Guu in the ranking of universities. Guu reviews. Interfax National Ranking of Universities: SUM is among the leaders in the development of further vocational education
To use our website, you must enable JavaScript in your browser.
The best faculties and universities in Moscow
according to the site version 2018–2019
Rating of faculties of Moscow universities in eight professional areas according to the site version 2018–2019
The rating of the site does not take into account scientific degrees and research work in universities. As a basis, we took the demand for graduates in the labor market - what worries applicants in the first place. On the top lines of the list are the faculties that train the most successful specialists. These graduates receive more interviews, are offered higher salaries, and are more likely to look for jobs in their specialty than their competitors.
How did we count?
Analysts of the site analyzed the resume database of graduates of Moscow universities in 2017-2018. The rating included 8 professional areas for which the most complete data was available: each contains at least 1,100 resumes with a correctly indicated educational institution and published at least 20,000 vacancies in Moscow, which indicates the demand for these specializations in the labor market.
- Information Technology;
- jurisprudence;
- economics and finance;
- personnel Management;
- Marketing communications;
- the medicine;
- journalism;
- tourism and hospitality.
More about the methodology - in the last part of the study.
So, we are announcing the list of winners, who release the most demanded specialists on the labor market!
Ratings of faculties of Moscow universities for areas:
Jurisprudence
Economics and finance
Personnel Management
Marketing communications
The medicine
Tourism and hospitality
Journalism
Can't find a university or faculty?
This is an objective rating based on the realities of the labor market, and there are limitations in its methodology. The absence of a university or faculty in the list is due to the low activity of its graduates or incomplete information in their resumes. In connection with the reform of the education system, a number of universities were reorganized and merged with leading universities. A number of faculties were also abolished or reorganized in accordance with market requirements.
Faculty ranking methodology website 2018–2019
Unique features of the site rating that distinguish it from other ratings:
- used data on the demand for graduates of 2017-2018 from faculties / departments of Moscow universities who posted their resumes;
- the real demand for graduates was assessed by analyzing the actions of applicants / graduates (profile of placement) and employers (invitations for interviews, the salary to which graduates are invited, and comparison with the general market salary);
- weights for ranking are based on an online survey conducted in May 2016 among 159 employers/HR managers hiring in this moment young professionals.
Parameters used when calculating the site rating:
Region of the analyzed university: Moscow.
- p i - invitations to an interview for graduates of a particular faculty who have posted resumes only in the profile area.
- p f - the total number of invitations for an interview of all graduates of a particular faculty.
- s m is the average salary to which graduates of a particular faculty are invited.
- s bdzp - the average salary for beginners in the field according to .
- r i - the number of resumes of graduates of the desired faculty, posted in the profile area, as well as in the profile specialization in the professional area "Start of a career, students" *.
- r f - the total number of resumes of graduates of the desired faculty.
- w j - weight for each rating criterion, determined by the degree of importance for the employer when hiring young professionals based on an online survey.
* For example, the profile of posting resumes for lawyers is the number of resumes of graduates of law faculties posted in the professional areas "Lawyers" and "Start of a career, students" (specialization "Lawyers").
Three criteria used in ranking a site:
- Demand for graduates of a particular faculty: the ratio of invitations to interviews of graduates who posted resumes in the profile field to invitations to graduates of this faculty as a whole - ( p i p f).
- Salary demand for graduates from employers: an indicator of the ratio of the average salary to which young specialists are invited to the average salary according to - ( s m s bdzp).
- Profile job search by graduates or “correspondence of the labor market and the education system”: the share of resumes of graduates of a particular faculty posted in the profile area among all graduates of a particular faculty - ( r i r f).
X = w 1 × p i p f+ w 2 × r i r f+ w 3 × s m s bdzp
Scale description:
- Salary demand for graduates on the part of employers was rated by employers as the highest (w 3 ). This criterion, in terms of importance in the recruitment of young graduates, has received GPA, equal to 3.64 out of 5 possible.
- The profile job search by graduates or “correspondence of the labor market and the education system” (w 2 ) as a criterion for hiring young graduates received a score of 3.18 points out of 5 possible.
- Applicant activity of the candidate (w 1 ) as a criterion for hiring young graduates received a score of 2.86 points out of 5 possible.
