and analyzing the institutional context of innovation activity as a factor that directly affects its content and structure. When knowledge becomes an economic resource, and information technology has completely changed the global economic system, this is precisely the approach to studying innovation processes becomes fundamentally important.

It should be noted that the strategy defines activities and resources for the period up to 2010, but the effects of the implementation. The strategies are of a longer-term nature, therefore the Strategy contains estimates for the period up to 2015.

First– a steady increase in domestic spending on research and development in the case of the implementation of the Strategy with an increase in the share of extrabudgetary funds in these costs and the share of the higher education sector.

Second– ensuring the influx of young personnel into the field of science, increasing the share of Russian authors of publications in leading scientific journals.

Third– dynamic growth in the share of organizations engaged in technological innovation, as well as the share of innovative industrial products in the total volume of its sales. At the same time, these indicators are expected to receive values ​​that are typical for foreign countries with developed innovation systems.

The approach proposed in the Strategy to solve the systemic problem will allow:

Create a basis for sustainable economic growth in the medium and long term;

Create conditions for growth in all sectors of the economy that use the results of intellectual activity;

Demonstrate the possibilities of the knowledge-based economy, using the example of specific projects and programs,

Improve the quality of "human capital".

To achieve a high level of efficiency in the use of knowledge, the state policy of modernizing the economy based on innovation should include the implementation of the following measures: promoting the promotion of large-scale use of the world's wealth of knowledge in all areas of the national economy through the development and introduction of economic incentives, as well as the formation of an effective institutional environment; expanding the volume of the domestic market for unrealized technologies and increasing effective demand for the results of domestic R&D; stimulation of the comprehensive development of the intellectual potential of the individual, providing for the active influence of the state at all stages of the formation of human capital; improvement of the system of indirect methods of state influence on the process of development of the high-tech production sector, on the application at the first stages of the necessary arsenal of protectionist measures in order to support it in the foreign market; creation of a stable functioning organizational and legal environment for generating a highly productive knowledge resource, which means solving existing problems in the education and science system and completing the formation of effective systems for the protection and enforcement of IP rights.

In 2008, and in presidential and government documents, the task of Russia's entry into the ranks of the world's technological leaders is set.

In the goal-setting fragments of the new version of the draft government "Concept ...", designed for the period up to 2020, as well as in the "Basic parameters for the forecast of the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020-2030", prepared by the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, it is said about the formation of a national innovation system and a powerful high-tech complex, the diversification of the economy and the creation of conditions for the realization of the creative potential of the individual, the deployment of an effective, result-oriented social infrastructure. The authors of the “Concept...” write that “a new technological wave based on nano- and biotechnologies, the dynamic growth of the world market for high-tech goods and services open up new opportunities for Russia for a technological breakthrough... Russian exports of these products should grow by 15–20 % per year and reach at least 80-100 billion US dollars by the turn of 2020 (about 1% of the world market compared to 0.2% at present).

Economic growth is planned to be achieved through scientific and technological progress and “the share of industrial enterprises implementing technological innovations should increase to 40-50% (2005 - 9.3%), the share of innovative products in industrial output - up to 25- 35% (2005 - 2.5%)", and "the share of the high-tech sector and the knowledge economy in GDP should be at least 17-20% (2006 - 10.5%)".

According to the “innovative” scenario outlined in the “Key Forecast Parameters…”, the share of the innovation sector in value added doubles (from 10.5 to 18.5%) with the corresponding dynamics of the oil and gas sector (it decreases from 19.6 to 11.8 %).

As we can see, the Government of the Russian Federation has set tasks for the near future and determined the target parameters for the formation of an innovative economy. Since the analysis of the above documents is the task set by the authors of this book (especially since a detailed analysis was given by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences S.Yu. Glazyev, head of the Center for Structural Transformations of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Economics A.I. Amosov, etc.) is not included, it is advisable to dwell on the role of small innovative entrepreneurship in the development of the national economy of Russia on an innovative path of development.

