The results of the activities of the elected are glad. Chosen Rada of Ivan the Terrible. Reforms of the Elected Rada

The term itself is found only in the work of Kurbsky, while Russian sources of that time do not give this circle of people any official name.

Creation

The formation of a select circle of people around the tsar takes place after the Moscow events of the summer of 1547: a fire, and then an uprising of Muscovites. According to Kurbsky's version, during these events, archpriest Sylvester appeared to the king, and "a terrible spell from Holy Scripture threatened the king<...>to<...>stop his rampages and temper his violent temper.

Compound

The composition of the Chosen Rada is the subject of discussion. Definitely, the priest of the Kremlin's Annunciation Cathedral, the tsar's confessor Sylvester and a young figure from a not too noble family A.F. Adashev participated in the "Rada".

On the other hand, some historians deny the existence of the Chosen Rada as an institution led exclusively by the three above-mentioned persons.

Reforms of the Chosen One are glad:

1549 The First Zemsky Sobor - an organ of class representation, providing a link between the center and places, Ivan IV's speech from the execution place: condemnation of the wrong boyar rule, announcement of the need for reforms.
Sudebnik of 1550 - development of the provisions of the Sudebnik of Ivan III, limiting the power of governors and volosts, strengthening the control of the tsarist administration, a single amount of court fees, preserving the right of peasants to go to St. George's Day.
The Stoglavy Cathedral of 1551 - the unification of church rites, the recognition of all locally revered saints as all-Russian, the establishment of a rigid icon-painting canon, requirements for improving the morals of the clergy, the prohibition of usury among priests.
Military reform of 1556 - the Code of Service was adopted: restriction of localism for the period of hostilities, in addition to the equestrian local militia, the organization of a permanent army - archers, gunners, a single order of military service.
Formation of the command system:
- Ambassadorial order - foreign policy
- Petition order (Adashev) - the highest control body
- The local order was in charge of land ownership
- Robbery order searched and judged
- The Streltsy order was in charge of the created Streltsy army
- Bit - a noble army, the appointment of a governor
- Grand Parish - tax collection
- Yamskoy - postal service and stations
- Zemsky - law enforcement in Moscow
The continuation of the lip reform - the abolition of feeding, all power in the districts passed to the elected lip and zemstvo elders, and in the cities - to the favorite heads.

The reforms of the Elected Rada outlined the path to strengthening, centralization of the state, contributed to the formation of a class-representative state.

Fall of the Chosen Rada

The reason for the royal disgrace is some historians [ who?] see that Ivan IV was dissatisfied with the disagreements of some members of the Rada with the late Anastasia Zakharyina-Yuryeva, the first wife of the tsar. This is also confirmed by the fact that after the death of his second wife, Maria Temryukovna, Ivan the Terrible also arranged the executions of those who were objectionable to the tsarina and accused the boyars of having “exterminated” (poisoned) Maria.

In 1553 Ivan the Terrible fell ill. The disease was so severe that the Boyar Duma raised the question of the transfer of power. Ivan forced the boyars to swear allegiance to their infant son, Tsarevich Dmitry. But among the members of the Rada, an idea arose to transfer the Moscow throne to the tsar's cousin, Vladimir, Prince Staritsky. In particular, Sylvester noted that Vladimir's quality is that he loves advisers. However, Ivan recovered from his illness, and the conflict, at first glance, was settled. But the king did not forget this story and later used it against Sylvester and Adashev.

The main contradiction was the radical difference between the views of the tsar and the Rada on the issue of centralization of power in the state (the process of centralization is the process of concentration state power). Ivan IV wanted to force this process. The elected Rada chose the path of gradual and painless reform.

Historical estimates

Among historians, there is no unambiguous assessment of the activities of the Chosen Rada.

Karamzin notes the positive features of the government of the Chosen Rada, emphasizing the “wise moderation” and “philanthropy” of the tsarist government: “Everywhere the people blessed the government’s zeal for the common good, everywhere they replaced unworthy Rulers: they punished with contempt or prison, but without excessive severity; they wanted to commemorate a happy state change not by the cruel execution of thin old officials, but by the best election of new ones ... ".

In Kostomarov, the influence of the "circle of favorites" is such that "without a meeting with the people of this elected council, Ivan not only did not arrange anything, but did not even dare to think", in this influence the historian sees a "bitter humiliation" for the autocracy of Ivan IV.

