During the Great Embassy of the Russian Tsar Peter to Western countries - the real Tsar Peter was planted in the Bastille as an "Iron Mask", and the freemason Anatoly, under the name of the false emperor "Peter the Great", began to commit excesses in Russia, which he declared an empire in the Western manner.

Rice. 1. False Peter the First and my reading of the inscriptions on his portrait

The portrait I borrowed from the video where the Announcer says: " But already on his other engraving, as well as on all subsequent portraits of other artists, we see a completely different person, unlike his relatives. It would seem absurd!

But the oddities don't end there either. On the engravings and portraits of 1698, this man looks more like a 20-year-old boy. However, in the Dutch and German portraits of 1697, the same person looks more like 30 years old.

How could this happen?»

I am starting an epigraphic analysis of this portrait. A clue to where to look for certain inscriptions are the two previous portraits. First, I read the inscription on the brooch attached to the headdress, which says: MIM YAR RURIK. In other words, this is another priest of Yar Rurik, although there is no signature of CHARAOH. It may very well be that the absence of this highest spiritual rank means that this priest did not recognize the spiritual priority of Rurik, although he was formally his priest. In this case, he was very suitable for the role of Peter's double.

Then I read the inscriptions on the fur collar on the left, above the white frame: TEMPLE OF MARY YARA. I consider this inscription as a continuation of the previous one. And inside the fragment circled in white, I read the words in inverted color: MOSCOW MARY 865 YARA (YEAR). Under Mary's Moscow, Veliky Novgorod was understood; however, already the first Romanov introduces real Christianity, and Patriarch Nikon, under Alexei Mikhailovich, eliminates all remnants of Russian Vedism from Muscovy. Consequently, Russian Vedists partly go to the Russian hinterland, partly go to the Russian diaspora in neighboring states. And the year 865 Yar is 1721 A.D. , this is more than 70 years after Nikon's reforms. By this time, the places of the priests were no longer occupied by children, but by the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the priests removed by Nikon, and the grandchildren and great-grandchildren often no longer speak the speech of their grandfathers and great-grandfathers. But maybe the year is shown finalization this engraving, which was begun in 1698. But even in this case, the depicted young man is 6-8 years younger than Peter.

And on the very bottom fragment, under the frame on the fur collar on the left, I read the word MASK. Then I read the inscription on the fur collar on the right: the top of the collar, diagonally, contains the inscription ANATOLY FROM RUSSIA MARY, and the line below - 35 ARKONA YARA. But the 35th Arkona Yar, this is the same as Mary's Moscow, this is Veliky Novgorod. In other words, one of the ancestors of this Anatoly in the middle of the 17th century could actually be a priest in this city, while after Nikon's reforms he ended up somewhere in the Russian diaspora. It is possible that in Catholic Poland, which very diligently carried out all the decrees of the Pope.

Rice. 2. Portrait of Peter by an unknown artist at the end of the 18th century

So, we now know that the young man with the bulging eyes was not Peter at all, but Anatoly; in other words, the substitution of the king is documented.

We see that this portrait was painted in Veliky Novgorod. But apart from the name of False Peter, this portrait did not bring any details, and, moreover, the artist was not even named, so this portrait was not entirely acceptable as an evidence document, which made me look for other canvases. And soon the desired portrait was found: “ Peter the Great, Emperor of All Russia, portrait by an unknown late artistXVIII century» . Below I will show why the artist was unknown.

Epigraphic analysis of the second portrait of the False Peter.

I chose this particular image of Peter, because on his silk baldric I read the word YARA below, deciding that the portrait belonged to the painter of their Yar temple. And I was not mistaken. The letters were inscribed both in separate parts of the face and in the folds of clothing.

Rice. 3. My reading of the inscriptions on the portrait of Peter in fig. 2

It is clear that if I suspected the presence of Russian inscriptions on a blue silk ribbon, then I began reading from it. True, since in the direct color these letters are not very contrasting, I go to the inverted color. And here you can see the inscription, made in very large letters: TEMPLE YAR, and on the collar - the inscription MASK. This confirmed my preliminary reading. In modern terms, this means: IMAGE FROM THE TEMPLE OF YAR .

And then I moved on to reading the inscriptions on the parts of the face. First - on the right side of the face, on the left at the viewer's point of view. On the lower strands of hair (I rotated this fragment 90 degrees to the right, clockwise). Here I read the words: MASK OF THE TEMPLE OF RURIK. In other words, IMAGE FROM THE TEMPLE OF RURIK .

On the hair above the forehead you can read the words: MIM OF THE TEMPLE OF RURIK. Finally, on the right from the viewer's point of view, on the left side of the face, one can read ANATOLY MASK FROM RURIK YAR JUTLAND. Firstly, it is confirmed here that False Peter was called Anatoly, and, secondly, it turned out that he does not come from Holland, as many researchers have suggested, but from neighboring Denmark. However, the transition from one country to another at the end of the 17th century, apparently, did not pose a big problem.

Next, I move on to reading the inscription on the mustache. Here you can read the words: RIMA MIM. In other words, Dane by birth and Dutch by language, was an agent of Rome's influence. For the umpteenth time, the final center of action against Russia-Russia is Rome!

But can this claim be verified? - I examine the armor on the right hand, as well as the background behind the hand. True, for readability, I rotate this fragment to the right by 90 degrees (clockwise). And here on the background in the form of fur you can read the words: MASK OF THE TEMPLE OF ROME and ROMA MIM RUSSIA RIMA. In other words, about the fact that before us is really the image of not the emperor of Russia, but the priest of Rome! And on armor, hands can be read on every two plates: ROMA MIM. RIMA MIM.

Finally, on the fur collar next to the left arm, one can read the words: RURIK ROME MIM.

Thus, it becomes clear that the temples of Rurik existed as early as the 18th century, and their priests, creating portraits of dead people (usually the priests of the temple of Mary did this), usually wrote their titles, as well as names. This is exactly what we saw in this portrait. However, in a Christian country (where Christianity had been the official religion for more than a century), it was not safe to advertise the existence of Vedic temples, which is why the artist of this portrait remained unknown.

Rice. 4. The death mask of Rurik and my reading of the inscriptions

Death mask of Peter.

Then I decided to look on the Internet for foreign sites. In the article, I read the section “The Great Embassy” with interest. In particular, it said: " His Grand Embassy, ​​numbering 250 participants, left Moscow in March 1697. Peter became the first king to leave his kingdom. The official purpose of the embassy was to give a new breath to the coalition against the Ottoman Empire. However, Peter made no secret of the fact that he went to "observe and learn" and to recruit foreign specialists for his new Russia. In the then Swedish city of Riga, the tsar was allowed to inspect the fortress, but to his great surprise, he was not allowed to take measurements. In Courland (the current region of the coast of Lithuania and Latvia), Peter met with the Dutch ruler, Frederick Casimir. The prince tried to persuade Peter to join his coalition against Sweden. In Königsberg, Peter visited the fortress of Friedrichsburg. He took part in visiting artillery courses, and graduated with a diploma certifying that "Peter Mikhailov received skills as a bombardier and skills in the use of firearms».

The following describes a visit by Peter Leeuwenhoek with his microscope and Witsen, who compiled a book describing northern and eastern Tartaria. But most of all I was interested in the description of his secret meeting: September 11, 1697 Peter had a secret meeting with King William of EnglandIII. Nothing is known about their negotiations, except that they lasted two hours and ended in a friendly parting. At that time, the English navy was regarded as the fastest in the world. King William assured that Peter should visit the English naval shipyards, where he would learn to understand the design of ships, make measurements and calculations, and learn how to use instruments and tools. As soon as he arrived in England he tried to sail the Thames» .

One gets the impression that it was in England that the best conditions were formed for the replacement of Peter by Anatoly.

The same article published the death mask of Peter the Great. The caption underneath reads: "DeathmaskofPeter. After 1725, St Petersburg, from the original by Bartolomeo Rastrelli, after 1725, Bronze-tinted plaster. Case 34.5 x 29 x 33 cm. State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg." This death mask has forehead I read the inscription in the form of a strand of hair: MIMA RUSI ROME MASK. She confirms that this image does not belong to the Emperor of Russia Peter the Great, but to the Roman priest Anatoly.

Rice. 5. Miniature by an unknown artist and my reading of the inscriptions

Miniature by an unknown artist.

I found it at the address with the signature: “PetertheGreat (1672 - 1725) of Russia. Enamel miniature portrait by an unknown artist, late 1790s. #Russian #history #Romanov”, Fig.5.

Upon inspection, it can be argued that the largest number of inscriptions is on the background. The miniature itself I strengthened in contrast. To the left and above the head of the portrait, I read the captions: ROMA RURIK YARA MARY TEMPLE AND ROME MIM AND ARKONA 30. In other words, now it is specified in which particular temple of Mary of Rome the miniature was made: in the capital of the state of Rome, in the city a little to the west CAIRA .

To the left of the head at the level of the hair, I read in the background the words: MARY RUSSIA TEMPLE OF VAGRIA. Perhaps this is the address of the customer of the thumbnail. Finally, I read the inscriptions on the character's face, on his left cheek (where the wart on the left side of his nose is missing), and here you can read the words below the shadow of the cheek: RIMA MIM ANATOLY RIMA JAR STOLITSY. So, once again, the name of Anatoly is confirmed, now written in rather large letters.

Rice. 6. A fragment of a picture from the British Encyclopedia and my reading of the inscriptions

Painting of Peter from the Encyclopædia Britannica.

Here I read the inscriptions on the fragment, where there is a bust portrait, fig. 6, although the full picture is much larger, Fig. 7. However, I singled out exactly the fragment and the size that suited me perfectly for epigraphic analysis.

The first inscription that I began to read is the image of a mustache. On them you can read the words: TEMPLE OF ROME MIMA, and then - continuation on the upper lip: RURIK, and then on the red part of the lip: MARY'S TEMPLE MASK, and further - on the lower lip: ANATOLY ROMA ARKONA 30. In other words, here we see a confirmation of the previous inscriptions: again the name of Anatoly, and again his link to the temple of Mary Rurik in the city near Cairo.

Then I read the inscription on the collar: 30 ARKONA YARA. And then I turn to the consideration of the fragment to the left of Peter's face, which I circled with a black frame. Here I read the words: 30 ARKONA YARA that has already been read. But then there are new and amazing words: ANATOLY MARY TEMPLE IN ANKARA ROME. It is not so much the existence of a special temple dedicated to Anatolia that is surprising, but the location of such a temple in Ankara, the capital of Turkey. I have not yet read such words anywhere. Moreover, the word ANATOLY can be understood not only as a proper name of a person, but also as the name of a locality in Turkey.

For the time being, I consider it sufficient to consider the inscriptions on the portraits. And then I am interested in the details of the substitution of the Russian Tsar, which can be found in printed works on the Internet.

Rice. 7. Painting from Encyclopædia Britannica online

Wikipedia's opinion on the substitution of Peter the Great.

In the article “The Double of Peter I”, Wikipedia, in particular, states: “ According to one version, the substitution of Peter I was organized by some influential forces in Europe during the tsar's trip to the Grand Embassy. It is alleged that of the Russian people who accompanied the tsar on a diplomatic trip to Europe, only Alexander Menshikov returned - the rest are believed to have been killed. The purpose of this crime was to put his protege at the head of Russia, who pursued a policy that was beneficial to the organizers of the substitution and those who stood behind them. One of the possible goals of this substitution is the weakening of Russia».

Note that the history of the conspiracy to change the tsar of Russia in this presentation is conveyed only from the side of facts, and, moreover, very vaguely. As if the Great Embassy itself had only the goal of creating a coalition against the Ottoman Empire, and not the goal of replacing the real Romanov with his double.

« It is alleged that Peter I, according to the memoirs of his contemporaries, changed dramatically after returning from the Great Embassy. As evidence of the substitution, portraits of the king are given before and after his return from Europe. It is alleged that in the portrait of Peter, before traveling to Europe, he had an elongated face, curly hair and a large wart under his left eye. In the portraits of the king after returning from Europe, he had a round face, straight hair and no wart under his left eye. When Peter I returned from the Great Embassy, ​​he was 28 years old, and on his portraits after his return he looked to be about 40 years old. It is believed that the king before the trip was of a dense build and above average height, but still not a two-meter giant. The returned king was thin, had very narrow shoulders, and his height, which was established quite accurately, was 2 meters 4 centimeters. So tall people were a rarity at that time».