Restrictions, or why some universities or faculties are not in the ranking:
- The purpose of the rating is to assess the demand for graduates by employers by measuring their mutual activity in the labor market. We deliberately did not conduct surveys of graduates and did not measure the criteria that affect the assessment of the quality of the education system of a particular faculty, for example: publications in journals, teaching staff, the number of graduates of candidates and doctors of science, etc.
- Time period analyzed: Applicants from Moscow universities in 2017-2018 release.
- The object of analysis is the resumes of graduates posted only.
- The minimum number of resumes of graduates of a particular faculty of the university who posted their resumes on the site is 30 pieces.
The research center site presents to your attention a new project - the SuperJob University Ranking.
The purpose of the rating is to assess the picture of the real employment of graduates of Russian universities.
The source of information for building the rating is the largest database of resumes in Russia, a website with more than a million resumes of Russian specialists. The information base of the portal contains information about graduates of most higher educational institutions Russia of almost all professions that exist at the present stage of development of the labor market. Two-thirds of the entire base are resumes of specialists with completed higher education.
The structure of the composite rating is a set of independent ratings for individual segments that characterize the picture of employment and the quality of education of graduates of higher educational institutions today, namely:
- employment rating by specialty;
- rating of average salaries of university graduates working in their specialty;
- rating of average salaries of university graduates working outside their specialty;
- index of salary variation of university graduates when changing their specialty.
Rating | Employment in the specialty | Average salary of workers in the specialty (M c) | Average salary of non-professional workers (M n) | Wage variation index (IVM) |
||||
A | over 60% | over 50,000 rubles. | over 50,000 rubles. | the ratio of the average salary of workers not in their specialty to the average salary of workers in their specialty
|
||||
B | 45-60% | 40,000 - 50,000 rubles | 40,000 - 50,000 rubles | |||||
C | 30-45% | 30,000 - 40,000 rubles | 30,000 - 40,000 rubles | |||||
D | 15-30% | 20,000 - 30,000 rubles | 20,000 - 30,000 rubles | |||||
E | less than 15% | less than 20,000 rubles. | less than 20,000 rubles. |
Attention! The place of the university in the table has nothing to do with the place of the university in the ranking! There is no first place, no second place, no third place in the ranking.
SuperJob.ru research center presents to your attention a new project - the SuperJob University Ranking.
Moscow city
22:27 20.05.2019
Negative impression
The other day I had the "pleasure" of listening to the motivational speech of the rector of the State University of Management Lobanov in front of the team. I still can't shake the feeling of disgust. In short - "employees must create scientific schools, obtain grants, conduct world-class scientific research, establish interuniversity relations, and ensure the highest quality of education." And all this was said to a team of 60+ year-old employees, where for a full-time assistant professor the salary is 30 thousand per month (in Moscow!), And for half-time - 15 thousand))))))). And only pensioners sit there, who simply have nowhere to go. Well, no one even asked anything anymore, everyone understood everything about these "bosses" for a long time. In general, I experienced the same disgust only from Putin's New Year's speech about "mercy", after raising taxes, retirement age and exempting oligarchs from taxes. Probably, throughout the country, bossy degenerates like Lobanov take an example from the main hypocrite?
This "genius of management" also spoke about how he "is ready for the development of the university." Any grants, equipment and everything. For the sake of interest, I asked the employees how much they received assistance with their production requests - they answered that all their requests were ignored, they did not give funding for anything.
During the time he was sitting on feeding (in office), Lobanov repaired the premises of the administration - it became prettier there, for his beloved. But the student toilets, as they were homeless, have remained.
In general, parents of applicants, this information is for you. If the budget - still all right, for the sake of some formal piece of paper. But paying - it makes no sense at all. You can't get any education at SUM.
Moscow city
11:17 05.01.2017
Positive impression
I entered the GUU in 2014, the first opinion, to be honest, was not the best, because I got to the university through local small shops and arches where ordinary people who do not study at guu pass. Upon admission, everything was very organized both when submitting documents and from the beginning of study. There are many good teachers in guu. The quality of education, of course, is one level lower than in the more prestigious universities of Moscow, but this will not hurt a student who wants to study!
Moscow city
11:55 15.12.2016
Negative impression
He graduated this year with a bachelor's degree from the State University of Management. I got a lot of bad impressions.
The disgusting organization of everything that can only be badly organized. Just the inability to reach out to the program leaders, one of whom is your thesis supervisor, is worth something.