Notes

Links

Elected Rada- article from the Great Soviet Encyclopedia
Yelyanov E. Subjective Interpretations: Russian Historians on the Era of Ivan the Terrible

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010 .

See what the "Chosen Rada" is in other dictionaries:

The unofficial government of the Russian state in the late 1540s-1550s. The Chosen Rada included close associates of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible. A prominent position in the Chosen Rada was occupied by the Duma nobleman A.F. Adashev, court priest Sylvester, ... ... Political science. Dictionary.

CHOSEN RADA, the unofficial government of the Russian state under Tsar Ivan IV, in the late 40s and 50s. 16th century (A.F. Adashev, Sylvester, Makariy, A.M. Kurbsky and others). Supporters of a compromise between various ruling strata, accession ... ... Modern Encyclopedia

The first Russian Tsar Ivan Vasilievich IV the Terrible was born on August 25, 1530, died on March 18, 1584.

After the death of Vasily III in 1533, his three-year-old son Ivan IV took over the throne. In fact, his mother, Elena Vasilievna, the daughter of Prince Glinsky, a native of Lithuania, ruled the state. Both during the reign of Elena, and after her death (1538; there is an assumption that she was poisoned), the struggle for power between the boyar groups of Belsky, Shuisky, Glinsky did not stop.

Boyar rule led to a weakening of the central government, and the arbitrariness of the votchinniki had a serious effect on the position of the masses, causing discontent and open speeches in a number of Russian cities.

The boy-sovereign, by nature smart, lively, impressionable and observant, grew up in an atmosphere of abandonment and neglect. Thus, a feeling of hostility and hatred for the boyars as his enemies and thieves of power formed early in the boy's soul. The ugly scenes of boyar self-will and violence, and his own helplessness and impotence, developed in him timidity, suspicion, distrust of people, and on the other hand, disregard for the human person and human dignity.

Having a lot of free time at his disposal, Ivan indulged in reading and re-read all the books that he could find in the palace. His only sincere friend and spiritual mentor was Metropolitan Macarius (since 1542), the famous compiler of the Four Menaia, a huge collection of all church literature known at that time in Russia.

The young Grand Duke was not yet 17 years old when his uncle Mikhail Glinsky and his grandmother Princess Anna managed to prepare a political act of great national importance. January 16, 1547 Grand Duke Ivan Vasilyevich of Moscow and All Russia was solemnly crowned with the title of Tsar Ivan IV. The ceremony of taking the royal title took place in the Assumption Cathedral of the Kremlin. From the hands of the Moscow Metropolitan Macarius, who developed the ritual of crowning the king, Ivan IV received the Monomakh's hat and other regalia of royal power. The Church, as it were, affirmed the divine origin of royal power, but at the same time strengthened its own authority. Upon completion of the wedding rite, the Grand Duke became the “God-crowned Tsar”.

Thus, the new title - tsar - not only sharply emphasized the sovereignty of the Russian monarch in external relations, especially with the Horde khanates (khans in Russia were called tsars), but also separated the sovereign from his subjects more clearly than before. The royal title secured the transformation of vassal princes into subjects. From now on, the capital of the state, Moscow, was adorned with a new title - it became the “royal city”, and the Russian land became the Russian kingdom. But for the peoples of Russia one of the most tragic periods of its history began. The “time of Ivan the Terrible” has come.

By the way, Russia as the name of the state appears in Russian sources in the second half of the 16th century. The term "Russia" in its origin is not Russian, but Greek. It has been known in Byzantium since the 10th century. and was used in the lists of eparchs: the great princes in Greek were called archons of all Russia. During the wedding of Ivan IV, in order to give the person more authority, they returned to this “foreign” word.

The term "Muscovite State" along with the name "Russia" was used in official documents in the 16th-17th centuries. Russian began to mean belonging to the state, and "Russian" - to the ethnos (nationality).

On June 21, 1547, a severe fire broke out in Moscow. The flames raged for two days. The city was almost completely burned out. About 4 thousand Muscovites died in the fire. Ivan IV and his entourage, fleeing from smoke and fire, hid in the village of Vorobyevo. The cause of the fire was sought in the actions of real people. Rumors spread that the fire was the work of the Glinskys, with whose name the people associated hard years boyar rule.