We see that the authors of these Wikipedia lines do not at all share the provisions that they present to the reader, although these provisions are facts. How can you not notice such a striking change in appearance? Thus, Wikipedia tries to present obvious provisions with some speculation, something like this: “ it is said that two times two equals four". The fact that the person who arrived from the embassy was different can be seen by comparing any of the portraits in fig. 1-7 with a portrait of the departed king, fig. eight.

Rice. 8. Portrait of the departed Tsar Peter the Great and my reading of the inscriptions

To the dissimilarity of facial features, one can add the dissimilarity of implicit inscriptions on these two types of portraits. The real Peter is signed as "Peter Alekseevich", False Peter on all five portraits - as Anatoly. Although both were mimes (priests) of the temple of Rurik in Rome.

I will continue to quote Wikipedia: According to supporters of the conspiracy theory, soon after the arrival of the double in Russia, rumors began to spread among the archers that the tsar was not real. Peter's sister Sophia, realizing that an impostor had arrived instead of her brother, led a streltsy revolt, which was brutally suppressed, and Sophia was imprisoned in a monastery».

Note that in this case, the motive of the uprising of the archers and Sophia turns out to be extremely serious, while the motive of Sophia's struggle with her brother for the throne in a country where only men have reigned so far (a common motive of academic historiography) seems to be very far-fetched.

« It is alleged that Peter loved his wife Evdokia Lopukhina very much, often corresponded with her when he was away. After the return of the king from Europe, on his orders, Lopukhina was forcibly sent to the Suzdal Monastery, even against the will of the clergy (it is alleged that Peter did not even see her and did not explain the reasons for Lopukhina's imprisonment in the monastery).

It is believed that after his return, Peter did not recognize his relatives and subsequently did not meet either with them or with his inner circle. In 1698, shortly after Peter's return from Europe, his associates Lefort and Gordon died suddenly. According to conspiracy theorists, it was on their initiative that Peter went to Europe».

It is not clear why Wikipedia calls this concept conspiracy theories. According to a conspiracy of the nobility, Paul the First was killed, the conspirators threw a bomb at the feet of Alexander II, the USA, England and Germany contributed to the elimination of Nicholas II. In other words, the West has repeatedly interfered in the fate of Russian sovereigns.

« Supporters of the conspiracy theory argue that the returned king was ill with a tropical fever in a chronic form, while it can only be contracted in southern waters, and even then only having been in the jungle. The route of the Great Embassy passed by the northern sea route. The surviving documents of the Great Embassy do not mention that the constable Pyotr Mikhailov (under this name the tsar went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, while for the people accompanying him it was no secret who Mikhailov really was. After returning from the Great Embassy, ​​Peter I during naval battles demonstrated great experience boarding combat, which has specific features, which can only be mastered by experience. Boarding combat skills require direct participation in many boarding battles. Before traveling to Europe, Peter I did not take part in naval battles, since during his childhood and youth, Russia did not have access to the seas, with the exception of the White Sea, which Peter I did not visit often - mainly as an honored passenger».

It follows from this that Anatoly was a naval officer who took part in the naval battles of the southern seas, having been ill with tropical fever.

« It is alleged that the returned tsar spoke Russian poorly, that he did not learn to write correctly in Russian until the end of his life, and that he "hated everything Russian." Conspiracy theorists believe that before traveling to Europe, the tsar was distinguished by piety, and when he returned, he stopped fasting, attending church, mocked the clergy, began persecuting the Old Believers and began to close monasteries. It is believed that in two years Peter forgot all the sciences and subjects that the educated Moscow nobility owned, and at the same time acquired skills of a simple craftsman. There is a striking, according to conspiracy theorists, change in the character and psyche of Peter after returning».

Again, there are clear changes not only in Peter's appearance, but also in Peter's language and habits. In other words, Anatoly did not belong not only to the royal, but even to the nobility, being a typical representative of the third estate. In addition, there is no mention that Anatoly spoke Dutch fluently, which many researchers note. In other words, he came from somewhere in the Dutch-Danish region.

« It is alleged that the tsar, having returned from Europe, did not know about the location of the richest library of Ivan the Terrible, although the secret of finding this library was passed from tsar to tsar. So, Princess Sophia allegedly knew where the library was and visited it, and Peter, who came from Europe, repeatedly made attempts to find the library and even organized excavations.».

Again, a specific fact is given out by Wikipedia for some "statements".

« As evidence of the substitution of Peter, his behavior and actions are given (in particular, the fact that the tsar, who used to prefer traditional Russian clothes, no longer wore it after returning from Europe, including royal clothes with a crown - conspiracy theorists explain the latter fact by the fact that the impostor was taller than Peter and had narrower shoulders, and the things of the king did not fit him), as well as his reforms. It is argued that these reforms have done far more harm to Russia than good. As evidence, the tightening of serfdom by Peter, and the persecution of the Old Believers, and the fact that under Peter I in Russia there were many foreigners in the service and in various positions are used as evidence. Before his trip to Europe, Peter I set as his goal to expand the territory of Russia, including moving south towards the Black and mediterranean seas. One of the main goals of the Grand Embassy was to achieve an alliance of European powers against Turkey. While the returned king began the struggle for mastery of the Baltic coast. The war with Sweden conducted by the tsar, according to supporters of the conspiracy theory, was needed by Western states that wanted to crush the growing power of Sweden with the hands of Russia. It is alleged that Peter I pursued a foreign policy in the interests of Poland, Saxony and Denmark, which could not resist the Swedish king Charles XII».

It is clear that the raids of the Crimean khans on Moscow were a constant threat to Russia, and the rulers of the Ottoman Empire stood behind the Crimean khans. Therefore, the fight against Turkey was a more important strategic task for Russia than the fight on the Baltic coast. And the Wikipedia mention of Denmark is consistent with the inscription on one of the portraits that Anatoly was from Jutland.

« As proof, the case of Tsarevich Alexei Petrovich is cited, who fled abroad in 1716, where he planned to wait for the death of Peter (who was seriously ill during this period) on the territory of the Holy Roman Empire and then, relying on the help of the Austrians, become the Russian Tsar. According to supporters of the version of the substitution of the king, Alexei Petrovich fled to Europe because he sought to free his real father, imprisoned in the Bastille. According to Gleb Nosovsky, the agents of the impostor announced to Alexei that after his return he would be able to take the throne himself, since loyal troops were waiting for him in Russia, ready to support his coming to power. Aleksey Petrovich, who returned, is believed by conspiracy theorists to have been killed on the orders of an impostor.».

And this version turns out to be more serious than the academic one, where the son opposes his father for ideological reasons, and the father, without putting his son under house arrest, immediately applies capital punishment. All this in the academic version looks unconvincing.

Version of Gleb Nosovsky.

Wikipedia also sets out a version of the new chronologists. " According to Gleb Nosovsky, initially he heard many times about the version of Peter's substitution, but he never believed in it. At one time, Fomenko and Nosovsky studied an exact copy of the throne of Ivan the Terrible. In those days, the zodiac signs of the current rulers were placed on the thrones. Examining the signs placed on the throne of Ivan the Terrible, Nosovsky and Fomenko found out that the actual date of his birth differs from the official version by four years.

The authors of the New Chronology compiled a table of the names of Russian tsars and their birthdays, and thanks to this table, they found out that the official birthday of Peter I (May 30) does not coincide with the day of his angel, which is a noticeable contradiction compared to all the names of Russian tsars. After all, names in Russia at baptism were given exclusively according to the holy calendar, and the name given to Peter violated the established centuries-old tradition, which in itself does not fit into the framework and laws of that time. Nosovsky and Fomenko, on the basis of the table, found out that the real name, which falls on the official date of birth of Peter I, was "Isakiy". This explains the name of the main cathedral of tsarist Russia, St. Isaac's.

Nosovsky believes that the Russian historian Pavel Milyukov also shared the opinion about the forgery of the tsar in an article in the encyclopedia of Brockhausazai and Evfron, Milyukov, according to Nosovsky, without stating directly, repeatedly hinted that Peter I was an impostor. The substitution of the tsar by an impostor was carried out, according to Nosovsky, by a certain group of Germans, and together with a double, a group of foreigners came to Russia. According to Nosovsky, rumors about the substitution of the tsar were very common among Peter's contemporaries, and almost all archers claimed that the tsar was fake. Nosovsky believes that May 30 was in fact not Peter's birthday, but the impostor who replaced him, on whose orders St. Isaac's Cathedral was built, named after him».

The name "Anatoly" revealed by us does not contradict this version, because the name "Anatoly" was a monastic one, and not given at birth. - As you can see, the "new chronologists" have added another touch to the portrait of the impostor.

Historiography of Peter.

It would seem that what is easier is to consider the biographies of Peter the Great, preferably lifetime ones, and explain the contradictions that interest us.

However, this is where disappointment awaits us. Here's what you can read in the work: " There were persistent rumors among the people about the non-Russian origin of Peter. He was called the Antichrist, the German foundling. The difference between Tsar Alexei and his son was so striking that many historians suspected Peter's non-Russian origin. Moreover, the official version of the origin of Peter was too unconvincing. She left and leaves more questions than answers. Many researchers have tried to lift the veil of strange reticence about the Petrine phenomenon. However, all these attempts instantly fell under the strictest taboo of the ruling house of the Romanovs. The phenomenon of Peter remained unsolved».

So, the people unequivocally asserted that Peter had been replaced. Doubts arose not only among the people, but even among historians. And then we read with surprise: In an incomprehensible way, until the middle of the 19th century, not a single work was published with a complete historiography of Peter the Great. The first who decided to publish a complete scientific and historical biography of Peter was the remarkable Russian historian Nikolai Gerasimovich Ustryalov, already mentioned by us. In the introduction to his work "History of the reign of Peter the Great" he details why so far (mid 19th century) scientific work on the history of Peter the Great is missing". This is how this detective story began.

According to Ustryalov, back in 1711, Peter was eager to get the history of his reign and entrusted this honorary mission to the translator of the Posolsky Prikaz Venedikt Schiling. All were given to the latter necessary materials and archives, but ... the work was never published, not a single sheet of the manuscript was preserved. Even more mysterious: “The Russian Tsar had every right to be proud of his exploits and wish to pass on to posterity the memory of his deeds in a true, unadorned form. Thought he undertook to fulfillFeofan Prokopovich , Bishop of Pskov, and teacher of Tsarevich Alexei Petrovich,Baron Huysen . Official materials were communicated to both of them, as can be seen from the writings of Theophanes, and as the sovereign’s handwritten note of 1714, preserved in his cabinet affairs, testifies even more: “Give all the journals to Gizen”(one). It would seem that now the History of Peter I will finally be published. But it was not there: “A skillful preacher, a learned theologian, Theophan was not a historian at all ... From that, describing the battles, he fell into inevitable mistakes; moreover, he worked with obvious haste, in a hurry, made omissions that he wanted to supplement later.. As we can see, Peter's choice was unsuccessful: Feofan was not a historian and did not understand anything at all. Huysen's work also turned out to be unsatisfactory and was not published: “Baron Huysen, having authentic journals of campaigns and travels in his hands, limited himself to extracts from them until 1715, without any connection, entangling many trifles and outside affairs into historical events”.

In a word, neither this biography nor subsequent ones took place. And the author comes to this conclusion: The strictest censorship of all historical research continued into the 19th century. So the work of N.G. Ustryalov, which is the first scientific historiography of Peter I, was subjected to severe censorship. From the 10-volume edition, only separate excerpts from 4 volumes have been preserved! Last time this fundamental study about Peter I (1, 2, 3 vols, part of the 4th vol, 6 vols) was published in a truncated version only in 1863! Today it is actually lost and is preserved only in antique collections. The same fate befell the work of I.I. Golikov "Acts of Peter the Great", which has not been reprinted since the century before last! Notes of an associate and personal turner of Peter I A.K. Nartov "Reliable Narratives and Speeches of Peter the Great" were first opened and published only in 1819. At the same time, a scanty circulation in the little-known magazine "Son of the Fatherland". But even that edition underwent an unprecedented revision, when only 74 out of 162 stories were published. This work was not republished anymore, the original was irretrievably lost.» .

The entire book by Alexander Kas is called "The collapse of the empire of Russian tsars" (1675-1700), which implies the establishment of an empire of non-Russian tsars. And in chapter IX, under the title "How the royal dynasty was cut out under Peter," he describes the standing of Stepan Razin's troops 12 miles near Moscow. And he describes many other interesting, but practically unknown events. However, he does not give more information about the False Peter.

Other opinions.