The disregard of teachers: I vividly remember one sweetest lady who was constantly late for lectures on management, skipped them, canceled classes, let everyone go early, gave assignments and tests downloaded from the Internet. A lot of freebies. A lot of "overdue" data. There is a lot of corruption, like teachers who directly said that it was impossible to pass without buying their books, but fortunately it is not rampant, they are trying to fight it, and as a result, you can pass it without it.
The disregard attitude is also in the majority of students. Nobody wants, knows or wants to know. And this is quite enough to graduate from the university.
Curators changed one after another, but none of them knew anything.
The organization of foreign internships is disgusting, even though it is not easy to participate. Again, no one knows anything, no one is responsible for anything, there is no correspondence between programs.
I'll dilute this barrel of tar with a spoon of honey. Often there were teachers who knew how to interest in their subject and knew a lot about it, for example, Beregovskaya Tatyana Aleksandrovna. It was only thanks to such teachers that I did not drop out from the very first course.
I finished and am very glad that I will not return here again. I will apply for a master's degree at another university.
Moscow city
15:50 23.09.2016
Positive impression
My son entered the State University this year. I will not write about the successful organization of the host company again. I would like to write a few words about my son's first days at SUM. The first thing that struck me was that a meeting was organized for the first-year students even before the start of the educational process. It was not a boring meeting or "subbotnik", but a meeting in the fresh air with contests and quizzes, well organized by the curators, where the children could get to know each other. I quote my son's review: "This is cooler than graduation at school!" Further, from the first days of September, the curators met the children and accompanied them everywhere around the SUM "by the hand", until the first-year students themselves began to navigate the process and the building of the university. I see how my son rushes to the State University of Management every morning with pleasure and compare it with how I used to have to push him to school. I am glad that my son made the right choice by entering SUM.
Moscow city
12:48 18.08.2016
Positive impression
Good afternoon. My daughter is not yet studying at the State University of Management, but has just entered. I can say right away that the first impression of the Admissions Committee is extremely important for me. Here everything was organized at the highest level. I myself am a top manager of a large holding and I can evaluate any action from the point of view of a competent organization :)
A crowd of excited applicants with crazy moms (like me) and dads, especially those who didn’t write the exam very well - this is a very difficult audience! There are always a lot of the same questions and errors when filling out documents. At SUM, I liked that people were let into the lobby in parts, where a very polite senior student told in detail about how to fill out applications, what to pay special attention to and whose applications would be accepted. Further, this "bunch" passed into the next hall, where there were a lot of tables, and samples of filling were hung. Further, with the completed papers, you go to the tables with the inspectors, who will tell you what to correct (if any inaccuracies were made). and only then you go to the hall, where you are entered into the database by the students operators under the strict control of responsible teachers.
I don't know, maybe for someone it's too much, but for me it's a big plus! No fuss, no extra worries - everything is clear and efficient!
We came to the university twice, the second time to write a statement of consent and sign a contract (my daughter is one of those who did not write the exam very well). The main thing is that ALL the staff of the State University of Management (from students in the PC, to teachers and deans' staff) were always very polite, explained everything in great detail and calmly.
My husband and I recommended this university to our daughter due to the fact that a very respected specialist in the field of Marketing sent us to SUM. Yes, the language base is weak. But we go to SUM precisely for marketing knowledge. And I really want to believe that my daughter will not be disappointed in the learning process! And she will learn the language in parallel at the language school.
Also, I'm not a hired person. Not an employee of the university))) I'm a real person :)
In addition, I can personally say that a good half of my very successful friends are GUU graduates. :)
All the best studies - there would be a desire!
Moscow city
01:03 02.03.2016
Positive impression
Good university! Excellent teachers! They give good knowledge, you just learn! Yes, every university has flaws! There is corruption in the GUU. But since 2013, they have been struggling with it. There is a change of leaders and quite successfully! There is an opportunity to go abroad on an exchange (nothing complicated - you pass the exam and that's it). There is also a business center where they give real knowledge! I am for GUU.
Moscow city
14:18 30.01.2016
Negative impression
Nobody is responsible for anything! For all 6 years, they have not provided a single practice! Money tear up is not small, but zero sense! Talentless teachers who cannot even explain their core subject! Deans change like gloves! The buildings are in ruins! One projector for the whole building, no normal canteen, no cash desk. Machines with coffee do not work "UK" Semenovsky! The curator of the group was disgusting! Everyone doesn't care! 6 months could not explain the standards of writing a diploma! A mess in the schedule, no one can adjust it forever, teachers quit before the session! At tests and exams, others are already accepting! Universities like this need to be shut down!