In the Kremlin, on the square near the Assumption Cathedral, a veche gathered. One of the Glinskys was torn to pieces by the insurgent people. The yards of their supporters and relatives were burned and looted. With great difficulty, the government managed to suppress the uprising. Actions against the feudal lords took place in the cities of Opochka, and somewhat later in Pskov and Ustyug.

Popular performances showed that the country needs reforms. The further development of the country required the strengthening of statehood, the centralization of power. The nobility showed particular interest in reforms. A talented publicist of that time, nobleman Ivan Semenovich Peresvetov, was his peculiar ideologist. He turned to the king with messages in which the program of transformations was outlined. These proposals of Peresvetov largely anticipated the actions of Ivan IV.

Based on the interests of the nobility, I.S. Peresvetov sharply condemned the boyars' arbitrariness. He saw the ideal state structure in a strong royal power, based on the nobility. “A state without a thunderstorm is like a horse without a bridle,” I.S. Peresvetov.

With the participation of Metropolitan Macarius, those people who were destined in the eyes of contemporaries to symbolize the new government - the "Chosen Rada" were surrounded by the young tsar. Around 1549 a new government took shape. It was called the Chosen Rada - so A. Kurbsky called it in the Polish manner in one of his writings. The composition of the Chosen Rada is not entirely clear. It was headed by A.F.Adashev, who came from a rich but not very noble family. Representatives of various strata of the ruling class participated in the work of the Elected Rada: princes D. Kurlyatev, M. Vorotynsky, Moscow Metropolitan Macarius and the priest of the Annunciation Cathedral of the Kremlin (the home church of the Moscow tsars) Sylvester, the clerk of the Ambassadorial order I. Viskovaty. The composition of the Elected Rada, as it were, reflected a compromise between the various strata of the ruling class. The elected council lasted until 1560 and was the body that carried out the transformations that were called the reforms of the middle of the 16th century.

On February 27, 1549, the First Zemsky Sobor was convened. He decided to draw up a new Code of Laws (approved in 1550) and formulated a program of reforms in the mid-16th century. According to experts, more than 50 Zemsky Sobors took place; The last Zemsky Sobors in Russia met in the 80s. 16th century The Zemsky Sobors included the Boyar Duma, the Consecrated Cathedral - representatives of the higher clergy; many Zemsky Sobors were also attended by representatives of the nobility and the top tenants.

1. Under the Elected Rada, an order system is drawn up government controlled. Even before the reforms of the middle of the XVI century. individual branches of state administration of individual territories began to be entrusted (“ordered”, as they were then called) to the boyars. This is how the first orders-institutions appeared that were in charge of branches of government or individual regions of the country. In the middle of the XVI century. there were already two dozen orders. Military affairs were led by the Discharge Order (in charge of the local army), Pushkarsky (artillery), Streletsky (archers), the Armory (Arsenal), Foreign Affairs was in charge of the Ambassadorial Order, state lands distributed to the nobles, the Local Order; serfs - serf order. There were orders that were in charge of certain territories: the order of the Siberian Palace ruled Siberia; order of the Kazan Palace - by the annexed Kazan Khanate.

At the head of the order was a boyar or clerk - a major government official. Orders were in charge of administration, tax collection and court. With the increasing complexity of the tasks of public administration, the number of orders grew. By the time of Peter's reforms at the beginning of the 18th century. there were about 50 of them. The design of the order system made it possible to centralize the administration of the country.

2. It should be noted that at first the Elected Rada was not going to radically change the established order of local government. The Code of Laws of Ivan IV only clarified the rights and obligations of feeders (governors - in counties and volosts - in volosts) and at the same time expanded the competence of zemstvo elders and tselovalniks, turning them into permanent jurors (before that, they simply acted as witnesses at the court of governors and volosts ).

On the ground, a unified management system gradually began to be created. The collection of local taxes was previously entrusted to the boyars-feeders. They were in fact the rulers of individual lands. All funds collected in excess of the necessary taxes to the treasury, i.e., were at their personal disposal. they "feed" at the expense of managing the lands. In 1556 feedings were cancelled. On the ground, management (investigation and court on especially important state cases) was transferred into the hands of the labial elders (lip-okrug), elected from local nobles, zemstvo elders - from among the wealthy strata among the black-sowed population where there was no noble land ownership, and city clerks or favorite heads in the cities. Thus, in the middle of the XVI century. the apparatus of state power was formed in the form of a class-representative monarchy.