Again, I will continue to quote the already named Wikipedia article: “It is alleged that Peter's double was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas. It is sometimes stated that he was a sea pirate. Sergei Sall believes that the impostor was a high-ranking Dutch Freemason and a relative of the King of Holland and Great Britain, William of Orange. It is most often mentioned that the real name of the double was Isaac (according to one version, his name was Isaac Andre). According to Bayda, the double was either from Sweden or Denmark, and by religion he was most likely a Lutheran.

Bayda claims that the real Peter was imprisoned in the Bastille, and that he was the famous prisoner who went down in history under the name of the Iron Mask. According to Baida, this prisoner was recorded under the name Marchiel, which can be interpreted as "Mikhailov" (under this surname Peter went to the Great Embassy). It is stated that the Iron Mask was tall, carried himself with dignity, and was treated fairly well. In 1703, Peter, according to Bayda, was killed in the Bastille. Nosovsky claims that the real Peter was kidnapped and most likely killed.

It is sometimes argued that the real Peter was actually tricked into traveling to Europe so that some foreign powers could force him to subsequently pursue the policies they wanted. Not agreeing to this, Peter was kidnapped or killed, and a double was put in his place.

In one version of the version, the real Peter was captured by the Jesuits and imprisoned in

EXTRA see:

"How Tsar Peter I was replaced" -
"Investigation of the kidnapping and substitution of Tsar Peter I and the nomination of an impostor to the royal throne" -

CRITICISM OF THE VERSION ABOUT THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN TSAR PETER THE GREAT FOR HIS DOUBLE

Now in the global network, called the Internet, a lot of materials on past history have appeared, which challenge the established point of view and offer new versions of certain events. Since history is a human matter, it could not be compiled without the influence of certain groups of people in power and defending their interests and benefits. That is why it is not surprising that many facts of the past were presented exaggeratedly and distortedly, or even completely invented. HOWEVER THE GENERAL CANVAS STAYED CLOSE TO REALITY.

What really happened, only God knows. Partly, the participants of some historical event know this. History is being created before our eyes, and sometimes we cannot understand what is happening, why, in whose favor and by whom it is moving. For example, the story of the rise in ancient egypt Joseph the Beautiful was brought to us by God through the prophet Moses. There is no such story in the Egyptian chronicles and everything is written in a completely different way. Why? Because the Egyptians did not want to look bad in the eyes of other peoples and states. And what nation or government or church or group of people wants to look bad? That is why history has always been cleaned up and corrected by those who are interested in it. That is why those who believe in God and the Bible have one story, and those who do not believe in another, different from the biblical one. Most often, it is not the events themselves that are distorted, but their interpretation and motivation. Ultimately, everything is based on the faith and trust of some people (who did not live then and did not participate in the events described in historical books) to other persons, those who recorded these events and their explanation, as their participant or as a listener from the first persons of these events. The reliability of the record of events depends on the honesty of the persons who transmitted these events to the chronicler. In addition to the testimony of eyewitnesses and participants, additional historical sources are various documents, letters, memoirs, notes of various persons, coins, postage stamps, heraldry, weapons, household items, equipment, scientific works, architectural ensembles, temples, cathedrals, palaces, chambers and other works of architecture, works of art, monuments, chronicles of wars, post-war treaties, later - photographs, audio and video recordings, newsreels and much more.

One of the modern historical myths there is a version that Tsar Peter the Great, during his stay in Europe with the Great Embassy, ​​was kidnapped and another person similar to him was put in his place. The very idea of ​​this version and its technical implementation have a place to be. Something like this really could have happened, but it didn't. All the versions of “evidence” offered by the authors are very strained and can only matter to those people who really want to believe in this version. For a thoughtful and impartial view, a number of reasonable objections and questions arise.

So, for the time being, let's take on faith this version of the substitution of Tsar Peter the Great for his double and, based on this fact, we will pose a number of questions:

1. Who ordered this action and who needed it and why?
2. What is the motive for this crime?
3. Tsar Peter was not alone in the Great Embassy. There were many people with him who knew him well. If there was a substitution of the king, then how did these persons not notice this substitution? Or if they noticed, then why were they silent and this mystery waited until the 21st century?
4. In addition to the persons of the Great Embassy, ​​other persons in Russia also knew Tsar Peter. Why, when he (his double) returned to Russia, did they not raise this issue? Is it really such a mundane and unimportant matter to anyone that you can just ignore it? For example, the Old Believers went into schism and to the stake for smaller reasons. The version that False Peter allegedly managed to neutralize all the former environment of Tsar Peter the Great is incredible! The change of one and the same person, and striking, is a very real thing. This has happened and happens often. But it is impossible to explain any change in a person's behavior by replacing it with a double.
5. According to the version, False Peter was a foreigner (i.e. not Russian). Then it is not clear how he could instantly and imperceptibly for others enter into the atmosphere of Tsar Peter? After all, for him it is a foreign country, a foreign people, a foreign culture, foreign customs, etc. How did he navigate the Kremlin and Moscow, and even more so in the affairs of the Russian state? How could he, imperceptibly to the environment, use Peter's objects without giving himself away? How could people not notice the change in speech style, accent, and other features of the double's speech?
6. How could all the changes visible to others be kept in the strictest confidence? Suppose people from the environment of Tsar Peter were afraid of the death penalty and therefore were silent. But someone could let it slip before death, at confession, or after moving to another country. Such a secret is very difficult to keep without "leaks" and publicity. Moreover, the False Peter was alone, in a strange environment and had to constantly be afraid of being exposed. He could be blackmailed. He could be manipulated by those who found out that it was not Peter. But nothing of the sort happened.
7. As for the conduct of wars, Peter the Great has never been an outstanding commander. The courage shown by him in Azov is the ardor of youth, and not a manifestation of the genius of the commander. According to the version, the true Tsar Peter allegedly opposed the double and the impostor together with the Swedish king Charles 12. If this were true, then it is not clear why the main incentive and motive for this war - the imposture of False Peter and the authenticity of the true Tsar Peter - were not loudly voiced throughout Russia , all of Europe and the whole world? After all, even genuine impostors to the Russian throne - False Dmitry, Razin, Pugachev - used this motive! And how could the Russian tsar achieve his restoration to the throne with the help of foreign troops, by killing and bloodshed his subjects? This is complete absurdity!
8. What Peter the Great began to do after returning from Europe could only be done by a genuine Russian tsar, for no impostor would have been let down. The impostor would be secretly poisoned or stabbed to death in his sleep, and in the morning his imposture would be revealed!
8. It is known that Tsar Peter, with a large stature, had a small foot size for a man of this height (38). This is known from his shoes, descriptions, and the wax figure of Tsar Peter. It is impossible to fake it for another person, as well as to hide the size of the legs, especially its rare disproportionate combination with height.
10. In addition to secular persons, Tsar Peter was well known to representatives of the clergy of the Russian Church. They could not fail to notice the substitution of the king or keep silent about it. For example, I know each of my spiritual children and would immediately notice his substitution even for a very similar person. The spirit, the peculiarity of speech and behavior, and much more that cannot be described cannot be faked. Moreover, the Orthodox tsar, according to the version, stopped attending churches, services, fasting, etc.
11. If, out of fear, ordinary believers or priests would be silent, then the saints of God would not be silent in any way! According to the version, it turns out that there were no saints in Russia at that time, or that the Lord God did not reveal anything to them about the substitution of their king, or that they were afraid for their lives and therefore were hypocritical? Yes, this will not happen! Saint Mitrofan of Voronezh denounced Tsar Peter for the pagan statues on the royal palace in St. Petersburg and even prepared for execution for this. But the king summoned him, talked to him and let him go home. The Monk Seraphim of Sarov spoke of Tsar Peter as a Great Sovereign, but, even with this greatness of the Tsar, God refused him the transfer of the relics of the holy noble Prince Alexander Nevsky to Petersburg.

The tomb was made of silver, but there were no relics in it and no. According to the version, it turns out that all Russian saints were deceived and prayed not for the true Tsar Peter, but for a foreign impostor and enemy of Russia. We, faithful to Christ, cannot allow such a situation! The saints of God could not but know about the substitution (if it really existed) and even more treacherously keep silent about it!

This version paints a terrible picture of the state of the Russian people and the Russian kingdom. What kind of kingdom is this and what kind of people are these, if some foreigner could freely seize power and the royal throne by deceit, and fool them all his life, and after his death too! But since someone decided to promote this version to the masses of people, they needed to compose the story of "the true Tsar Peter the Great." Here is an attempt to return the Russian throne by a war with Russia on the side of Sweden, and facts that coincide with the facts from the feature film "Iron Mask", and other unproven fabrications. And, finally, it is enough to look at the results of the reign of the king with the names Peter the Great and Peter the Great. If, according to the version, the Russian throne was really seized by a foreign agent by deceit, then he should have pursued a policy of destroying the country and weakening its state and military power. We find the exact opposite of this! Let's say the church and faith somehow suffered because of Peter's reforms, but that state itself was transformed and became modern, with a strong army and navy. Why was it necessary for a foreign agent and his puppeteers? After all, under False Dmitry, who reigned in intrigues of the Poles in Moscow, Russia in one year came to a catastrophe and its death! And here science has advanced, and the education system has improved, and production has improved, and Russia has access to the seas, and the state has grown stronger, and it has won victories over foreign troops, and built a new capital, Petersburg, which still stands and surprises with its architecture . Why all this to foreign agents, masons and conspirators who only wanted the collapse of Russia? It was after Peter the Great that the enemies of Russia caught on and began to conspire and commit the murders of the tsars - Paul, Alexander II, Nicholas II, and also contributed to the acceleration of the death of Tsar Alexander III! And at the same time, economically and politically, Russia was developing and strengthening all the time, which was what was terrible for her enemies and ill-wishers. And where does serfdom, as well as vodka? Yes, they were bad things in Russia. But serfdom was nevertheless abolished and abolished, and they fought against drunkenness. But the Grand Duke Vladimir of Kyiv wrote about the love of drinking in Russia. Peter brought not drunkenness, but alcohol trade, economically beneficial to his court and state. And Lomonosov invented vodka, not Tsar Peter. But the passion for drinking alcohol is a sinful passion inspired by demons, not by people. People can only seduce her and give a reason.

Summing up, we can confidently say that we do not have any serious grounds and evidence for accepting this version. Everything is built on assumptions and assumptions with the help of fitted comparisons of different qualities of the same person. Doubles in history were and are. They were and are being used by the powers that be, but not enough to give them their power. The strong are always insured and hold their doubles in such a way that none of us would like to be in their place. No matter how much anyone likes Tsar Peter the Great, no matter what mistakes he makes, but it was he and he also made them.

Why did they let this supposedly “patriotic” version go for a walk? In fact, this version does not solve the issues of history, does not explain the truly past events and does not restore the gaps in history, but harms the Russian people and the Russian world in general. By allowing such a substitution, the Russian people are placed in a very humiliating and unfavorable position. Solid soil is knocked out of the ground, albeit a combed, but still true story, and in return they are presented with the unsteady sand of conjectures and guesswork, or even intentionally false inventions. This brings confusion into the soul of a person (and any confusion, according to the teaching of the fathers of the Church of Christ, comes from demons), temptation, distrust of anyone, despondency and despair. Hence the fragility of views and the complex of the constant fear of being deceived, skepticism, distrust, chaos and loss. And who needs it? Enemies of salvation!

From the very beginning of his reign, Peter gave preference to foreigners, for example, in his first campaign against Azov, he put his drinking companions, drinkers Lefort and Gordon, at the head of the Russian army.

And when he returned from Europe with the embassy, ​​he took with him 800 foreigners, many of whom were not valuable specialists, but simply “natural” managers and adventurers, such as the Dutch Jew Acosta, who played the jester under Peter, the Portuguese Jew Divier or the Polish Jew Shafirov. Peter the Great publicly stated:

“It makes no difference to me whether a person is baptized or circumcised, so long as he only knows his business and is distinguished by decency.”

However, he made one exception: having visited Holland, where there were many Jews, Peter became wary of them, for the historian Solovyov claimed that Peter the Great loved all nations except the Jews. Which confirms the statement of Peter himself in 1702:

“I want ... to see in my country better peoples of the Mohammedan and pagan faith than the Jews. They are swindlers and deceivers. I eradicate evil, not breed; there will be no housing or trade for them in Russia, no matter how hard they try, and no matter how much they bribe their neighbors to me.

However, Peter appointed Divyer (Devier) the first police chief of St. Petersburg, the governor and bestowed the title of count, and Shafirov - vice-chancellor and the title of baron, although then in 1723 he was sentenced to death for embezzlement, replaced by exile; however, later, Divier also got into exile, but this was already after the death of Peter.