There are not many specialists who disagree with the fact that the success of the state innovation policy will largely depend on the state and level of development of small business in the innovation sphere.

The world experience of countries with developed market economies shows that small innovative entrepreneurship is the basis for the formation of new markets and is a channel for the transfer of knowledge and technology, which makes a significant contribution to the transformation of the structure of various sectors of the economy. For example, it is small innovative organizations (SIOs) in such sectors as bio- and information technologies that have become the main suppliers of new products and industries in the EU countries. Speech by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin at a meeting of the boards of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation on March 19, 2004. – Access mode www.minfin.ru.

Asaul, A.N. Formation of entrepreneurial activity of the globalization of the economy // Nauch. tr. International Union of Economists and the Free Economic Society of Russia. - M.-SPb.: Free Economic Society. T.10. -2002.; Asaul, A.N. Globalization of the economy // Globalization, the new economy and environment. Problems of Society and business and business on the way to sustainable development. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Russian Society for Ecological Economics St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia 2005. - St. Petersburg. university. -2005.

Asaul, A.N. Problems and trends in the development of small business at the regional level / A.N. Asaul, I. V. Denisova // Nauch. tr. International Union of Economists and the Free Economic Society of Russia. - M.-SPb. Free Economic Society. T.11. -2002.; Strategy of the Russian Federation in the field of development of science and innovations for the period up to 2010 (hereinafter - the Strategy). This document was developed in accordance with the decision of the Government of the Russian Federation, and develops the provisions of the Basic Policy of the Russian Federation in the field of science and technology development for the period up to 2010 and beyond (approved by the President of the Russian Federation on March 30, 2002 No. Pr-576).

The implementation of the most important innovative projects of national importance is based on shared financing - at the expense of the federal target scientific and technical program (FTsNTP) "Research and development in priority areas of science and technology" for 2002-2006. funded scientific research and experimental design, and from extrabudgetary sources - the development of R&D results in production and production.

The concept of long-term socio-economic development of the Russian Federation - Access mode - www.economy.qov.ru.; “The main parameters of the forecast for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020-2050. – Access mode – http://www.apn.ru/publications/article19384.htm.

Along with this main scenario, the above document highlights the "inertial" and "energy-raw material" scenarios. The main macrodynamic indicators that distinguish the “inertial”, “energy-raw material” and “innovative” options for possible evolution are as follows: GDP growth (in 2020 against 2006) - 1.8, 2.2 and 2.4 times, respectively; investment growth - 2.3, 4.0 and 4.4 times (moreover, the shares of investments in the high-tech sector by 2020 are projected at the level of 12, 17 and 20%, respectively); labor productivity growth - 1.9, 2.4 and 2.6 times.

Glazyev, S.Yu. On the strategy and concept of the socio-economic development of Russia until 2020. – Access mode – www. qlazev.ru.

Amosov A. Issues of transition to an innovative type of reproduction / The Economist. - 2008. - No. 5. - P. 23-32.

Previous

December 31, 2019 , National project "Science" The procedure for granting grants for updating the instrumentation base of scientific organizations has been established Decree of December 27, 2019 No. 1875. The decision made will make it possible to ensure the renewal of the instrument base of the leading organizations performing research and development within the framework of the federal project "Development of an advanced infrastructure for research and development in the Russian Federation" of the national project "Science".

December 31, 2019 , National project "Science" The procedure for granting grants for conducting large-scale scientific projects world class Decree of December 30, 2019 No. 1941. The decisions made will contribute to the implementation of at least five large-scale world-class scientific projects that ensure the solution of key research tasks on the global scientific agenda, aimed at obtaining new fundamental knowledge necessary for the long-term development of the country.

December 31, 2019 , National project "Science" The procedure for granting grants for major scientific projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development has been established Decree of December 27, 2019 No. 1902. The decisions taken will help ensure Russia's presence among the top five countries in the world that conduct research and development in areas determined by the priorities of scientific and technological development.