Moscow city
16:45 19.01.2016
Negative impression
Second course, evening, world economy. Knowledge here is exactly zero. The lecturer on the world economy lectured from Wikipedia. Grandmother, a mathematician, fell asleep at seminars. Since the second year, the so-called CAE (optional subject) began, for which the teachers simply did not come. Even if you want to learn, you can't. Most of the lectures are a repetition of the textbook word for word. You ask about an incomprehensible moment - in response only: "Well, look for yourself in the textbook." Or just ignores. There is no language here. Not according to the curriculum, not as extra. courses. Rather, there are courses, but they are taught by senior students who speak very poorly themselves.
Everything is done for money and for the sake of money. If you are a payer, you can take a session at least until the next one. State employees are forced to go to pay or deduct. But to open a new cafe at the university and sell pasta and rolls there.
The rector is always happy.
By the way, there were also three rectors in 3 years. There is something to think about.
All positive reviews are written by the university itself. Do not enter here under any circumstances.
Moscow city
19:49 15.01.2016
Positive impression
There are a lot of reviews about the State University on the Internet, I will add my own) I love my university. Yes, there are overlays here, some teachers are annoying, but where is it different? Here they give real knowledge, and not just extracts from books of the third grade. Do you want to study? You will be given maximum knowledge, and if not, your problems. Getting the specialty of a manager on the Ros-Brit program, I am very pleased with the choice, I will immediately make a reservation: no one forces you to go to England by force) Moreover, the university has absolutely real opportunities to go to study abroad for six months free of charge, on a competitive basis. There are many subjects, some are interesting, some are frankly boring. But, nevertheless, when you start working, they turn out to be almost the most important. Student life deserves special attention, there is something to do even for the most picky)
Summing up: no one will pull by the ears, it is clearly stipulated here that the people who surround you are your competitors, your future and what place you will take in life depends only on you. And if you are ready to learn, knowledge will give more than enough.
Moscow city
15:29 27.10.2015
Negative impression
I am finishing the first module at the HSE Master's program in Moscow, but I got my bachelor's degree at the State University of Management, so there is something to compare and say.
My review is more neutral than negative.
I will make a reservation right away - I graduated from economics and will tell you how it was in my group.
In my opinion, the main problem of guu is the unwillingness to develop in most teachers, but, apparently, this is strongly influenced by their age and their salary.
At SUM there is no red button for teachers like in the tower, although this would not hurt many, because, for example, my management was led by the head of one of the departments of my institute, but there were at most 5 lectures for the entire semester, and even fewer seminars. Reason: Classes were on Friday from 5 to half 7, she was constantly interfered with by her personal affairs (I need to take my daughter to the doctor, I need to go to the cinema with her, meet friends). These are the reasons she herself voiced. Also, the seminarian in sociology actively imposed his opinion on political and religious rules, the teacher in finance was from the same series as the sociologist. The lady who kept my accounting was about 85, and she had a very negative attitude towards the male half of the group. The young teacher, who taught several subjects in his specialty and econometrics, actively threw a show off about how wonderful and promising he was, and that he would not stay in teaching for a long time. While still teaching :) Although in his disgusting manner.
1-2 courses were filled with a lot of strange subjects, such as political economy. But there were a lot of mathematical disciplines (a big plus, I think. Although the program is at the level of the 11th grade of a regular school)
Years 3-4 are already more interesting, but the lack of English immediately after the 1st year was annoying, but we continued to go to physical education until the end of the penultimate semester. :)
Separately, a few words about English: if you want to learn a language from scratch, then it is better to choose courses in special language schools. In most directions foreign is disgusting. We read texts, learned vocabulary and retelling, we did this for the entire 1st year. In the group with English, only 3 people were good.
By the way, it was easy to do.
Nevertheless, I want to say thank you to the State University of Management, because for the time being I am worthy of leaving on the knowledge that I received in 4 years of undergraduate studies, but with pleasure I ran away to a better university. :)
Moscow city
18:11 04.09.2015
Positive impression
Hello forum members! I plan to enter the GUU master's program next year in the direction of Management. Is there anyone out there already doing this kind of training? Is it possible to get all the knowledge that is mentioned on the university website?
I would be glad to hear all your opinions - Pros and Cons.! Thank you in advance.
Moscow city
00:43 16.08.2015
Negative impression
GUU is my pain and deep disappointment.