“Peter, who tried to push the old tribal Russian families away from the royal throne, brought Divier closer to him. Peter forced Menshikov to marry his sister to Divyer. Leaving St. Petersburg, Catherine entrusted her daughter Natalya and the children of the executed Tsarevich Alexei, Peter and Natalya, to no one else but ... Divyer, ”B. Bashilov noted in his study.

In total, under Peter, about 8 thousand foreigners arrived in Russia. It seems that this number is not large, but given that the foreigners did not go to plow the arable land, but went upstairs to manage, it turned out to be a lot. It's like today - like there are few citizens of Jewish nationality, only 300 thousand, but we see at the top: in the oligarchs, journalists and ministers, almost only Jews.

Peter, without any common sense, fanatically worshiped everything Western, European - he forced his close associates to smoke, drink, participate in collective revels; welcomed Freemasonry, already fashionable in Europe, as the highest degree European education, - On February 10, 1699, Sheremetyev appeared at the ball at Lefort in a German dress and with a bright Maltese cross and other Masonic paraphernalia and received from Peter "the highest mercy." What are Masons, Peter already knew from his European voyage. In addition, the “Master of the Chair” was his favorite Lefort, and the “first warden” was the same favorite - Gordon. The famous Vernadsky, who dealt not only with the Noosphere, in his master's work of 1916 claimed that Peter himself was accepted in Holland into the Knights Templar, “in the Scottish degree of St. Andrew". Most likely, Peter was not a convinced Freemason, more “for brilliance and prestige”, although, judging by his attitude towards the people, he would have been no less talented Freemason than those who operated the guillotine in France.

Peter decided to carry out radical reforms in Russia. What was the need for this?

After the death of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich in 1676, his son Fyodor Alekseevich became the next tsar of Russia, who ruled until his death in 1682, and who, in a short period of his reign, managed to carry out important effective reforms in the army, administration and taxation, tried to cut power powers of the Boyar Duma and the Patriarch. Above, we observed Sophia's reforms. Before Peter the Great, as we saw earlier, Russia was developing quite successfully and steadily - numerous wars were successfully waged, lands were acquired not only in Siberia and Far East, but also in the European part, culture and printing successfully developed.

“It is not true that only Peter began to introduce the Russian people to culture. The assimilation of Western culture began long before Peter. Western learned architects worked in Russia long before Peter the Great, and Boris Godunov began sending Russian youths abroad. But the assimilation of Western European culture proceeded naturally - in a normal way, without extremes ... - our compatriot from Argentina, Boris Bashilov, argued in his study. Under Alexei Mikhailovich (father of Peter the Great), the first theater and the first newspaper already existed. "Cathedral Code" was published unprecedented and for Western Europe circulation - two thousand copies. The “Stepnaya Book” was published - a systematic history of the Muscovite state, “The Royal Book” - an eleven-volume illustrated history of the world, “Azbukovnik” - a kind of encyclopedic dictionary, “Ruler” - Elder Erasmus-Yermolai, “Domostroy” Sylvester ... In the Moscow Archive of the Ministry of Justice before February Revolution hundreds of different kinds of works written in the 17th century were kept.

A. Burovsky noted in his study:

“But it is worth digressing from school textbooks and analyzing authentic historical sources - and we will find that in pre-Petrine Russia of the 17th century there was already everything that is attributed to Peter: from potatoes and tobacco to an excellent fleet and a completely modern army for that time.”

For some reason, Peter is credited with creating a regular Russian army, but this is not true, a lie - the regular army in Russia was created before the reign of Peter the Great by 1681.

Before Peter the Great, there were three problems in Russia: the enslavement of the peasants, as a result of which Russia was periodically shaken by powerful popular uprisings; (2) Alexei Romanov was too exalted and made a big dangerous gap between the people and the tsar, for this reason popular uprisings could greatly weaken Russia; (3) for the development of Russia, access to the seas was needed: the Baltic and Black, and, accordingly, the military and merchant fleet.

Peter the Great began his reforms, passionately desiring to imitate the West, he conceived not only to the envy of Europeans to build a new capital “Northern Paradise” in the swamps, but to dress the whole people in European clothes, to dress all sections of society. Before Peter, they were fond of Western European culture in moderation - Godunov built Kokuy for foreign merchants and sent children to study in European countries, Alexei Romanov taught his children foreign languages, Golitsyn knew the Polish language and dressed in Polish clothes, Sophia introduced teaching foreign languages.

In 1698, Peter issued a decree on changing national clothes to European ones. The forcible imposition of Western culture took forms unprecedented in the history of mankind - special military services cut off beards and long skirts of clothes right on the streets. The people began to actively resist. And so that the people could not resist, Peter issued a decree banning the wearing of pointed knives. In 1700, Peter repeated the decree - all residents of Moscow were ordered to change all their clothes to European ones within two days, and merchants were promised hard labor, quilting with a whip and confiscation of property for trading in Russian clothes.

Special armed units - guardians of Western fashion grabbed passers-by, put them on their knees and cut off the floors of clothes at ground level. The requirement for men's clothing - to narrow the waist, was perceived by Russian peasants and boyars as something very shameful. Men's beards were shaved by force and in the most cruel way. It was possible to pay off shaving - merchants paid 100 rubles for the right to wear a beard, boyars - 60, other townspeople - 30. At that time, this was a lot of money. An exception was made for priests - they were allowed to wear beards.

In Astrakhan, Peter's subordinates ordered the soldiers to uproot their beards, which was the reason for the Astrakhan uprising in 1705. In the petition to the tsar they complained:

“We have become for the Christian faith… In Kazan and in other cities, the Germans are instructed two and three people in the yards and the residents there, and their wives, and children, are embossed and cursed,”

“And the colonels and the Germans, scolding Christianity, caused many hardships for them, innocently beat them in the services, forced them to eat meat on fast days and repaired all kinds of abuse to their wives and children,”

“they beat them on the cheeks and with sticks”, and Colonel Devin “beat the petitioners and maimed them to death” (S. Platonov, “Lectures”).

It seems that Peter deliberately widely used the appointment of foreigners to high positions - the conductors of his "western" domestic policy for their own could pity their own. Peter, with his “perestroika” in the Western manner, brought the people to a frenzy and a nervous breakdown, the people fled not only to the Cossacks, but also to Turkey, realizing that nothing good awaits them there.

The well-known historian Kostomarov, trying to somehow find an excuse for Peter, suggested that Peter did not love the real Russian people, but that ideal of the Russian people (pattern) he invented, which he wanted to create according to the European model. We can add to this - and therefore the real Russian people cut to the European pattern like a butcher who imagines himself a tailor-cutter.

Despite such a frivolous attitude to the status of the church, Peter, with incomprehensible cruelty, pursued the Old Believers who had hidden in the forests for a long time. The Old Believers protested in their own way: 2,700 Old Believers burned themselves in the Paleostrovsky Skete, 1,920 people in the Pudozhsky churchyard.

It seems that, fighting with national clothes, national rituals, Old Believers, Peter fought with everything national, with the original Russian, authentic, with the Russian soul. There is no other way to explain why Peter organized the collection of ancient chronicles from all corners of Russia and monasteries and destroyed them, like the entire Kazan archive. When the year 7208 was going on in Russia not “from the creation of the world”, as they usually write, because it is clear that the “world” in any sense was created much earlier, but from the end of the “Great War” of our ancestors with Chinese civilization, then Peter decided to change the old Russian a calendar that even the baptist Vladimir and later the Christian Church did not dare to change. And on December 19, 7208, he introduced by his decree the European calendar - 1699. Peter also introduced New Year in European style - from the first of January, and before that it was from September 1, with the beginning of the withering of Nature. By the way, our ancestors were still reckoning from a more distant period - from the onset of the Ice Age, the “Great Cold”, according to which, for example, 2008 is 13016.

Thus, Peter the Great cut off more than five and a half thousand years of national history.

“The Russian educated classes, after and thanks to the reforms of Peter, culturally found themselves in a peculiar position, as it were, “not remembering kinship,” Prince Svyatopolk-Mirsky recorded reality in his book.

"Peter's reform, as sea ​​sponge erased family memories. It seems that together with European clothes, a Russian nobleman was first born into the world. Centuries are forgotten…”, Klyuchevsky wrote.

Peter the Great not only changed the calendar, but also celebrated the New Year in an original way. He celebrated New Year 1700 with wild merriment in the company of the All-Joking and All-Drunken Cathedral for two weeks. The inhabitants of Moscow were in fear and horror, they had no time for New Year's fun, or rather, now the New Year's Eve performed by Peter and his company looked like this - a company of 100–200 people broke into the houses of residents, ate and drank everything and demanded more, then she cheerfully searched for hidden supplies, again ate and drank everything, often cheerfully and jokingly raped her wife and daughters. During this revelry, according to R.K. Massey - Peter behaved “like an unbridled youth”, this is a mild form of saying “unbridled stallion”.

“The inability to restrain himself, the desire to seize literally every woman who could please him, led to a logical result: more than 100 bastards of Peter are known. Tellingly, he never helped them, explaining it very simply - they say, if they are worthy, they will break through on their own, ”said A. Burovsky.

Then the whole festive campaign of Peter's moral freaks grabbed the things and jewelry they liked, calling them Christmas gifts, the money they found and moved on noisily, frightening the passers-by with dashing and choosing the next house-victim for a "joke" stay.

Peter's satanic attitude was not only to his native people, but, accordingly, to his native Nature, as, for example, above we observe the barbaric cutting down of oak groves in the Voronezh province. The historian Klyuchevsky also noted this fact: “a valuable oak for Baltic Fleet- a different log was valued in the then hundred rubles, lying in whole mountains along the shores and islands of Lake Ladoga ... ". The scale of construction at Peter's was enormous, and the scale of mismanagement was of the same magnitude. Then Peter rushed to the other extreme and made the "extreme people" - under pain of death, defiantly placing gallows on the edge of the forests, forbade the peasants to cut down the forests for their own needs. Now the peasants, without special permission and bribes, could neither build a house, nor a barn, nor heat a stove.

Peter's admirer, the incorrigible Westerner A. Herzen, wrote about Peter the Great: - and this for at least six generations - the command of Peter the Great: stop being Russian and you will render a great service to mankind" (Herzen's article "The New Phase of Russian Culture").

This terrible direction of the blow of the cosmopolitan Peter the Great was explained by the famous Karamzin:

“By eradicating ancient skills, presenting them as ridiculous, stupid, praising and introducing foreign ones, the Sovereign of Russia humiliated the Russians in their own hearts”, “Peter did not want to delve into the truth that the spirit of the people constitutes the moral power of the state, like the physical one, necessary for their firmness” .

The bloody despot and the monster had interesting relationship with your loved ones. We observed earlier - Peter, for the sake of peace of mind of his mistress Anna Mons and his tonsure as a nun, and exiled his lawful wife and queen to a distant monastery. And he showered the “Kokuisk Queen” with gifts and established a state salary. Peter was delighted with his mistress and in January 1703 he gave “Monsikha” the Dudinskaya volost in the Kozelsk district - 295 households, and began to tell others that he would soon make her the lawful queen, marry her. But a month later, Peter made the most unpleasant, terrible discovery for himself ...

Having recovered a little from the Narva defeat, Peter, having discovered that the Swedish king Charles the Twelfth was stuck with his army in battles in the depths of Poland, at the end of 1701 sent B.P. Sheremetyeva (1652–1719). Unexpectedly for Peter, Sheremetyev successfully walked through Livonia: he defeated the Swedish barrage detachments, took several cities without a fight, robbed them, then burned them and returned with rich captured booty: valuables, cattle, horses, many prisoners, mostly civilians. And inspired by Peter often with military campaigns in the Baltic lands. In 1702, Russian troops besieged the important strategic fortress of Noteburg, located at the source of the Neva from Lake Ladoga. In February 1703, Peter arrived to personally lead the assault. The assault was a success - the captured Noteburg Peter gave another foreign name- Shlisselburg, which in translation is “key-city”, it seems that Peter did not have the idea of ​​​​building St. Petersburg yet, and he considered Shlisselburg as a supporting fortress - the key to the Baltic. During the magnificent celebrations in the fortress on the occasion of the victory, Peter got letters from the Saxon envoy Koenigsek, who participated in this campaign.

The letters turned out to be from Anna Mons, beloved “Monsikha”, who, as it turned out, in the absence of Peter did not waste time in vain, did not get bored - she had long been Koenigsek’s mistress, that is, she had long instructed Peter, the king, “horns”. The state of a normal, deceived man with wounded vanity is understandable, but one can only guess about Peter’s state at that moment ... Especially since in the letters the “Kokuy Queen” spoke of Peter, to put it mildly, impartially, complained about his barbaric habits. At the same time, “Monsikha” sent letters “with hearts” to Peter ...