December 26, 2019 , A decision was made to create an innovative scientific and technological center "Valley of Mendeleev" Resolution dated December 24, 2019 No. 1805, order dated December 24, 2019 No. 3153-r. The Center is being created in order to implement the priorities of the scientific and technological development of Russia, to increase investment attractiveness areas of research and development.

December 24, 2019 , Tatyana Golikova held the first meeting of the Council for State Support for the Creation and Development of World-Class Research Centers The list of priority areas for which the centers will be created was discussed, as well as the procedure for the competitive selection of winners for grants and the criteria for evaluating participants in the competition.

December 5, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Tatyana Golikova held a meeting of the organizing committee for the preparation of the International Congress of Mathematicians The Congress will be held on July 6-14, 2022 in St. Petersburg.

December 4, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Prizes of the Government of Russia in the field of science and technology for 2019 were awarded Order dated November 29, 2019 No. 2846-r. 131 applicants became laureates of awards in 2019. Prizes were awarded for works in the field of medicine, energy, geology, production technologies, materials science, mechanical engineering, transport, information technologies, ecology and agriculture.

November 21, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Tatyana Golikova and Andrey Fursenko held a meeting of the Presidium of the Council for the implementation of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies The agenda includes discussion of the results of the analysis of programs for the creation and development of world-class genomic research centers in terms of the acquisition of equipment and the creation information systems, as well as requirements for the development of the instrument base.

November 12, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Dmitry Medvedev's trip to the Novosibirsk region and a meeting.

October 12, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Prizes of the Government of Russia in the field of science and technology for young scientists for 2019 were awarded Order dated October 7, 2019 No. 2323-r. In 2019, 25 applicants became the laureates of the awards. Prizes, in particular, were awarded for the development and implementation of methods and systems for intelligent control of robots different kind and purpose, an integrated system for ensuring sustainable life cycle buildings and structures, forevacuum plasma electronic sources for processing and modification of dielectric materials.

September 13, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Tatyana Golikova and Andrey Fursenko held a meeting of the Council for the implementation of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies The volume of financial support for the creation and support of genomic research centers for the period 2019–2024 from the federal budget will amount to 11.2 billion rubles.

September 9, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Dmitry Medvedev spoke at the solemn opening ceremony of the congress.

September 7, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development The size of the prizes of the Government of Russia in the field of science and technology for young scientists has been increased Decree of August 31, 2019 No. 1121. Since 2020, the amount of the monetary part of the prizes of the Russian Government in the field of science and technology for young scientists has been increased from 500 thousand rubles to 1 million rubles.

August 29, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Tatyana Golikova held a meeting of the Council for State Support for the Creation and Development of World-Class Mathematical Centers At the meeting, the winners of the competitive selection were determined and their programs of creation and development were approved.

August 28, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Alexey Gordeev held a meeting on the creation of a new wintering complex at the Vostok Antarctic station The meeting was held on the eve of the 200th anniversary of the discovery of Antarctica by Russian navigators under the command of Thaddeus Bellingshausen and Mikhail Lazarev.

August 23, 2019 , State policy in the field of research and development Indicators for the implementation of the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development have been established, the dynamics of which is subject to monitoring Order dated August 15, 2019 No. 1824-r. 11 indicators have been identified that reflect the progress of the implementation of the Strategy in the following areas: the impact of science and technology on the socio-economic development of Russia, including due to the transition to a model of great challenges; the state and effectiveness of the sphere of science, technology and innovation; the quality of state regulation and service provision of scientific, scientific, technical and innovative activities.

1

2. New state policy in the field of science

Russia is interested in the maximum development of its intellectual potential and its rational use for national needs. The necessary prerequisites for the survival, transformation and subsequent accelerated development of the nation include the sovereignization (decolonization) of the national scientific process, the restructuring of the entire education and science system with the selection and priority provision of its breakthrough areas, streamlining the property relations of scientific institutions, overcoming the social crisis of science, restoring and increasing the prestige of scientific and teaching activities in the community.

