I agree with this statement. Indeed, an essential

trait of each individual who has acquired character traits and becoming an individual - this is its own worldview. In general, worldview is one of the main philosophical

concepts, which is a set (system) of stable views, principles, assessments and beliefs, which determines the attitude to the surrounding reality. Everyone has their own attitude.

Unfortunately, many people are very stubborn and find it difficult to understand the views of another person. AT modern world it is dangerous to trust people, therefore, as the author of the statement A. Pop said, all views

"Like our clocks, they show different times, but everyone believes only

their own." And I think it's right. I myself have often

became a witness of how people, out of stupid gullibility, committed big mistakes and got into trouble.

There are many examples in the literature when the views of people diverged quite seriously. For example, the famous poet Mayakovsky was initially denied by many contemporaries, in their opinion, this poet wrote the wrong poems. However, Mayakovsky did not listen to anyone and wrote such poems as he wanted. We know the result - the famous poems of this poet are still loved by thousands of people.

From all of the above, we can conclude that the views of people are really different - each person has their own. And need

clearly understand when you need to listen to others, and when you need to listen to yourself and go your own way.

The point is not that human abilities are manifested in activity, but that they are created in it. (B. Teplov)

This statement is connected with the problem of the development of human abilities. This problem is important for social science as a whole, since the further development of society depends on the development of man. B. Teplov believes that abilities not only manifest themselves in activity, but also arise and form. I agree with the author's opinion, because without constant improvement, a person's abilities can come to naught.

Under the ability of a person understand his natural talent in something. There are such levels of abilities as inclinations,

ability, talent and genius. A person can develop inclinations into ability, and then into talent only in activity, that is, in the form of social activity aimed at transforming reality. At the same time, in order to achieve great success in anything, you need to be quite hardworking and purposeful. So, the hero of Jack London's novel "Martin Eden", seeking the love of a girl and position in society, improving his literary gift, achieved recognition and became a famous writer.

My idol, rhythmic gymnast Alina Kabaeva, also became talented thanks to hard training and self-improvement.

Thus, we can conclude that human abilities require constant development, and they can be developed only in activity.

Our views are like our clocks: they all show different times, but everyone believes only their own” A.Pop

On the one hand, I agree with the author of this aphorism, but on the other hand, I see options for how it can be challenged. The meaning of this statement is that each person forms his own views. And due to the fact that how many people, so many opinions, then the views can be different. Views are the confidence of a person that does not require any evidence. These are ideas and values ​​that a person chooses for himself, based on the level of education, upbringing, general outlook, under the influence of various social factors of life. Views are the basis for a person's worldview. A worldview is already a system of a person's views on the world and his place in it. From the course of social science, we know that the worldview can be scientific, religious, everyday, humanistic. The worldview is subject to change throughout a person's life, again under the influence of any life events. Our political views, for example, are really like clockwork: they show different values ​​and priorities, everyone believes only his own watch. My views and worldview probably have not yet been fully formed into a clear position. But I can say that I share the values ​​of Christianity and the Christian faith; in the political sphere, I cannot give preference to any party. On the other hand, one could object to the author, because in the conditions of the communist Soviet society, the main masses sincerely shared the same political views, moreover, dissent was sometimes severely punished. Those. much depends on the state, what kind of political regime it has, whether there is freedom of conscience, speech and pluralism. But in any case, for example, representatives of the religious and scientific worldview, colliding in disputes about the creation of the world, as a rule, remain unconvinced.

Thus, in a modern democratic society, every person has the right to profess and hold his views in the presence of a mass of others, sometimes opposite ones. Everyone believes in his idea and this is his right.

Punishment cannot be eternal, but guilt endures forever” (saying from Roman law)

I share this point of view, since guilt as a mental attitude of an individual to what he has done can be continued indefinitely by a conscientious person, while punishment, as a rule, has temporal and other boundaries. In this I see the main meaning of the saying. From the course of social science, we come across the concept of "guilt" when studying the topic "Offences and legal liability". Guilt is the subjective side of the offense, which includes the motives and goals of the person committing the wrongful act (omission). Guilt may include intent or negligence. In addition, guilt is one of the four main signs of an offense, in addition to wrongfulness, danger to society and punishability. Punishment in criminal law is a measure of state coercion, appointed by a court verdict; it is the deprivation or restriction of rights and freedoms. Punishment in this case has a formal expression, it is limited by the principles of the court and the law. And the feeling of guilt, the denunciation of conscience can have no boundaries in time. True, there is a necessary condition for this - the presence of that same human conscience. Because there are different kinds legal liability (civil, administrative, disciplinary, criminal), the punishment in the ordinary sense of the word may be different. But even the punishment of a child for any duty in the family is always limited and cannot last forever. From personal experience I know that for my misdeed I have already been forgiven, and even forgotten, and I, even after a long time, worry about this. By the way, Christian teaching says that a person who has repented of his sins and turned away from evil deeds is not condemned by God and should not condemn himself, but should forgive himself. And to some extent, this refutes the thesis "guilt abides forever."