3. Sudebnik 1550

The general trend of centralization of the country and the state apparatus led to the publication of a new collection of laws, the Sudebnik of 1550. Taking the Sudebnik of Ivan III as a basis, the compilers of the new Sudebnik made changes to it related to the strengthening of central power. It confirmed the right of the peasants to move on St. George's Day and the payment for the "elderly" was increased. The feudal lord was now responsible for the crimes of his peasants, which increased their personal dependence on the master. For the first time, punishment for bribery was introduced.

4. Even under Elena Glinskaya, a monetary reform was launched. The Moscow ruble has become the main payment unit in the country. The right to collect trade duties passed into the hands of the state. The population of the country was obliged to bear the tax - a complex of natural and monetary duties. In the middle of the XVI century. a single unit of taxation for the entire state was established - a large plow. Depending on the fertility of the soil, as well as the social status of the owner of the land, the plow was 400-600 hectares of land. The tax reform further worsened the position of the masses.

5. Military reform

Much has been done to strengthen the country's forces. The core of the army was the noble militia. Near Moscow, a “chosen thousand” was planted on the ground - 1070 provincial nobles, who, in the opinion of the tsar, were to become the mainstay of power.

The "Code of Service" was drawn up. An votchinnik or landowner could start service from the age of 15 and pass it on by inheritance. From 150 acres of land, both the boyar and the nobleman had to put up one warrior and appear at the reviews “horse, crowded and armed”.

A big step forward in the organization of the military forces of Russia was the creation in 1550 of a permanent archery army. At first, there were three thousand archers. In addition, foreigners began to be recruited into the army, the number of which was insignificant. Artillery was reinforced. The Cossacks were involved in carrying out the border service.

The boyars and nobles who made up the militia were called “service people in the fatherland”, i.e. by origin. Another group of persons was made up of “service people according to the device” (i.e., according to recruitment). In addition to the archers, there were gunners (artillerymen), city guards, and Cossacks were close to them. The rear work (convoy, construction of fortifications) was carried out by the "staff" - a militia from among the black-eared, monastic peasants and townspeople.

6. Restriction of localism

At the time of military campaigns, localism was limited - the procedure for filling positions depending on the nobility and service career of the ancestors. In the middle of the XVI century. An official reference book was compiled - “The Sovereign Genealogy”, which streamlined local disputes.

7. Church councils

Significant reforms were carried out in the life of the church. During the period of feudal fragmentation, each principality had its own, “revered”, saints. In 1549, the church council conducted the canonization of the “new wonderworkers”: the local saints became all-Russian, and a single pantheon was created for the whole country. In 1551 a new church council took place.

Stoglavy Cathedral

In 1551, on the initiative of the tsar and the metropolitan, the Council of the Russian Church met, which received the name Stoglavy, since its decisions were formulated in one hundred chapters. The decisions of the clergy reflected the changes associated with the centralization of the state. The council approved the adoption of the Sudebnik of 1550 and the reforms of Ivan IV. From among the local saints revered in individual Russian lands, an all-Russian list was compiled. Ritualism was streamlined and unified throughout the country. Even art was subject to regulation.

The Stoglavy Cathedral of 1551 drew a line under the historical dispute between the Josephites and non-possessors. Even before its convocation in September 1550, an agreement was reached between the tsar and Metropolitan Macarius (1542-1568), according to which the monasteries were forbidden to establish new settlements in the cities, and to establish new courtyards in the old ones. Posad people were expelled from the monastery settlements, hiding there from the burden of the draft. In the future, churchmen could buy land and receive it as a gift only with the royal permission. Thus, in the issue of monastic landownership, the line on its restriction and control by the king won.

Even under Ivan III and Vasily III, the issue of church land ownership was acute. A number of clergy, whose spiritual forerunner was Nil Sorsky (1433-1508), advocated the monasteries' refusal from land ownership and strict asceticism (hence their name - non-possessors). Against this struggled another group of church leaders, headed by hegumen Joseph Volotsky (1439-1515), who believed that only a rich church could fulfill its high mission in the state. In the reign of Basil Shi, the Josephites (money-grubbers) prevailed.