Despite the Kokui education of Anna Lefort, the long-standing "love" prestigious relationship between her and the tsar, despite numerous expensive gifts from Peter, Anna Mons did not want to connect her life with a monster; she did not want to endure his drunkenness, unbridledness, depravity, orgies, abnormality, she wanted to marry a normal cultured person.

In addition, it was unpleasant for her when Peter casually fell into the bedroom of her best friend Elena Fademrekh. There are several versions: according to one, the letters “Monsikha” got to Peter by accident, according to another, the “kind” courier slipped him “by mistake”, according to the third, during the victorious feast, Koenigsek accidentally drowned in a strange way and ominous letters were found in his things. Most likely, one of the first versions is true, and, knowing the character of Peter, we can say that having discovered treason, Peter in a rage ordered the competitor to be drowned, and he watched it with pleasure.

Judging by the subsequent actions, Peter, it seems, loved Ankhen very much, because he did not tonsure her as a nun, did not imprison her in a monastery and did not cut off her head, as he did with Mary Hamilton in a similar situation, although close relations with Mary were for several months, but only limited her freedom to house arrest, and then watched for a long time and took revenge, crap.

Embittered, Peter stopped communicating with Anna. But, when in 1706 Anna Mons wanted to marry the Prussian envoy to Russia, Baron Johann von Keyserling, the jealous and vindictive Peter, in order to prevent marriage, accused Anna of divination. The investigation into this case lasted a whole year, during which 30 people from Anna's entourage were arrested and subjected to severe torture. Only through the stubborn efforts of the diplomat-groom in 1707 the investigation was terminated, but almost everything donated by Peter was taken away and confiscated.

Probably, Keyserling loved Anna very much, for for several years he sought permission to marry Anna and, finally, having received it from Peter, he married her in June 1711. And it seems - a happy ending - for Anna, for both, but it wasn’t there - as soon as after the “honey period” Baron Keyserling drove away from home, he died under mysterious circumstances. Most likely, Peter still tried to cruelly take revenge on Anna; It has long been noticed that nobility is completely absent in people of the satanic warehouse of the psyche. Anna died of consumption in 1714. Peter all this time was not alone and was quite happy with another beloved woman; this story is more tragic for Peter.

During a campaign in Livonia, Sheremetyev's troops captured the city of Marienburg, where Marta Skavronskaya, born in 1684, worked as a cook and laundress in the family of pastor Gluck. According to one version, her parents died of the plague, and her uncle, the Swedish quartermaster Johann Rabe, gave the orphan to Pastor Gluck's house. The pastor baptized her and raised her. But when Martha gave birth to a child, the pastor hurried to marry her to the Swedish soldier Johann Kruse.

And two months after their wedding, Russian troops entered Marienburg, or rather Russian ones, because after the Narva defeat, Sheremetyev had multinational troops.

“Sheremetyev crossed over the Narova, went to visit Estonia in the same way as he visited last year in Livonia. The guests were the same: Cossacks, Kalmyks, Tatars, Bashkirs, and they stayed as before ... Sheremetyev entered Veshenberg, the city of Rakov (Rakvere), famous in ancient Russian history, and heaps of ashes remained on the site of a beautiful city. The same fate befell Weissenstein, Fellin, Ober-Pallen, Ruin; the devastation of Livonia was completed,” wrote R. Massey about two campaigns in the Baltic states in 1701 and 1702.

Marta Skavronska, judging by her surname, was Polish, because the root of the surname is translated only into Polish - “skavronek” is a lark, and in the Polish way the popular surname sounds - Skavronska. But Marta is a popular name among the Germans and Swedes, and the Poles did not take Swedish and German names. It seems that Marta's nationality reveals the Old Testament name of her father - Samuel, and the wise Jew adjusted to the historical situation - when Poland was before Riga, the surname was Polish, and with the advent of the Swedes, Swedish names appeared in the children. And the surname of the uncle of the quartermaster Rabe - among the Germans and Swedes is the same as in Ukraine or in Russia - Rabinovich. I. N. Shornikova and V. P. Shornikov in their study claim that Rabe was Martha's husband, but there is more information that it was Kruse after all.

Marta Skavronskaya turned out to be the booty of the Cossacks and Bashkirs of Sheremetyev, then Colonel Bauer noticed the 18-year-old brunette and took her to the officers' tents, then Sheremetyev noticed Marta and took her to his headquarters quarters. The trophy beauty was so good and affectionate that Sheremetyev brought her with him to Moscow, where Menshikov noticed her, and Sheremetyev did not argue and be greedy, and at a booze in Menshikov's house on March 1, 1704, the owner boasted of his acquisition to Peter the Great. The Russian tsar became interested and checked whether his beloved friend had lied ... The young trophy washerwoman could not do anything, she had no education, pastor Gluck did not teach her to read and write, but during her adventures in captivity she learned to please men well, to be affectionate and cheerful, maybe God gave her just that talent. But this is what Peter the Great valued most of all, this is what he called love. “Two boots of steam” came together. Martha moved in with Peter.

Peter began to quickly heal spiritual wounds after Ankhen. People around noticed that Martha was not afraid of Peter in fits of anger, and only she was able to calm him boldly and kindly in this state, relieve nervous tension. Peter also liked Martha's cheerful moral position - she watched his many hobbies, did not get jealous, did not quarrel, but only joked and laughed at his frequent romantic adventures. And sometimes there was something to laugh at - once again "having" the wife of some officer Praskovya, who liked him, Peter caught syphilis or some other unpleasant venereal infection - a disease from her, and terribly angry ordered her husband to flog his wife - "unfit Froska” (A. B.).

In connection with this story and the story with Martha, we can recall the statement of the wife of the famous philosopher Pythagoras, very respected in Greece for the wisdom of Fiano. When she was asked: “On what day is a woman cleansed after a man?”, Fiano answered: “After her husband immediately, and after someone else’s never.”

Peter was comfortable with Marta, after another "victory" over someone's wife, he complimented her: "nothing can compare with you." So happily and began to live. Peter the Great conspired the laundress Marta Samuilovna in the Russian way - he called her Catherine. Under pain of death, others were forbidden to mention the origin of Catherine and her real name. Martha-Catherine showed very good health - she easily bore him children, there were 11 of them. Of these, she gave birth to two daughters before their wedding, that is, they were illegitimate.

In 1708, Marta was baptized for the third time, she converted to Orthodoxy, her godfather at the time of the rebaptism, Peter's son, Alexei, was born, after which Martha was called Ekaterina Alekseevna.

And it turned out an unpleasant incident - Peter married his spiritual granddaughter.

When, after the victory over the Swedes near Poltava in 1709, Peter went on the Prut campaign against Turkey in 1711, Catherine accompanied him on the campaign, and even commanded the soldiers, and when Peter was threatened with captivity on the banks of the Prut and the Swedish king already threatened to lead his prisoner on a rope, then Catherine participated in the most difficult negotiations with the Turks. The Turks did not bring the matter to capture. And Peter returned safe and sound to Russia and still managed to grab the daughter of the Valam (Moldavian) prince Cantemir, the famous poet, whom Peter raped and decided to take her to Russia, and imprisoned in reserve in the village of Chernaya Dirt, then renamed to Tsarskoye Selo, but after that he “forgot” about the Moldavian beauty according to the principle “neither to myself nor to anyone”, and she died in captivity. Again, one can emphasize the cynical “mismanagement” characteristic of Peter - 27285 people died in the Prut campaign, of which only 4800 died in battles with Turkish troops, the remaining 22 thousand died because of Peter the Great - as a result of the disgusting organization of the military campaign: from hunger, cold and diseases.

After the tragic Prut campaign, Peter married Catherine in 1712, and Catherine officially becomes a bihusband.

“Since 1702, any mention of Johann Cruz has disappeared. Disappears, however, only from Russian sources. The Swedes know very well where the lawful husband of the Russian Empress went. Johann Kruse served the Swedish king for many more years, and in his old age in the garrisons on the Aland Islands ... Johann also did not start a family and explained to the pastor that he already had a wife and he would not take sin on his soul ... He outlived his legal wife, Martha- Catherine, but not by much, having died in 1733. All of the above explains very well why in tsarist times it was believed that Johann Kruse was missing ...

Marta-Catherine was the legal wife of Johann Kruse. She remained her even when Peter officially married her in 1712. She only became a bigamous woman and, moreover, in the event of a trial, she had to become the wife of Johann, as the king who married her 10 years earlier, ”A. Burovsky noted in his study.

Now Marta-Catherine became the legal wife of the tsar, that is, the Russian queen, and her children could claim the Russian throne. Since then, Marta has become jealous of the eldest son of Peter from Evdokia Lopukhina - Alexei, and his family.

A year earlier, Peter forcibly married Alexei on October 11, 1711 to a relative of the wife of Emperor Charles the Sixth, Sophia Charlotte-Christine of Brunswick-Wolfebuttel, for Peter the Great built some intricate strategic plans. Charlotte came to Russia with her friends and stayed away from the Russians, constantly demanding money from Alexei, it was difficult to talk about love in this family.

The year 1715 turned out to be a turning point in Alexei's relationship with his father, Peter. Since 1710, Peter the Great became permanently ill - he developed all the accumulated diseases from a wild life, and first of all syphilis. Peter became even more irritable and ferocious. Already in 1711, his illnesses greatly disturbed him, and at the beginning of the Prut campaign he was forced to urgently leave for treatment in Karlsbad on the waters. After the wedding with Catherine, Peter rushed about in search of effective treatment and saving his life - in 1712 he went to Russian Pomerania for treatment, then again to Karlsbad, then to the Czech Teplice. But there were only temporary improvements, but in general the situation worsened.

In 1715, Peter's health deteriorated completely, Peter became so ill that he already confessed and took communion, that is, he thought that he might die. And the question of a successor to power arose “edge-on”. And in this situation, all the accumulated dissatisfaction of Peter with his son Alexei sharply escalated.

Alexei greatly irritated Peter with his dissimilarity, he was a balanced, educated person, he knew a lot foreign languages, was not fond of war games, was normal, did not drink in such quantities and in such companies, did not organize "all-drunk cathedrals" and orgies, he did not have greedy authority and cruelty, etc. - he was a stranger to Peter in spirit, he did not have that native Satanism in him. And Peter had no choice - there were no other sons, although Peter understood that, to put it mildly, Alexei was not happy that Peter had removed his mother from the throne for nothing and even imprisoned the innocent in a monastery. In 1709, Peter even sent Alexei to Dresden to study at a fortification school, hoping to captivate him with military affairs, seeing that Alexei was undoubtedly an intelligent person. But Alexei did not become different, he remained himself.

The second Queen Martha Catherine could not give birth to Peter's son - the heir, she bore him two daughters before marriage and afterward diligently gave birth to children to Peter every year, but they all turned out to be girls. Catherine zealously and anxiously looked in the direction of Alexei's family - another heir would not have been born there. In 1714, a daughter was born in the family of Alexei, but the next year - in 1715, the son Peter, the future Emperor Peter Petrovich, was born. The dynasty continued: Peter the Great - Alexei Petrovich - Peter Alekseevich. But fate once again smiled insidiously - in 1715, Marta-Catherine finally gave birth to a son and named, of course, Peter. Now a washerwoman from Livonia with a Polish surname, a Swedish name and Jewish roots could compete for the establishment of her own dynasty in Russia. A fierce unequal struggle began.

The tone of Peter the Great's attitude towards his eldest son changes dramatically, Peter in 1715 sends a letter to Alexei, although both are in St. Petersburg, nearby:

“For the sake of staying like this, if you think to be neither fish nor meat, it’s impossible, but either change your temper or unhypocritically honor yourself as an heir, or become a monk.”

It was indecent blackmail, intimidation, but most importantly, the demand of the impossible, and Peter understood this very well, but he hated his own son, who was alien to him, and his beloved Marta actively pushed him to this, incited him. From that moment on, Peter began to spread rot, to persecute his son Alexei. Peter once again demonstrated the absence of any nobility and all his dark baseness.

Alexei simply physically could not change his personality, and he did not want to become a monk at all - he had a family: a young beautiful wife, imposed by his father, and two children. And Alexei in 1715 refused the throne. But Alexei's troubles didn't end there. In early 1716, Alexei's wife Charlotte-Christina died. By the beginning of 1716, Peter recovered a little and went to Permont for treatment, and in 1717 he went to the waters in Amsterdam. During all these trips around Europe, he tried to combine business with pleasure: he was treated and conducted active diplomatic negotiations with European leaders in order to put together a bloc against Sweden and Turkey, but no one except Poland wanted to get involved with him.