I entered the magistracy of the National Research University Higher School of Economics and I am happy. The following will be arguments on 11 points that especially upset me.
1) There is a big problem with languages at SUM. Moreover, the scientific and lecture base in the humanities is significantly outdated. Modern knowledge, methods and approaches can be gleaned from current scientific articles in Western journals. But, unfortunately, most of the SUM teachers do not speak English at a sufficient level, and the university itself does not provide access to the most relevant scientific database ("expensive" and "no money").
HSE has a different approach. Most of the courses are taught in English, as various courses are often attended by exchange students. The professor's English is not bad. For the most part, everyone studied or received a PhD abroad, participate in international conferences in other countries of the world, and are published in English.
There are strict requirements for the teaching staff compared to the SUM. In the tower every year there are re-elections for the position. Moreover, any teacher must publish at least 1 scientific article in a (foreign) journal.
At SUM you will meet a lot of non-professionals. During my time, in 2008, several luminaries in statistics and mathematics left, complaining about the low criteria for selecting students and general stupidity (people could not calculate the proportion in the 2nd year, and the assistant professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences killed 40 minutes explaining this to glamorous "blonds").
2) Moreover, HSE has many visiting lecturers from South Korea, Great Britain, New Zealand, and Italy. There are also Turks with a Berkeley diploma :) At SUM, you are unlikely to find at least one teacher with a PhD from a normal university, say, at least the top 20 in the world ranking.
3) There are many international students at HSE. Yes, yes, not from Zimbabwe or Vietnam, as in the SUM, but from normal European countries (Italy, France, Holland, Great Britain). The guys come on an exchange for a semester or two. There are smart people who enter the full-fledged program. But there are still few of them (Finns, Latvians, Chinese).
4) The modular system of education, in comparison with the SUM, is implemented in a radically different way. In the SUM, all disciplines are imposed and the DPA (the disciplines of your choice have already been chosen for you and often this is some kind of nonsense).
In the tower within the module, 60% of compulsory disciplines, and 40% you choose yourself. And no one will forbid you to be like the courses of the "coolest" programs - joint with the London School of Economics (see the world rankings for yourself).
5) A chic library, as you have to read a lot and all the textbooks are in English. Expensive books on econometrics for 6-8000 tr. they can easily give you a hand (of course, they are not endless, but there are definitely 17-20 copies in stock). I remember looking in horror at the prices on the Internet for these books and was afraid that there would not be a specific textbook in the library. The books were in rows.
What's more, subscriptions to the online libraries of Oxford, Harvard Business School and the most famous magazines are also available. This is all useful in your studies to develop your models and hypotheses.
6) There are no endless 2-3 retakes in HSE, as in SUM. Did not pass the exam - you immediately get on the commission for expulsion. Therefore, lazy people do not stay here for a long time. You will be surrounded by interesting and smart guys. I was lucky with the group, and even having gone to different countries, having found a job in Europe in our specialty, we keep in touch.
7) All exams are written. An appeal is possible after grading. And you are respected as a young colleague, and not as one who took it into his head to challenge the point of view of the great and terrible, hardened in the scoop and insanity professor from the State University of Management without any merit (neither domestic, nor even world). At HSE, during the appeal, I managed to challenge two questions with the winner of the award, Adam Smith, and still get 6.
8) Oh yes! The rating system is 10 or 100 points, which gives a more objective picture. Five to five strife.
9) Minimum bureaucracy: you will find out grades and other important news in your personal account. Order documents online.
In GUU, you need to run with your legs. The dean's inspectors still manually collect all the exam records and take them to the CC (computer center), where the aunts enter the grades of all students into an antediluvian system. This is only needed for scholarships, as students also have transcripts. In short, endless duplication of pieces of paper by pieces of paper.
10) EACH auditorium has a ceiling projector and screen (or 2 - depending on the size of the room) and a monoblock. For very young children, you can take the equipment without any problems in a special room. There are always markers.
At HSE, all lectures are in presentation format, which are duplicated to students by email. In SUM, this approach is not possible: there are no equipment or classrooms with equipment. The teachers mumble on a piece of paper or a book (most of it), or they ask you to buy your manual.
I remember this shame - you can't get a projector at the SUM or you need to look for a special audience that does not work on Saturday. The students ended up wasting a lot of paper.