During the Stoglavy Council, the issue of church lands was raised again. It was decided to keep the lands of churches and monasteries, but in the future, their acquisition or receiving as a gift could be carried out only after a report to the king.

Reforms of the middle of the XVI century. significantly strengthened the central government and state administration, which allowed Ivan IV to move on to solving the problems of foreign policy.

Agreement between the king and his closest advisers, i.e. Sylvester and Adashev did not last long: the ardent power-hungry John soon began to be weighed down by the influence of his favorites. This was also joined by their rivalry with the Zakharyins, the tsarina's relatives, and Anastasia herself's dislike for them.

The beginning of this disposition is attributed to 1553. Soon after the Kazan campaign, the tsar fell into a serious illness; wrote a spiritual one, appointed his son, the infant Demetrius, as heir, and demanded that the boyars swear allegiance to him. Then there was noise and scolding in the palace: some took the oath, others refused on the grounds that Demetrius was still small and the Zakharins would rule instead of him, that it was better for an adult to be a sovereign, while they pointed to the royal cousin Vladimir (son of Andrei Staritsky) , the latter also did not want to swear allegiance to Dimitri, Sylvester and Adashev's father took the side of the disobedient boyars. Only after the persistent persuasion of the king and the nobles loyal to him did the opposing side yield. John recovered, although he showed no signs of displeasure at first, but he could not forget this incident and began to look suspiciously at the people around him. The queen also considered herself offended.

After his recovery, John, with his wife and little Demetrius, took a vow to go on a pilgrimage to the Kirillov Belozersky Monastery. First, the tsar stopped at the Trinity Lavra. Here, - says Prince Kurbsky in his History of Ivan the Terrible, - the famous Maxim the Greek talked to him and persuaded him not to undertake such a long and difficult journey, but rather to alleviate the fate of the widows and orphans who remained after the soldiers who fell under the walls of Kazan. But the tsar went by water to Kirillov. The journey was really unfortunate: John lost his son. On the way, in a monastery, he saw Vassian, the former Bishop of Kolomna, and asked him how it was necessary to reign in order to have nobles in obedience. “If you want to be an autocrat,” Vassian replied, “then don’t keep advisers smarter than yourself” (an allusion to Sylvester and Adashev).

Seeing John's cooling towards himself, Sylvester himself retired from the court, and the king sent Adashev to Livonia (to the army). In 1560 Anastasia died. At court they started talking that Sylvester and Adashev had exhausted the queen. The tsar imprisoned Sylvester in the Solovetsky Monastery, and Alexei Adashev was imprisoned (in Yuriev). Relatives and supporters of the accused were exiled or executed.

Oprichnina of Ivan IV (the Terrible):

purpose and means of its implementation

On December 3, 1564, Ivan IV with his family and close associates suddenly went on a pilgrimage to the Trinity-Sergius Monastery to the tomb of Sergius of Radonezh. Having lingered near Moscow due to the sudden onset of mud, the tsar, by the end of December, reached Alexandrovskaya Sloboda (now the city of Alexandrov Vladimir region), where Ivan III and Vasily III. From there, on January 3, 1565, a messenger arrived in Moscow, who brought two letters.

The first, addressed to the metropolitan, reported that “the sovereign laid his wrath on all bishops and abbots of monasteries, and on all service people, from boyars to ordinary nobles, because service people drain his treasury, serve poorly, and church hierarchs cover them” . He asked for a special lot for him. The term "oprichnina" comes from the word "oprich" - except. This is how Ivan IV called the territory, which he asked to allocate to himself as a special lot.

In the second message, addressed to the townspeople, the tsar reported on the decision made and added that he had no complaints against the townspeople.

It was a well-calculated political maneuver. Using the faith of the people in the tsar, Ivan the Terrible expected to be called back to the throne. Soon a crowded deputation beat him with their foreheads, begging him to return to the kingdom. The tsar dictated his conditions: the right of unlimited autocratic power and the establishment of the oprichnina. The country was divided into two parts: the oprichnina and the zemshchina.

For the maintenance of his new court, or personal inheritance, Ivan IV took over 10 cities with counties, separate volosts, several settlements near Moscow, and even several streets in Moscow itself. The tsar granted his faithful servants land, not stopping before the eviction of the former votchinniks and landowners), some of them simply moved to the oprichnina (to the “zemstvo” districts. The new servants chosen for her were obliged to obey exclusively the tsar. The guardsmen dressed in black, whose corps originally numbered a thousand people, they were called upon to “gnaw” the tsar’s enemies and “sweep out” treason from the country (dog heads and brooms were attached to their saddles, symbolizing the canine devotion of the guardsmen to the tsar and their readiness to sweep treason out of the country).