The strategic importance of a number of scientific disciplines and areas of R&D implementation is determined by the potential role of the relevant areas and technologies in the implementation of a breakthrough Russian economy to a higher quality high level, corresponding to the status of an economically sovereign power, the mission of the world pole of strategic influence and the role of an economic bridge between Europe and Asia, and strengthening the security of the nation, including in its socio-demographic aspect.

The necessary prerequisites for the survival, transformation and subsequent accelerated development of the nation include the sovereignization (decolonization) of the national scientific process, the restructuring of the entire education and science system, overcoming the social and financial crisis in these areas, restoring and increasing the prestige of scientific and teaching activities in society.

The significance of non-strategic areas of science and education in the process of national revival is determined by their functional role in the overall provision of breakthrough development, the contribution of specific teams to the economic development of the country, their connection to national and interregional programs of economic revival, as well as compliance scientific activity new paradigm of national development.

Participation in strategic scientific developments is a particularly honorable activity, which provides for a special public status of the scientific, engineering and teaching staff of the relevant profiles. At the same time, education in the field of strategically important sciences, the organization of strategic scientific research, the formulation and implementation of strategic development programs are accompanied by special requirements for pedagogical, scientific and managerial personnel.

The new state policy in the field of higher education, science and technology is being implemented in the context of systemic economic and social transformations and is determined by the priority tasks of economic recovery at the national and regional levels, as well as the strategic relevance of preserving and re-forming scientific schools, restoring and developing the material and technological base of leading research and educational institutions.

The foundations of a new policy in the field of education, science and technology are being laid in the preparatory period of systemic transformations.

During the preparatory period for the transformations, the Security Council of Russia (its new powers and functions in the system of state power are disclosed in chapter 2 part 6 ) instructs its specialized expert councils to develop proposals for the optimal structure of ministries and departments that are entrusted with the implementation of the economic revival strategy in accordance with the doctrinal developments of the Security Council. Taking into account the recommendations of the newly created Temporary Personnel Commission, the Security Council distributes departmental and personal responsibility for the implementation of specific areas.

Taking into account the data of the newly formed national Interim Commission on technical inventory and VKTI of territorial districts, specialized expert councils of the Security Council develop proposals for the optimal development of scientific and technological centers, the concentration of productive forces, the formation of infrastructure corridors, and the attraction and purposeful professional specialization of labor resources. Based on these proposals, a preliminary list of branches of fundamental sciences and related scientific and educational schools and institutions subject to priority state support.

After legislative approval the main doctrinal documents fixing the change in the national development paradigm, upon completion of the activities of the National Commission for Financial Inventory and the final structural and personnel changes in the system of executive power, the Security Council initiates the convening of the Council for Strategic Development - a special interdepartmental structure of the Government of Russia, approving the priorities of scientific, technological and industrial and infrastructure development, developing on their basis national and interregional programs for economic revival and breakthrough strategic projects.

The composition of the Strategic Development Council is formed in accordance with the new structure of the Russian Government. The preparation of nationwide programs for scientific and technological development and strategic projects is carried out in coordination with permanent public (corporate estate) structures - the Scientific and Technical Council, the Council of Technical Managers, the Russian Business Council, then the projects are approved by the Security Council of Russia.

Nationwide programs for comprehensive economic recovery and strategic scientific and technological projects, which provide for an interdisciplinary nature and the accelerated introduction of unclaimed and new scientific developments, serve as engines of the scientific and educational process as a whole. The concentration of project activities in the centers of strategic developments under the plenipotentiary representations of the Head of State and the development on their basis of interregional programs for economic revival involves the consolidation of promising scientific personnel at the regional level, the preservation and new formation of regional scientific schools and their involvement in project and implementation activities in the interests of the comprehensive development of regions , alignment of their socio-economic opportunities and rational use unclaimed resource and transport and transit potential.