Thus, guilt can be infinite in a moral person, while punishment is provided for a certain period.

I agree with this statement. Indeed, an essential

the trait of each individual who has acquired characteristic features and become an individuality is his own worldview. In general, worldview is one of the main philosophical

concepts, which is a set (system) of stable views, principles, assessments and beliefs, which determines the attitude to the surrounding reality. Everyone has their own attitude.

Unfortunately, many people are very stubborn and find it difficult to understand the views of another person. In the modern world, it is dangerous to trust people, therefore, as the author of the statement A. Pop said, all views

"Like our clocks, they show different times, but everyone believes only

their own." And I think it's right. I myself have often

I witnessed how people, out of stupid gullibility, made big mistakes and got into unpleasant situations.

There are many examples in the literature when the views of people diverged quite seriously. For example, the famous poet Mayakovsky was initially denied by many contemporaries, in their opinion, this poet wrote the wrong poems. However, Mayakovsky did not listen to anyone and wrote such poems as he wanted. We know the result - the famous poems of this poet are still loved by thousands of people.

From all of the above, we can conclude that the views of people are really different - each person has their own. And need

clearly understand when you need to listen to others, and when you need to listen to yourself and go your own way.

The point is not that human abilities are manifested in activity, but that they are created in it. (B. Teplov)

This statement is connected with the problem of the development of human abilities. This problem is important for social science as a whole, since the further development of society depends on the development of man. B. Teplov believes that abilities not only manifest themselves in activity, but also arise and form. I agree with the author's opinion, because without constant improvement, a person's abilities can come to naught.

Under the ability of a person understand his natural talent in something. There are such levels of abilities as inclinations,

ability, talent and genius. A person can develop inclinations into ability, and then into talent only in activity, that is, in the form of social activity aimed at transforming reality. At the same time, in order to achieve great success in anything, you need to be quite hardworking and purposeful. So, the hero of Jack London's novel "Martin Eden", seeking the love of a girl and position in society, improving his literary gift, achieved recognition and became a famous writer.

In general, worldview is one of the basic philosophical concepts, which is a set (system) of stable views, principles, assessments and beliefs, which determines the attitude to the surrounding reality. Everyone has their own attitude.

Unfortunately, many people are very stubborn and find it difficult to understand the views of another person. In the modern world, it is dangerous to trust people, therefore, as the author of the statement A. Pop said, all views are “like our clock, they show different times, but everyone believes only their own.” And I think it's right. I personally have more than once witnessed how people, out of stupid gullibility, made big mistakes and got into unpleasant situations.

There are many examples in the literature when the views of people diverged quite seriously. For example, the famous poet Mayakovsky was initially denied by many contemporaries, in their opinion, this poet wrote the wrong poems. However, Mayakovsky did not listen to anyone and wrote such poems as he wanted. We know the result - the famous poems of this poet are still loved by thousands of people.

From all of the above, we can conclude that the views of people are really different - each person has their own. And you need to clearly understand when you need to listen to others, and when you need to listen to yourself and go your own way.

Essay on the topic “Our views are like clocks - everyone shows different times, but everyone believes only their own” updated: November 6, 2018 by: Scientific Articles.Ru

In his statement, A. Pop raises an urgent problem - the problem of worldview. Worldview is a system of human views on nature and society. Worldview is an important feature of the individual, influencing the formation of personality. An individual is a single person with certain biological characteristics.

Personality is a person as a subject social relations. Each person has his own view of the world (his own watch). We are used to looking at our watches, believing only ourselves, because most often, listening to the opinions of others, we make mistakes. Unfortunately, in today's world, it becomes more difficult for us to trust others. And no matter how wrong we are, we will insist on our own (our clock shows like this).

There is also a divergence of worldviews in the field of art. Suffice it to recall Van Gogh. His work was not recognized by his contemporaries, during his lifetime he sold only one of his paintings. Now his work is highly valued.

Also, do not forget about Galileo Galilei, because he was criticized by those who took part in religion. Now his discoveries are great, and every child knows his name.

From this we can conclude: people's opinions differ, and it is not always worth trusting other people's "clocks".

I tried to highlight the main aspects to which, in my opinion, the author of this quote wanted to draw our attention and, as proof of my innocence, I gave several examples from our lives that strongly support my words. In my opinion, each of us should listen to the words of this great man, not just because he uttered this thought.

Updated: 2018-03-11

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

Useful material on the topic