But throughout this voyage and treatment, Peter sent numerous threatening letters to Alexei - trying to force him to go to the monastery, to take the veil, despite the fact that Alexei renounced the throne in favor of the son of Martha-Catherine. In a letter dated January 19, 1716, Peter wrote: “If you don’t do it, then I will deal with you as with a villain.”

In September 1716, Peter repeated his demand even more harshly. Moreover, it is very strange - Peter did not make any specific claims to Alexei. Alexei understood that if he refused to take the veil as a monk, he would be in danger, and his children would be in big trouble.

But Alexei did not want to leave society, children; moreover, during this period, “Cupid joked” - Alexei managed to fall in love with a captive peasant woman, a serf, a slave of his mentor N. Vyazemsky, Efrosinya Fedorovna. Alexei understood that his father would never allow him to marry his beloved. Until Peter returned to Russia, Alexei decided to flee the country, away from Peter, and went with Efrosinya to Vienna.

Upon learning of his son's flight, Peter the Great was furious, it was perceived as a shame - the son ran away from his father-tsar, Peter's pride was badly injured, and dissatisfaction with his son reached extreme ferocity.

He immediately demanded that Austria extradite his son. But the authorities of this country treated Alexei humanely, did not want to shackle him and send him to Peter, but suggested that Peter solve family troubles peacefully, through negotiations. Alexey went even further - to Naples, and from this city he sent a letter to the Senate in Russia explaining his act. Peter's diplomats, Tolstoy and Rumyantsev, pursued Alexei throughout Europe in order to convey Peter's false promises.

And at this moment, attention should be paid to an important point - about which dozens of books and textbooks vilely lie - about Alexei's betrayal; abroad, Alexei did not conduct any anti-state activities, did not organize any conspiracy: neither inside Russia nor outside it did he cobble together any foreign blocs against Russia and did not persuade European monarchs to go to war against Russia or remove Peter from the throne for the sake of his power - there is not a single evidence, not a single fact. One can only record that Alexei did not like Peter's attitude towards his people, his internal cruel policy, and he expressed his criticism in conversations with foreigners. But about 99% of Russians were dissatisfied with Peter's domestic policy, almost everyone except for a small handful of close associates. And everything that modern authors have written and are writing against Alexei is a repetition, a rehash of the completely unfounded accusations of Peter the Great himself.

After Peter almost died in 1715, the attitude towards the “sick elderly lion” of his “faithful” associates changed, and events that were previously unthinkable became possible. Peter, despite his “love” for Martha-Catherine and his illnesses, tried not to forget his “bed registry” - it was a kind of plan that cannot be called “a plan to conquer the hearts of the beauties he liked in the near future”, but something I don't want to say vulgar things. And Peter liked the lady-in-waiting of Catherine - Maria Hamilton, who came from an ancient Scottish family. As many authors write, Peter, who was ill with many venereal diseases, “recognized in the young beauty talents that it was impossible not to look at with lust” - and began to satisfy his lust. A few months later, for some reason, Peter suddenly “fell out of love” with Mary, stopped paying attention to her, most likely went further along the “bed register”. Mary was immediately "picked up" by Peter's close associates, after Peter "to have love" with the former favorite of the king was very prestigious.

During the long absence of Peter in 1716-1717. in Russia, the mess and various outrages have intensified. Money was stolen in monstrous volumes, and Queen Marta, Catherine the First, having decided that her status could not be stronger: Peter adores her, she still gave birth to an heir, and the main competitor refused the throne and went on the run, decided not to torment her healthy body and to allow oneself freedom in pleasures, especially since the “love” of Peter, in the same understanding of “love” and Marta, began to weaken due to his illnesses.

“The number of Catherine's fleeting hobbies was approaching two dozen. Of the future members of the Supreme Privy Council, only the pathologically cautious Osterman and Dmitry Golitsyn, who continued to look at the “mother queen” with arrogant disgust, did not take advantage of her graces ... ”, A. Burovsky noted in his study. Peter the second time turned out to be “horned”, but he did not know about it yet.

When Peter returned to Russia in 1717, declared Martha-Catherine queen and discovered that important state papers had disappeared from his office, the tsar's office, they began to look for spies. At this time, the old trusted batman Ivan Orlov was on duty - and they began to torture him with predilection. Orlov swore and swore that he was sinful in many ways, but not in espionage. Among the sins he listed, it turned out that he had a long-standing affair with Maria Hamilton. It would be better if he didn't say that for his own good. The maid of honor, under torture, admitted that she had cheated on the tsar (!) And that she was forced to have several abortions, intrauterine poisoning, including from Peter. Cheating on the king is high treason, and a new investigation has been launched. Peter decided to act in an original way - he went, told everything to Catherine, hoping that she would destroy her ward in a rage, but she reacted calmly and said that she had known everything for a long time and forgives the maid of honor. Disappointed Peter had to deal with the fate of the girl himself. But at this time Alexei was fraudulently persuaded to return to Russia, and Peter postponed the proceedings. Alexey believed Peter's promises - not to bring him and Efrosinya any harm, Peter even promised to allow them to get married - when they returned.

But immediately upon crossing the Russian border on February 3, 1718, Alexei was arrested, and an investigation began, Peter accused Alexei of treason. Alexei's entire entourage was subjected to torture with predilection, to which Alexei was dragged and forced to look at the torment of loved ones.

After that, many people who “incorrectly” influenced Alexei were executed: Kikin, Afanasiev, Dubrovsky, priest-confessor Yakov Ignatiev. During the investigation, they made an unpleasant discovery - there were too many dissatisfied with the king, but they did not execute everyone. Peter, on the other hand, blamed Aleksey’s free thinking mainly as “bearded men”, that is, priests, complaining that his father had one (i.e., Nikon), and he had thousands.

In the course of this investigation, another trouble for Peter was revealed - naturally, they remembered Evdokia Fedorovna Lopukhina, who was in the monastery - “old woman Elena”, and began to torture her entourage for involvement in the conspiracy, and discovered Evdokia Fedorovna’s love affair with Major Stepan Glebov. Peter thought that the first beauty of Russia, imprisoned in a distant monastery, had been in isolation for 20 years and should have died a long time ago from injustice, loneliness and longing. And Peter raised a cry about another treason, began another investigation.

It turned out that in 1709, Major Stepan Bogdanovich Glebov was recruiting in the vicinity of the monastery and stopped by to look at the queen, who no longer lived in the monastery, but nearby in the village as a monk - “secretly a laywoman”. A beautiful love broke out between them; Glebov began to visit Lopukhina, bringing her warm clothes and food. After Peter's marriage to Martha-Ekaterina in 1712, relations between Lopukhina and Glebov became close. Although traveling all over Russia for work, Glebov did not often visit Evdokia, but judging by the surviving nine letters of Evdokia, they felt happy for the last 6 years, here is an excerpt from one letter:

“My light, my father, my soul, my joy, how can I be in the world without you! Oh, my dear friend, why are you so dear to me! I no longer love you, by God! Oh my dear, write me back, please at least a little. Do not leave me for the sake of Christ, for the sake of God. Forgive, forgive, my soul, my friend!”

Pyotr didn’t give a damn about Lopukhin for a long time, he forgot about her existence, but this story hurt not so much his masculine vanity, but his sense of ownership, and he was very angry that it turned out that Lopukhina didn’t suffer much in the distance alone and even happy.

The entire environment of Evdokia was subjected to torture, including her confessor Fyodor Pustynny and Bishop Dosifei of Rostov, who was wheeled, then his head was cut off, and his head was put on a stake in a public place. Peter would have a good reason to “disperse with might and main” and get a lot of black pleasure.

For six weeks in a row, “doctors” Peter tortured Major Glebov. They tortured them for so long, because Stepan Bogdanovich held on very steadfastly and courageously and did not say anything against the honor of the legitimate tsarina Evdokia Feodorovna. A certain Player reported to Peter: "Major Stepan Glebov, tortured in Moscow with a terribly whip, red-hot iron, burning coals, tied to a post on a board with wooden nails for three days, did not confess to anything." At that time, the most notorious criminal, the traitor, was given a maximum of 15 lashes with a whip, and Glebov was inflicted 34, actually leaving him without skin.

Peter was furious, the question - to “break” the hero was fundamental for him. Peter himself, with his wild imagination, took part in the torture, but Major Glebov held on. Then Peter the Great came up with a torture-execution, which was not practiced in Russia at that time - he decided to impale him alive, and in order for Glebov to suffer longer and worse, Peter calculated and built a special stake with a crossbar so that the stake would not pierce quickly through and death was not quick.

During the execution on the Red Square of Moscow on March 15, 1718, surrounded by a crowd of onlookers, Glebov courageously endured terrible torment on a stake, and Peter, who was nearby, maliciously enjoying his torment, begged Glebov to confess the crime - if not before Peter, then before death - before God . Stepan Glebov answered the monster well: “You must be as stupid as a tyrant… Go, monster,” and spat in Peter’s face, adding: Get out and let those who you didn’t give the opportunity to live in peace die in peace. The enraged tyrant was defeated by the strength of the spirit of the martyr. Peter also tried to mock the dying man angrily - on his orders, jokingly, they put on the martyr a hat and threw on a sheepskin coat - so that he would not freeze and die ahead of time and spoil the fun for the king.

At 18:00, Glebov was slowly dying a painful death, Archimandrite Lopatinsky, Priest Anofry, and Hieromonk Markel, who wrote in a report: “didn’t bring them any repentance,” were “watching” nearby in anticipation of repentance. On the second day, feeling the nearness of death, Stepan Bogdanovich asked these three to take communion before his death, but all three turned out to be cowards, they were afraid of Peter's discontent and refused the martyr, with this all of the above "clergy" committed a terrible sin.

Peter the Great was indignant at his impotence, he was defeated, his royal and personal pride was struck - Peter the Great was sure that he, Peter, was “the coolest”, powerful and all-powerful king. For three and a half years, the defeated Peter rushed about with his indignation and wounded pride, perhaps he had tormenting nightmarish bloody dreams, - and from the other world, the invincible courageous Major Stepan Glebov looked at him with a wise contemptuous smile. And Peter could not stand it and decided to fight him again, to attack him together with the Holy Synod - on August 15, 1721, Peter the Great ordered the Holy Synod to condemn Stepan Glebov and anathematize him with eternal damnation.

It seems that Peter was not even pleased with the final victory of the Russian army over the Swedes in the naval battle near Grengam Island on July 27, 1720, and the end of the protracted Northern War, fixed in an agreement with Sweden in the same August 1721. It was more important for him, the main thing was to defeat Major Glebov.

The synod pulled with the execution of the will of the king. Then Peter decided to compensate for his internal defeat with the delight of pride - he ordered the Senate to give him titles, to call him: the Great, Emperor and Father of the Fatherland - everything that his imagination was capable of. And the Senate in October 1721 in a solemn atmosphere carried out the will of Peter. After that, the “bearded men” did not contradict the will of the Great Emperor and the Father of the Fatherland - on November 22, 1721, the Holy Synod met and the “spiritual hierarchs” obediently condemned the “evil criminal” and betrayed them to eternal damnation.

Did Peter feel better after that? Unknown; in my opinion, it only sweetened the bitterness a little, especially in the remaining few years of his life, he was expected to face further defeats. The offended washerwoman queen Marta Catherine the First, deprived of titles, was indignant, and by order of Peter the Great, on December 23, 1721, the Senate made her a New Year's gift - presented the title of Empress.

Let's go back to 1718, after the execution of Stepan Glebov. The death verdict was passed by Peter and his son Alexei. The court headed by Menshikov sentenced Alexei to death. Or rather, at the behest of Peter, the court sentenced Alexei to death.

And on June 26, 1718, as noted in the garrison book of the Peter and Paul Fortress, at 8 o'clock in the morning Peter arrived at the fortress to Alexei with 9 officials - to personally execute Alexei or personally attend his execution. How Alexei was killed turned out to be a mystery, and is still unknown, one can only guess what the sophisticated Peter could come up with for his son. The next day - June 27, this earthly Satan was having fun with his "most drunken cathedral", widely, wildly celebrating the anniversary of the Battle of Poltava.