Vissarionov Alexander Borisovich
Moscow city
15:25 03.04.2015
Positive impression
He graduated in 1980. The knowledge gained at SUM is still enough for scientific and practical work. Until today (2015) I have been successfully cooperating with the university. I work in the specialty I received to this day in the system of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, doctor, professor. Relations at the university are very benevolent and democratic. A large number of my classmates have achieved significant success in science, business, and public administration. The education provided by the SUM can be called fundamental and comprehensive both in the field of theory and in the field of management practice and management.
Anastasia
Moscow city
10:42 27.03.2015
Positive impression
Moscow city
12:34 19.03.2015
Negative impression
A shame! The country's main university, which graduates "managers" and managers within itself, cannot get the job done. Everything is terrible with regard to the organization of studies, none of the organizational staff wants to work, I have been studying for the 6th semester, and only once in all the time I found out my schedule before the start of the semester, before that they always gave the schedule after a week or even two! after the start of classes. And the pairs were thrown at random (in the dean's office they simply mixed pairs with free teachers). From this semester, "DAYS of self-study" was introduced, and so our dean's office did not bother to coordinate the schedule with the departments so that it was planned to give us DAYS (exactly DAYS, not hours) of self-study. As a result, ALWAYS, without exception, it turns out that you have to come to one class at five in the evening, or come to the first and third classes, and there is a window of TWO HOURS between them. And for some, the way to the GUU (only one way) takes 2 hours, and all this to sit 1 couple. And this is all the university, which, at every opportunity, declares that it is preparing the future of the country, that the best managers are graduating here, that everything is at the highest level in our country. Yes, even with cockroaches in the dining room you will not surprise anyone.
SUM rests only on individual teachers who sincerely try to convey knowledge to students.
Moscow city
17:39 19.11.2014
Negative impression
Dear parents, do not send your children to this "State University of Management". It's just awful! The hostel simply does not shine for your children, and prepare money, a lot of money. It is a shame for our country to have such universities. The housing commission does not work, the children have not been settled for six months. Only promises that cannot be trusted and a lot of lies.
Parents
Moscow city
17:20 19.11.2014
Negative impression
Dear parents! If you want to send your child to study 1000 km or more than 1000 km from your home, namely to this State University, then you will get nothing but deception. And prepare for your children a monthly amount for living in an expensive apartment in the capital of our country, the city of Moscow. What a mess was, apparently, in this university according to reviews, so it remained. You will be promised that your children will be settled in hostels, but this, I assure you, is not so. You will face another deception. This is a shame for such a seemingly prestigious university! Go where there is no such lies and falsehood. And there are universities in Moscow where you will not be deceived. And my advice to you is to listen to feedback sometimes. For those who are interested in this review, leave your phone number. WRITE. We will tell you in detail how the housing commission works at the SUM.
Vladimir
Moscow city
09:35 17.09.2014
Negative impression
If a person studied with you and is a friend, this does not mean that he is a good leader.
Our entire country is working on an outsourcing system, maybe it will be more profitable for your manager.
Anastasia
Moscow city
09:50 12.09.2014
Negative impression
My son is studying at SUM for the second year. Last year there was a normal hot meal. But this year started with chips - nothing else. If you have a normal lunch, then one change is not enough - you also need to grab a couple to stand in line. Everything is cold. Zero quality.
Moscow city
14:29 03.09.2014
Negative impression
I am a student mother. The son finished school well (without triples), a high USE score. He graduated from the 1st course of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, evening department at the branch in Lyubertsy. But the branch decided to close. They wanted to transfer to the SUM for a fee. Called the admissions office today. Apparently an old klusha is sitting there, who immediately began to accuse that my son was probably kicked out and no one would take him. After talking with her, I received a lot of negativity. Although I contacted the dean's office by mail and they wrote back that there would be no problems. It looks like GUM doesn't need paying students. They called several more state universities, they take them there without any problems. In one of them, the son went to apply.