The implementation of the new paradigm of economic and scientific and technological development involves:

- overcoming the dependence of strategic industries and relevant areas of education and research on foreign state and corporate interests;

– formation and specialization of funding sources for higher education and scientific research, taking into account the task of restoring scientific schools and mechanisms for the experimental and industrial implementation of scientific developments;

- restructuring the system of education and science in accordance with the priority tasks of national revival;

- state support for the system of higher education and science with the targeted creation of benefits for the strategic areas of scientific research and strategic design;

– qualitative reorganization of the system of vocational guidance and personnel selection;

– raising the social status of scientists employed in strategic areas of science through the versatile involvement of scientists in the tasks of public administration, the provision of special social privileges to scientists employed in strategic areas, the introduction of an incentive system scientific achievements and invention, including inspiration through the media of public information and propaganda.

From the book Social Emergencies and Protection from Them author Gubanov Vyacheslav Mikhailovich

From the book Service Marketing. Handbook of a Russian Marketer Practitioner author Razumovskaya Anna

From the book Europe at the Turn of the 20th-21st Centuries: Economic Problems author Chernikov Gennady Petrovich

Chapter 9 Service Pricing He thought the Mighty Albatross was circling above him; He rubbed his eyes, and it was a financial question! L. Carroll. Song of the Gardener 9.1. Goals and principles of pricing in the service sector In a competitive environment, the effectiveness of any

From the book Jurisprudence: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

From the book Basics social work: Cheat sheet author author unknown

From the book Encyclopedia of the Lawyer of the author

From the book 100 great events of the twentieth century author Nepomniachtchi Nikolai Nikolaevich

32. STATE POLICY IN THE FIELD OF EMPLOYMENT OF THE POPULATION In the context of the formation of market relations, the state policy in the field of employment should be aimed at optimizing the labor market, promoting labor mobility, creating new jobs,

From the book Oddities of Our Evolution author Harrison Keith

Crimes in the sphere of economy CRIMES IN THE SPHERE OF THE ECONOMY - a group of crimes that are largely similar in terms of the object of encroachment, united by the legislator in section VIII of the Criminal Code, which consists of three chapters: Ch. 21 "Crimes against property", Ch. 22

From the book History of State and Law of Russia author Pashkevich Dmitry

1921 New economic policy in Soviet Russia Many communists felt the introduction of the New Economic Policy no less acutely than the signing of the humiliating Brest Peace. The admission of capitalist elements into national economy, free

From the book Russian Doctrine author Kalashnikov Maxim

What Doesn't Belong to Reason In Chapter 2, I said that the two fundamental principles of human knowledge of the world are logic and intuition, and that science reflects the logical approach, while religion reflects the intuitive approach. In fact, the second approach covers something more than intuition and

From the book Psychology of Communication. encyclopedic Dictionary author Team of authors

41. New economic policy. Regulations on state industrial trusts of the NEP. By early 1921, the civil war was largely over. The economic situation was terrible, it was necessary to restore the economy, devastated by war and intervention.

From the book The Big Book of Wisdom author Dushenko Konstantin Vasilievich

7. State support of higher education and science Guided by the goal of reviving scientific (educational, research and scientific-practical) schools and creating the necessary conditions for intensive scientific research, the state, in accordance with

From the book History. A new complete guide for schoolchildren to prepare for the exam author Nikolaev Igor Mikhailovich

From the book What to do in emergency situations author Sitnikov Vitaly Pavlovich

Politics See also “Foreign Policy”, “Elections”, “State”, “Ideas. Ideology”, “Parties”, “Propaganda”, “Reforms”, “Unions and Coalitions” Politics is not an exact science. Otto von Bismarck Politics is the art of the possible. Otto von Bismarck It is not true that there is politics

From the author's book

The New Economic Policy (NEP) The reasons for the transition to the New Economic Policy should be sought in the specific situation that developed in Soviet Russia after the end of the Civil War. World War I and civil war, as well as the policy of "war communism"

From the author's book

Service Conflicts