By this time, the investigation “in the case” of Maria Hamilton had been going on for more than a year. With her, Peter acted in an original, vindictive way: although she never gave birth, but had abortions, she was “sewn” with some abandoned newborn found dead, and this was the basis for Peter to execute his former mistress. Maria begged him in public until the very last second. Peter himself brought the Scottish beauty to the executioner on March 14, 1719. After that, the people witnessed the “famous scene” - Peter the Great raised the severed head of Mary Hamilton, read a long lecture on anatomy to those around him, then the monster kissed the lips of the severed head and threw it into the mud.

Try to answer the question - was Peter the Great a man?

By order of the tsar, the subordinates washed the severed head, put it in alcohol and placed it in a glass vessel in the museum - in the Kunstkamera, where Peter often went to relax and admire its beauty - freaks and severed heads.

For two years, Peter was not engaged in state affairs, but in the investigation, torture, and executions.

“The country turned out to be virtually ruled by no one; executive discipline was monstrous, theft of officials became the norm. Even the old employees, who started under Alexei Mikhailovich, were corrupted by the lawlessness organized by the tsar himself ...

The Financial College demanded reporting from the provinces, and in 1718 they sent out requests throughout the country: to send statistics of income and expenses. Not a single piece of paper was sent by any province; in 1719 they were reminded… again of silence,” noted A. Burovsky in his research.

But on a personal level, everything would be fine - all the “enemies” - traitors were executed, a complete “victory!”. Braunschweig-Luneburg resident F.Kh. Weber, describing the celebration of the New Year 1719 in St. Petersburg, noted that “the tsar likened himself to Patriarch Noah, who still looked with indignation at the ancient Russian world ...”. As you can see, Peter is already 47 years old and he never fell in love with Russia.

In 1719, a sad event occurred for Peter - the last son from Martha-Catherine, Peter Petrovich, the planned heir, died of illness. Peter fell into apathy and spleen, his illness intensified, and after much thought, Peter in 1722 changed the centuries-old legislation on succession to the throne, introduced the emperor’s right to appoint the heir himself in order to prevent the grandson of Peter Alekseevich, the son of the executed Alexei, from the throne, and put him on the throne before her death, a thrice baptized big-husband Jewish woman with a Russian-Swedish name and a Polish surname. At the same time, various kinds of adventurers got a chance to take the Russian throne - such as Menshikov, who could hope that after the death of Peter, his long-time concubine could transfer the throne to him, appoint him emperor, because it was thanks to him that this laundress became queen and empress.

During this period, Peter was told that in the south of internal strife, Persia actually collapsed, and it would not hurt to snatch something from her. And Peter moved a huge army against Persia, which easily, without much resistance, reached Baku. Further progress was stopped by the Ottoman army approaching to help Persia, as a result of which Peter was forced to sign a peace treaty in September 1723 that was beneficial for Russia - Persia ceded the Caucasus to Russia from Dagestan to Baku. But all material and human efforts, human sacrifice turned out to be in vain, because Russia, greatly weakened during the reign of Peter the Great, after his death, did not dare to fight with Persia and, according to the Reshtek Treaty of 1732 and the Ganja Treaty of 1735, everything conquered peacefully returned to Persia back.

If in the Prut campaign about 5 thousand Russian soldiers and officers died in battle, and 22 thousand died through the fault of Peter as a result of poor organization of the campaign - from cold and hunger, then how many lives did Peter the Great ruin this time in Persian campaign I don't know.

In 1723, Peter the Great was forced to pass a death sentence for embezzlement on his friend, the Jew P.P. Shafirov (1669–1739), but at the last moment he relented and replaced the execution with exile.

52-year-old Peter already felt very bad and took care of the throne - in May 1724 he arranged a grand coronation ceremony for his beloved Martha-Catherine, after whom he previously named a city in Siberia (Sverdlovsk) in 1723. But as already mentioned above, from about 1717, Marta-Catherine “went on a spree” and had many lovers, many knew about this, except for Peter, the courtiers kept the secret in solidarity. She did not stop her pleasures by becoming queen, and empress, and crowned. A few months after the coronation, Peter suddenly suddenly discovered a terrible truth for himself - his beloved Martha-Catherine, the empress had long been cheating on him with the chamberlain, had horned the emperor, betrayed him! Another treason! And with whom? - with Willim Mons, the brother of that Anna Mons, who also instructed the “horns” of the king. Peter was in shock.

“... There is also evidence that since 1724 Peter simply became impotent, and the “mother queen” finally went into all serious trouble,” A. Burovsky noted in his study. In any case, Peter was definitely very ill, and after drinking a huge amount of alcohol he could completely weaken, and 12 years younger than him, Marta-Catherine was fragrant with health, and 4 years younger than her, Willim was the courtier of Apollo and “love” was understood in a Petrovsky way.

The severely ill Peter the Great was furious and indescribably furious, jumping, yelling, poking a hunting knife at the walls and at everything that came to hand, almost crippled his daughters, broke the door. This was the last person close to him, and he betrayed. Menshikov had long since greatly disappointed Peter with his greed and cunning, and was already in great disgrace. Peter was devastated, disappointed with life, lost all meaning in life, completely alone. This was a natural end to the monster's dirty life: he started with dirt - spent his whole life in mud and blood - and ended his life with mud and blood. He mocked at lives, at Life, and Life responded to him in the same way. Fearing to inflict more pain on himself and make more “discoveries”, Peter interrupted the investigation and cut off Mons’s head on November 16, 1724, put the severed head on a pole on Trinity Square and ominously brought Martha-Catherine to show her lover’s head, not realizing that it was his same shame.

Although he tried to hide his shame, disguise it - the verdict said that Mons would be executed for bribes. Then Peter ordered the competitor's head to be sealed in alcohol and placed in the Kunstkamera. Other betrayals did not become known to Peter, because those close to him who were tied up in secret were not “intrinsically” interested in this, and first of all, his closest friend Menshikov, who, according to some historians, had not broken off contact with his mistress since 1703. Shocked, Peter began to quickly grow weak, drove his wife into separate rooms, then began to impose sanctions: he forbade the courtiers to accept orders and instructions from the empress, then he imposed a “questor” on issuing money to her, and the empress had to borrow money from the courtiers; Peter then tore up his testament to the throne. And it is not known what Peter would have gone to in his rage, or rather, it is known if it were not for his sudden death on January 28, 1725.

It sounds paradoxical or natural - but everyone benefited from the death of a tyrant. And many researchers tend to conclude that Peter's death was hastened, "helped" - poisoned, and in the first place, beloved Marta-Ekaterina and "friend" of childhood Menshikov were interested in this. For if Peter could finish his famous phrase, interrupted by death: “Give everything ...”, then most likely it would be a disaster for them, and so they are completely free, already without any fear of Peter, spent two years at the pinnacle of power in continuous drunkenness and orgies, when, as visiting foreigners wrote, at the Russian imperial court day and night merged into one for this occupation. A. Burovsky noted:

“Peter, as if on purpose, did everything possible so that after him literally nothing was left. He killed a smart, good son who could have ruled after him; He placed a woman on the throne, mortally dangerous for himself and completely unsuitable for the role of empress. Finally, as if on purpose, he brought to power people who were completely incapable of standing at the helm of the state.”

Peter himself gathered all his palace “team”, gave birth, and during his lifetime united them, was the center of their attention and “fastening cement”, but with the death of Peter, this “cement” rallying together disappeared abruptly, freeing his subordinates, and they are free from him , being sometimes in a sober and sane mind, they rigidly intrigued among themselves, built intrigues on each other. The famous historian Klyuchevsky remarked: "They began to fool around with Russia immediately after the death of the converter, they hated each other and began to trade Russia as their prey."

“In general, it must be said that the company of the “chicks of Petrov’s nest” has crept up not only that it is fetid and bad, but also extremely unviable: both short-lived and left no offspring. As soon as Peter died, the members of this circle quarreled, betrayed each other and began to die one by one. And in their descendants these people were barren. If the reader considers that I am a spiteful critic and slandering beautiful people, let him name any of the Menshikovs, Yaguzhinskys, Golovins, Buturlins. Name at least one well-known statesman, famous for his deeds, scientist, writer, artist…”, noted A. Burovsky.

studying historical facts and events that were carefully hushed up and kept secret, it can be unequivocally said that Peter I on the throne was replaced by an impostor.

The substitution of the real Peter I and his capture took place during his trip to Amsterdam along with the Great Embassy. I tried, by copying, to put together in this post various sources confirming this tragic fact in the history of Russia.

The embassy is leaving a young man of twenty-six years of age, above average height, solid build, physically healthy, with a mole on his left cheek, with wavy hair, well-educated, loving everything Russian, Orthodox (it would be more correct - orthodox) Christian, who knows the Bible by heart and etc. etc.

Two years later, a man returns who practically does not speak Russian, who hates everything Russian, who until the end of his life never learned to write in Russian, having forgotten everything he could before leaving for the Grand Embassy and miraculously acquired new skills and abilities, without a mole on on the left cheek, with straight hair, a sickly, forty-year-old looking man.

Isn't it true, some unexpected changes happened to the young man during his two years of absence.

Curiously, the papers of the Great Embassy do not mention that Mikhailov (under this surname young Peter went with the embassy) fell ill with a fever, but it was no secret for the embassy who, in fact, “Mikhailov” was.

A man returns from a trip with a chronic fever, with traces of long-term use of mercury preparations, which were then used to treat tropical fever.

For reference, it should be noted that the Grand Embassy went by the northern sea route, while tropical fever can be “earned” in southern waters, and even then, only after visiting the jungle.

In addition, after returning from the Great Embassy, ​​Peter I, during naval battles, demonstrated extensive experience in boarding combat, which has specific features that can only be mastered by experience. Which requires personal participation in many boarding battles.

All this together suggests that the person who returned with the Great Embassy was an experienced sailor who participated in many naval battles and sailed a lot in the southern seas.

Before the trip, Peter I did not take part in naval battles, if only because during his childhood and youth, Muscovy or Moscow Tartaria did not have access to the seas, with the exception of the White Sea, which simply cannot be called tropical. Yes, and on this Peter I was not often, and even then, as an honorary passenger.

During his visit to the Solovetsky Monastery, the boat on which he was miraculously saved during a storm, and he personally makes a memorial cross for the Archangel Cathedral, on the occasion of salvation in a storm.

And if we add to this the fact that he often corresponded with his beloved wife (Tsarina Evdokia), whom he missed, when he was away, upon his return from the Great Embassy, ​​without even seeing her, without explaining the reasons, he sends him to a convent .

The Russian embassy that accompanied the tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted of only the Dutch (including the notorious Lefort), only Menshikov remained the only one from the old composition.

This "embassy" brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed a substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise archers against the impostor. As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gates of the Kremlin, the impostor exiled the wife of Peter I to a monastery, where she never reached, and called his own from Holland.

“His” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty False Peter immediately killed, although the official story tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed the youngest son Alexei as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

=======================

Peter the impostor did such transformations with Russia that we are still echoing around. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

He defeated the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with the bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously planted it here;

He transferred the peasants to the property of the nobles, which turned them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this “event” falls on Ivan IV);

He defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

He defeated the clergy - the carriers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

Introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

He destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

He ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. He called on the German "professors"; write a completely different Russian history;

Under the guise of a struggle with the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who lived for more than three hundred years;

He forbade the cultivation of amaranth and the use of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, which destroyed the longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;

He abolished natural measures: a fathom, a finger, an elbow, an inch, which were present in clothes, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

He replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate. Although the "peasant" is a title, higher than the king, about which there is more than one evidence;

Destroyed the Russian script, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the Cyril and Methodius script;

He disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers as a caste with their miraculous abilities and magical weapons, and introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons in a European manner, dressing the army first in French and then in German uniforms, although the Russian military uniform was itself a weapon. Among the people, the new regiments were called "amusing".

But his main crime was the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create three people subtle bodies that he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions from a person they made a generalist who could, starting from bast shoes and ending with a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the Pretender, people in Russia did not know what wine was, he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and the townspeople to drink for free. This was done to rip off the memory past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of babies who were born, remembering their past lives and able to speak, continued. Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of infants with past life memories cast a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves did not dare to call Peter the Great for a long time. And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, did a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, allegedly brought there from America. Solanaceae (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe even before Peter. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by a large species diversity, which took more than one thousand years. On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word "witchcraft" is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of root nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits *, corresponding to 108 - Russian gods.