ISSU student
Moscow city
23:48 28.08.2014
Positive impression
I want to remind everyone that when you graduate from high school, you become adults who will fight their own way. I did not study at other universities, but after graduating from school with a gold medal, I entered the State University of Management at the Institute of Information Systems (Management). My institute is much more complicated than others: the course of mathematics, design and programming is about 70%, the rest is the same subjects as other institutes: management, finance, logistics, psychology, sociology, foreign language (2 years), etc. When many have five days and 2 couples a day, we sat 6 days a week for 3-4. When others were walking, the students of my institute sat on endless assignments all night long. For the first time in my life, I was able to sleep 8 hours a week in order to have time to complete tasks for one week, despite the fact that I do everything regularly at other times. Teachers understand what to give students. Many of them are employees of very well-known IT companies. We are not given lectures, we learn how to work. So at the moment I am a senior student, but I work in a prestigious large company and I get quite serious money, despite my age. Most importantly, I know what I'm doing and I get great satisfaction from understanding myself as a specialist. Thank you very much to all the teachers of my institute. It is a pity that many highly qualified personnel were reduced, but I am glad that it was you who taught me. There are many opportunities here - job fairs, expensive software (SAP training, which is supported by the university itself), IBM products, BI platforms and much more, exchange training with universities in Asia and Europe, courses, student asset organizations, conferences and employment. You yourself choose whether to make yourself a man or barely get out of debt, leading an idle life. Unfortunately, it is the same in life, someone prefers the easy way and complaints about the government, lack of money and the high cost of living, while someone overcomes laziness, looking for opportunities and ways to develop. It is a pity that we enter the university as children, many of whom did not understand what a university is.
Sergey A
Moscow city
03:04 25.06.2014
Negative impression
I completely agree with the user "Answer for the user" Rooster ". At the institute, if I may say so, they don’t teach anything. Continuous theorizing of people who have not come into contact with real business even an inch.
All training in this institution consists of:
1) Payment of considerable sums in the bank "Dalena". For example, on the State management price tag - 270 thousand rubles. in year (!). It's not realistic to get on the budget. Only thieves come. Nothing has changed in 2 decades;
2) Sitting at meaningless lectures where they read material, firstly, adapted to the states, according to American textbooks and having nothing to do with the real state of affairs in the Russian Federation;
3) Cheating on answers to exams (materials, as it was rightly said, from the 90s).
Applicants! I don't recommend coming here. And not only here. Choose those universities where they fight in two skins and where studying will be more or less tolerable. Although in Russia there are few options in this regard.
P.S. Bots that will refute my review in every possible way, calm down already. Better focus on improving the quality of education in your Alma Mater. You are only engaged in populism and idle talk (like all teaching here).
Sergey A
In the annual RAEX ranking for 2019, the State University of Management left behind such universities as MIREA, Moscow Polytechnic University, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics,…
Sat, 14 Mar 2020
…
Tue, 3 Mar 2020
SUM is among the leaders in the rating "Russian universities through the eyes of students - 2020"
According to the results of the study "Russian universities through the eyes of students - 2020", the State University of Management was among the 15 best universities in Russia.…
Tue, 3 Mar 2020
State University of Management in the ranking of "100 best universities in Russia"
One of the results of the anniversary 2019 for SUM was the strengthening of the university's position in the rankings of higher educational institutions in Russia. Forbes magazine presented the ranking of the best universities,…
State University of Management in the TOP-10 of the Ranking of Higher Educational Institutions
The State University of Management entered the TOP-10 of the Ranking of Higher Educational Institutions, taking the 4th position in it.
In the III International competition of students and teachers of professional educational institutions Professional stars - ...
SUM institutes in the top 5 in the rating of Russian business schools according to the MBA.SU portal
According to the annual People's rating, which is compiled by the portal "MBA in Moscow and Russia", in 2019 the Graduate School of Business of the State University of Management took the 3rd place ....
Tue, 10 Sep 2019
The magazine "Management" entered the TOP-100 on the topic "Economics. Economic Sciences” in the Science Index ranking
The electronic library elibrary.ru has updated the indicators of scientific journals for 2018: the scientific journal "Upravlenie" entered the TOP-100 on the topic "Economics.…
SUM in the ranking of "100 best universities in Russia" according to Forbes
In the top three Moscow universities: the Institute of Economics and Finance of the State University of Management took third place in the ranking of Moscow universities in the field of "economics and finance" in terms of the demand for graduates in the labor market
According to one of the most influential recruiting portalsHH. EN, …
Interfax National Ranking of Universities: SUM is among the leaders in the development of further vocational education
According to the Interfax National University Ranking for 2019, the State University of Management ranks 2nd in terms of the number of students enrolled in CPE programs and 9th in terms of the share of income from the provision of additional education services.…
|
769 ratings
Good afternoon! I am a student of the State University of Management. I study at the 3rd year, the direction "Applied Mathematics and Informatics". For me, GUU is the university of freedom. You can study, be an activist, work, implement your plans and projects. What this university will definitely teach is to prioritize and highlight the important among everything!
|