With an increase in the number of oprichnina troops (up to 6 thousand people), the oprichnina possessions and the zone of special (oprichnina) administration expanded. The rest of the territory of the state constituted the “zemshchina”, remaining under the jurisdiction of the “zemstvo” boyars, who ruled according to the will of Tsar Ivan “according to the old custom” (i.e., the Boyar Duma).

The introduction of the oprichnina (1565-1572) was preceded by a number of events that had an undeniable impact on the state of mind of Ivan IV.

So, in 1554, he became aware of the boyar sympathies for the staritsky prince Vladimir Andreevich, which manifested themselves during his serious illness in 1553.

It was then that he first began to distrust Adashev and Sylvester. In 1557-1558. The tsar faced boyar opposition to the course of unleashing the Livonian War. He did not find support in this matter and the Chosen Rada.

In 1560, Ivan IV was deeply distressed by the death of his beloved wife, Anastasia Romanovna. Then there was his final break with Sylvester and Adashev. Suspected of infidelity, the closest advisers to the king were removed from the court, and then sent into exile.

A real flurry of emotions caused the tsar to escape the voivode Prince Andrey Kurbsky to Lithuania (1564). After this, the persecution of the boyars was intensified.

Undoubtedly, each of these events could somehow influence the change in political course in 1565. It seems, however, that the transition to the oprichnina was due not so much to the personal motives of Tsar Ivan, but to the objective contradictions (political and social) of the internal structure of the Muscovite state:

1. Relations between the monarch and the boyar aristocracy remained disordered and unsettled.

2. An active military policy and the need for a constant increase in the number of troops forced the state to systematically subordinate the interests of producers (peasants, artisans and merchants) to the interests of the service class.

Both contradictions in their development in the second half of the XVI century. created a state crisis.

Indeed, the titled boyars at that time occupied all the highest positions in the central and local administration, commanded the Moscow regiments (very often the former specific prince continued to rule his inheritance as the Moscow governor). At the same time, the boyars were dissatisfied with the burdensome military service and other duties entrusted to them by the supreme power, and bitterly regretted the lost benefits of their former specific independence. The Moscow sovereigns did not always take into account his opinion and advice.

Grand Duke Vasily Ivanovich called the boyars "smerds". The omnipotence enjoyed by the titled nobility in the years of Ivan the Terrible's youth should have increased their dissatisfaction with the strengthening of the position of their matured sovereign, who became the "tsar". Part of the boyars doubted his right to single-handedly dispose of state power and pass it on by inheritance.

The attempts of the Chosen Rada to mitigate the contradictions of the boyars with the tsar and the nobility ended in failure. It is possible that in carrying out structural changes, she showed more pandering to the boyar interests than the tsar wanted. In addition, the tsar and his advisers had different concepts of centralization, and their rivalry ended with the victory of the concept of Ivan the Terrible.

At the same time, one should not overestimate the anti-boyar orientation of the oprichnina policy. It is estimated that at the beginning of the XVII century. the prince's patrimony, on average, was twice the area of the noble estate.

Oprichnina was a system of internal political measures of a predominantly repressive nature, was not something unified for seven years:

1. At the very beginning of the oprichnina rule (1565/), about 100 of the 282 princes were sent to Kazan exile with simultaneous confiscation from the patrimonial estates.

2. Then came the turn of the boyars and zemstvo nobles (only in the "case" of the boyar I.P. Fedorov in 1568, 500 people were executed.).

Among the guardsmen, Prince A.I. Vyazemsky, the boyar Vasily Gryaznoy and the nobleman G.L. Malyuta Skuratov-Belsky, who was in charge of executions and torture.

In an effort to destroy the separatism of the feudal nobility, Ivan IV did not stop at any cruelty. Oprichnina terror began, executions, exile. Major church leaders were among the first to die at the hands of the guardsmen: in 1568 - Archimandrite German, in 1569 in Tver the deposed Metropolitan Philip was strangled by Skuratov, who publicly refused the tsar's blessing. In the autumn of the same year, the entire family of Prince Vladimir Staritsky was destroyed and he himself was killed.