After Peter, there were units of sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe, this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of a person. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was allowed to cultivate potatoes (Orthodox Old Believers do not use them for food), sweet potato and earthen pear, which today are poorly eaten. Destruction of sacred plants used in certain time, led to the loss of complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its time”). Moreover, the mixing of food caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people exude stench instead of fragrance. Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain: the “root of life”, lemongrass, zamaniha, golden root. They contributed to the adaptation of a person to difficult conditions and kept a person young and healthy. There are absolutely no plants-metamorphizers left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance, for 20 years it was found in the mountains of Tibet "The Sacred Coil", and even that has disappeared today.

* Today, the word “fruit” is understood as a unifying concept, which includes fruits, nuts, berries, which used to be called simply gifts, while gifts of herbs and shrubs were called fruits. An example of fruits are peas, beans (pods), peppers, i.e. peculiar unsweetened fruits of herbs.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at present, Kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, it is forbidden to grow poppies. From many sacred gifts, only the names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: pruhva, kaliva, bukhma, landushka, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigwa, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya in the 19th century denoted a pear, although these were completely different gifts, today these words are used to call the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb, used to denote the mudra of the heart, today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, figs and figs were no longer grown, because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians. Already recently, proska has been called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals have disappeared forever from the humankind of agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I? He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to convey the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity. Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic fraternity of Europe, called to fight, together with the Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decide to go over to the side of Charles), won at Poltava. The real Russian Tsar Peter I was again captured and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was put on his face, which caused a lot of talk in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem, kill the real Peter, and there would be no trouble. But the fact of the matter is, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war would have succeeded, which in fact were civil wars, which led to the formation of two new states: Turkey and Sweden, and then several more. But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and talked about the fact that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor. And against this background, the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlozer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, no longer presented any particular difficulty in declaring all the Dmitriev tsars False Dmitrys and impostors who did not have the right to the throne, and who did not managed to groan, they changed the royal surname to - Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which is the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (autocracy).

First judicial branch was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people who do not have a spiritual dignity, i.e. the power of the best has been replaced by the power of anyone

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on the negative emotions, which, as you know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on a whip, but also on a carrot, but a person on our planet is rated lower than animals by conquerors.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitive laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which strikes a balance between encouragement and prohibition. Let us recall how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: "They had all the laws in their heads." Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of horse, from which the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to horse) have come down to us. Guided by the principles of the horse, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. The principle is always above the law, because it contains more possibilities than the law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word. The very word "law" means "beyond the horse." If a society lives according to the principles of the horse, and not according to the laws, it is more vital. Commandments contain more than a horse, and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of the horse.

As the remarkable Russian thinker I.L. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the charms of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, based on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other in 20-30 years. However, let us give him the floor himself: “Professor Whipper is not quite right when he writes that modern humanitarian sciences- this is only "theological scholasticism and nothing more"; it is something much worse: it is deceit. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals, beckoning us to the mass graves of famine and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external destruction.

The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’Alembert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940. The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also ended its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the whole cycle: there is hunger, there is terror, there were wars, both internal and external, but the defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, one more payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for swamp lights lit by our masters of thoughts over the most rotten places of a real historical swamp.

Not always the philosophers listed by Solonevich themselves came up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often prompted to them.

V.A. Shemshuk "Return of Paradise to Earth"
======================

“With other European peoples, you can achieve the goal in philanthropic ways, but not so with the Russians ... I am not dealing with people, but with animals that I want to turn into people” - such a documented phrase of Peter 1 very clearly conveys his attitude towards the Russian people.

It is hard to believe that these same "animals", in gratitude for this, called him the Great.
Russophobes will immediately try to explain everything by the fact that yes, he made people out of animals, and only because of this Russia became Great and the “animals” that became people thankfully called him the Great.
Or maybe this is the gratitude of the owners of the Romanovs for the perfectly fulfilled obligations to destroy precisely the traces of the greatness of the Russian People, which haunted those who wanted to create for themselves Great History, the ruling circles of states, until recently the former provincial outlying provinces?
And it was this very Greatness of the Russian People that did not allow them to create it?

========================================

One can talk a lot and interestingly about Peter I. For example, today it is already known that his short but intensive rule actually cost the Russian people more than 20 million lives (read the article by N.V. Levashov "") about this. Maybe that's why the man who is called today Peter I is now declared "great"?

Anyone interested in this topic can also watch the video:

In March 1697, Peter 1 went on a one and a half year trip abroad to study various sciences and wrote tender letters from there to his beloved wife and missed everything Russian. But he returned from there a completely different person!

He even lost a relative upon his return to Russia!

He suddenly calls the Russian population animals, and, without even seeing his family, orders to imprison his wife and sisters in a monastery, and in fact in prison.

It destroys its own Moscow archery army, in which, by the way, persistent rumors were already crawling that the tsar had been replaced ...

Even before Peter's arrival, his mentors and friends die under mysterious circumstances.

Then Peter will order to kill his son Alexei! For what? So that no one exposes the substitution?

Fragment from the book: "Return of Paradise to Earth" Part II, § 11. Satanic coup in Russia, series "In Search of the Secret", V.A. Shemshuk:

Most effective method management of us - the substitution of the head.

I never thought that I would have to write on this topic, so I did not specifically try to remember all the sources of information that I came across as a collector of rare books. Passion for rare books, as my practice has shown, is far from a safe occupation, my library was robbed four times. After the fourth time, I no longer kept books with me, but tried to better remember what I managed to read.

Meeting with people of the old Orthodox faith, from whom it was possible to learn something, penetrating into special stores under various pretexts, I received more and more evidence of a satanic coup committed in Russia. Let me state the essence here without special references to sources, because naming books means signing their death sentence.

In his work “Antichrist”, he noted a complete change in the appearance, character and psyche of Tsar Peter I after his return from the “German lands”, where he went for two weeks, and returned two years later. The Russian embassy that accompanied the tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov. After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted of only the Dutch (including the notorious Lefort), only Menshikov remained the only one from the old composition.

This "embassy" brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed a substitution: This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise archers against the impostor.

As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed, Sophia was hanged on the Spassky Gates of the Kremlin, the impostor exiled the wife of Peter 1 to a monastery, where she never reached, and called his own from Holland.
“His” brother Ivan V and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty False Peter immediately killed, although the official story tells us about this in a completely different way. And he executed the youngest son Alexei as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.

Peter the impostor did such transformations with Russia that we are still echoing around. He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:

defeated the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with the bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously planted it here;

transferred the peasants to the property of the nobles, which turned them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this “event” falls on Ivan IV);

defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;

defeated the clergy - the carriers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;

introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;

destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;

ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned. He called on the German "professors"; write a completely different Russian history;

under the guise of a struggle with the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who lived for more than three hundred years;

he forbade the cultivation of amaranth and the use of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people, thereby destroying longevity on Earth, which still remained in Russia at that time;

abolished natural measures: a sazhen, a finger, an elbow, an inch, which were present in clothes, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life. As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;

replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate. Although the "peasant" is a title, higher than the king, about which there is more than one evidence;

destroyed the Russian script, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of Cyril and Methodius;

disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers as a caste with their miraculous abilities and magical weapons, and introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons in a European manner, dressing the army first in French and then in German uniforms, although the Russian military uniform was the weapon itself. Among the people, the new regiments were called "amusing".

But his main crime is the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture), the essence of which was to create three subtle bodies in a person, which he does not receive from birth, and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives. If in Russian educational institutions a generalist was made from a person who could, starting from bast shoes and ending with a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.

Before Peter the Pretender, people in Russia did not know what wine was, he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and the townspeople to drink for free. This was done to ward off the memory of a past life. During the period of Peter, the persecution of babies who were born, remembering their past lives and able to speak, continued.

Their persecution began with John IV. The mass destruction of infants with past life memories cast a curse on all incarnations of such children. It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours (but there are still rare exceptions).

After all these deeds, the invaders themselves did not dare to call Peter the Great for a long time.

And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, did a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, allegedly brought there from America. Solanaceae (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe even before Peter. Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by a large species diversity, which took more than one thousand years.

On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word "witchcraft" is used in a sharply negative sense). Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of root nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits, corresponding to 108 - Russian gods.

After Peter, there were units of sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself. In Europe, this was done even earlier. Cereals, fruits and root nodules were especially destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of a person.

The only thing that Peter the Pretender did was allow the cultivation of potatoes (potatoes, like tobacco (!) Belong to the nightshade family. Tops, eyes and green potatoes are poisonous. Green potatoes contain very strong poisons, solanines, which are especially dangerous for the health of children.), sweet potato and earthen pear, which are poorly eaten today.

The destruction of sacred plants consumed at a certain time led to the loss of complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its own time”).

Moreover, the mixing of food caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people exude stench instead of fragrance. Plants - adoptogens - almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remained: the "root of life", lemongrass, zamaniha, golden root. They contributed to the adaptation of a person to difficult conditions and kept a person young and healthy. There are absolutely no plants-metamorphizers left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance, for 20 years it was found in the mountains of Tibet "The Sacred Coil", and even that has disappeared today.

The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at present, Kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, it is forbidden to grow poppies.

From many sacred gifts, only the names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits. For example: pruhva, kaliva, bukhma, landushka, which are passed off as rutabaga, or armud, kvit, pigwa, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince. Kukish and dulya in the 19th century denoted a pear, although these were completely different gifts, today these words are used to call the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift). A fist with an inserted thumb, used to denote the mudra of the heart, today it is used as a negative sign. Dulya, figs and figs were no longer grown, because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians.

Already recently, proska has been called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals have disappeared forever from the humankind of agriculture.

What happened to the real Peter I?

He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to convey the letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden, and he rescued him from captivity.

Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic fraternity of Europe, called to fight, together with the Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decide to go over to the side of Charles), won at Poltava.

The real Russian Tsar Peter I was again captured and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died. An iron mask was put on his face, which caused a lot of talk in France and Europe. The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.

It would seem, kill the real Peter, and there would be no trouble. But the fact of the matter is, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war would have succeeded, which in fact were civil wars that led to the formation of two new states : Turkey and Sweden, and then a few more.

But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states. In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and talked about the fact that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor.

And against this background, the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlozer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, no longer presented any particular difficulty in declaring all the Dmitriev tsars False Dmitrys and impostors who did not have the right to the throne, and who did not managed to groan, they changed the royal surname to - Rurik.

The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which is the basis of the constitutions of modern states. It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (self-government + autocracy).

For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people who did not have a spiritual dignity, i.e. the power of the best was replaced by the power of anyone.

Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility. State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as you know, can only destroy. This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to opposition of officials to the people. Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on a stick, but also on a carrot, but a person on our planet is rated lower than animals by conquerors.

Let us recall how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: "They had all the laws in their heads." Relations in ancient society were regulated by the principles of horse, from which the words “canon” (ancient - konon), “from time immemorial”, “chambers” (i.e. according to horse) have come down to us.

Guided by the principles of the horse, a person avoided mistakes and could incarnate again in this life. The principle is always above the law, because it contains more possibilities than the law, just as a sentence contains more information than one word.

The very word "law" means "beyond the horse." If a society lives according to the principles of the horse, and not according to the laws, it is more vital. Commandments contain more than a horse, and therefore surpass it, just as a story contains more than a sentence. The commandments can improve human organization and thinking, which in turn can improve the principles of the horse.

In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was not built on prohibitive laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which strikes a balance between encouragement and prohibition.

As the remarkable Russian thinker I.L. Solonevich, who knew from his own experience the charms of Western democracy, in addition to the long-lived Russian monarchy, based on popular representation (zemstvo), merchants and clergy (meaning pre-Petrine times), democracy and dictatorship were invented, replacing each other in 20-30 years.

However, let us give him the floor himself: “Professor Whipper is not entirely right when he writes that the modern humanities are only “theological scholasticism and nothing more”; it is something much worse: it is deceit. This is a whole collection of deceptive travel signals, beckoning us to the mass graves of famine and executions, typhus and wars, internal ruin and external destruction. The “science” of Diderot, Rousseau, D’Alembert and others has already completed its cycle: there was famine, there was terror, there were wars, and there was the external defeat of France in 1814, in 1871, in 1940.

The science of Hegel, Mommsen, Nietzsche and Rosenberg also ended its cycle: there was terror, there were wars, there was famine and there was defeat in 1918 and 1945. The science of the Chernyshevskys, Lavrovs, Mikhailovskys, Milyukovs and Lenins has not yet gone through the whole cycle: there is hunger, there is terror, there were wars, both internal and external, but the defeat will still come: inevitable and inevitable, one more payment for the verbiage of two hundred years, for swamp lights lit by our masters of thoughts over the most rotten places of a real historical swamp.

Not always the philosophers listed by Solonevich themselves came up with ideas that could destroy society: they were often prompted to them ...