Tsar Ivan Vasilievich "thrashed" Novgorod the Great. The reason for this terrible action was a false denunciation that the Novgorodians allegedly want to come under the authority of the Polish king, and Tsar Ivan himself to be "lime" and put in his place the staritsa appanage prince Vladimir Andreevich. The pogrom lasted more than five weeks - from January 6 to February 13, 1570, when 500-600 people were “plunged into the water” (under the ice) daily, and on other days up to 1500 people.

In the summer of 1570, with the personal participation of Ivan IV, mass repressions unfolded in Moscow, where about a hundred people were executed. The terror was all the more terrible because it was completely unpredictable. On average, there were 3-4 ordinary landowners per killed boyar, and 10 commoners per 1 landowner. In 1570, the turn came to the organizers of the oprichnina themselves: they were all killed no less brutally than they killed themselves. The bloody list was closed by the direct creators of the oprichnina - the father and son of the Basmanovs, Prince Athanasius Vyazemsky, Mikhail Cherkassky (brother of Maria Temryukovna, Russian Empress 1561-1569).

The end of the oprichnina was helped, paradoxically, by the Crimean Khan Devlet-Girey, who broke through to Moscow in the summer of 1571 through the fault of the oprichnina army, which offered no resistance to him. Khan did not besiege the city, but managed to set fire to it. Moscow burned to the ground, the bodies of the burnt and suffocated were removed for almost two months. Ivan the Terrible realized that mortal danger hung over the state.

In the summer of 1572, Devlet-Giray repeated his campaign against Moscow. The tsar appointed Mikhail Ivanovich Vorotynsky commander of the troops.

The united army on June 30, 1572, near the village of Molodi (about 45 km south of Moscow, near Podolsk), utterly defeated Devlet Giray. Even the famous Crimean commander Divey-Murza was captured. The country was saved. Tsar Ivan thanked Vorotynsky in his own way: less than a year later he was executed on the denunciation of his serf, who claimed that Vorotynsky wanted to bewitch the king.

Most historians believe that in the fall of 1572 the tsar abolished the oprichnina. However, the executions of the “conspirators” did not stop. In 1573, the governor Prince M.I. died of torture. Vorotynsky, who defeated Devlet Giray in the Battle of Molodin in 1572. In 1575, Ivan IV tried to return to the oprichnina order. He again secured his “destiny”, leaving formally to govern the country to the baptized Tatar Khan Simeon Bekbulatovich, who was titled “Grand Duke of All Russia”. The reign of Simeon lasted less than a year, then Ivan IV returned to the throne again. The mass terror has stopped. However, since the lawlessness, “busy people” continued until the death of Ivan the Terrible, some scientists (S.M. Soloviev, S.F. Platonov, P.A. Sadikov) considered the oprichnina in the chronological framework of 1565-1584.

What are the immediate and long-term results of the oprichnina?

1. Over the seven years of the oprichnina, the country has made significant progress along the path of centralization: the influence of the titled Moscow boyars has weakened; with the death of Vladimir Staritsky, the last specific principality disappeared; with the deposition of Metropolitan Philip Kolychev, the former relations between the state and the church were violated; with the defeat of Novgorod, the social independence of the “third estate” was finally undermined.

At the same time, it should be borne in mind that the oprichnina policy, carried out in the absence of sufficient socio-economic prerequisites for centralization (in the 16th century, the state did not yet have the necessary funds to maintain a numerous bureaucracy, regular troops, developed punitive bodies, separated from the estate of landowners), with inevitably gave rise to such relapses of decentralization, such as, for example, the division of the country into oprichnina and zemshchina.

2. The oprichnina led to an aggravation of the economic crisis: a significant area was not cultivated, the “taxable population”, fleeing the burden of ever new state duties, landlord enslavement, hunger and disease, especially in the late 60s - early 70s of the 16th century, fled to the southern and eastern outskirts of the state. This flow, continuing until the end of the 16th century, led to the fact that vast areas of the central and northwestern counties were half empty. Villages in the 70s and 80s overgrown with forest, arable land turned into pastures for livestock.

Oprichnina gave new impetus to the process of enslavement. Having an anti-peasant orientation, it helped many service people to acquire land and peasants, and in those areas where not only large boyar land ownership did not prevail, but where feudal-serf relations in general were distinguished by comparative immaturity. The first serfdom decrees that forbade peasants to leave their former owners even on St. George's Day, in the so-called reserved years, appeared in the early 80s, even under Ivan IV. The government of Fyodor Ivanovich (1584-1598) and Boris Godunov (1598-1605) also adhered to the course of enslaving the peasants. It is even possible that around 1592-1593. a decree was issued that forever banned the peasant "exit" throughout the country. If the government of Godunov in 1601-1602. during the famine and allowed the passage of certain categories of peasants, they were of a temporary, situational nature. In 1597, a law was passed that established a five-year limitation period for the investigation of peasants (lesson years). At the same time, government power proceeded primarily from its own interests, trying to prevent the progressive desolation of the central districts. Until the beginning of the 17th century. the state considered the contractual relations between landowners and peasants as their private affair: fugitives were persecuted only on the claims of landowners.

4. Ultimately, the oprichnina inevitably degenerated into a senseless war between Ivan the Terrible and his people. Oprichnina, splitting the nobility, contributed to the maturation of the prerequisites for the first civil war(from the turmoil) in Russia at the end of the 16th - beginning of the 17th centuries.

Ivan the Terrible died on March 18, 1584. Of the children of Anastasia, John and Fedor reached the age of majority: during the Livonian War in 1581, the tsar once became angry with his eldest son Ivan for a contradiction and so carelessly hit him with his iron crutch that the prince died a few days later . The heir to the throne was his second son Theodore, weak, sickly, weak-minded. Together with his eldest son Ivan, who died at the hands of his father, his hope for a worthy successor perished. Ivan the Terrible appointed Fedor to help the regency council to govern the country, where the leading role belonged to the tsar's brother-in-law Boris Godunov. Boris Fedorovich Godunov is an intelligent, capable, energetic and ambitious boyar. Under Ivan the Terrible, he strengthened his position by marrying the daughter of his beloved guardsman Malyuta Skuratov-Belsky, and then Tsarevich Fedor married his sister Irina, and Boris thus became a person close to the royal family. Having overcome the resistance of the old nobility, Godunov becomes the ruler of the state under Tsar Fedor.

A dynastic dispute arose immediately after the death of Ivan the Terrible. Tsarevich Dmitry was the youngest and last son of Ivan IV from the eighth (and fifth “married”) wife Maria Nagoya.

After the death of Ivan the Terrible, the young Dmitry (1882), with his mother and uncles, was sent to Uglich, allocated to the tsarevich. On May 15, 1591, Dmitry was killed under mysterious circumstances. The dynastic dispute that arose with the murder of Dmitry was removed from the agenda.

Popular performances showed that the country needs reforms to strengthen statehood and centralize power. Ivan IV embarked on the path of structural reforms.

The nobility expressed particular interest in carrying out reforms. A talented publicist of that time, nobleman Ivan Semenovich Peresvetov, was his peculiar ideologist. Based on the interests of the nobility, I.S. Peresvetov sharply condemned the boyars' arbitrariness. He saw the ideal state system in a strong royal power, based on the nobility. "A state without a thunderstorm is like a horse without a bridle," I.S. Peresvetov.

Chosen council. Around 1549, a council of people close to him formed around the young Ivan G., called the Chosen Rada. Representatives of various strata of the ruling class participated in the work of the Chosen Council. Princes D. Kurlyatev, A. Kurbsky, M. Vorotynsky, Metropolitan Macarius of Moscow and priest of the Kremlin's Annunciation Cathedral (the home church of the Moscow tsars), confessor of the Tsar Sylvester, clerk of the Ambassadorial Department I. Viskovaty. The composition of the Chosen Rada, as it were, reflected a compromise between the various strata of the ruling class. The elected council existed until 1560; she carried out transformations that were called the reforms of the middle of the 16th century.

Political system. In January 1547, Ivan IV, having reached the age of majority, was officially married to the kingdom. The ceremony of taking the royal title took place in the Assumption Cathedral of the Kremlin. From the hands of the Moscow Metropolitan Macarius, who developed the ritual of crowning the king, Ivan IV received the Monomakh's hat and other signs of royal power. From now on, the Grand Duke of Moscow began to be called the king.

During the period when a centralized state was taking shape, as well as during interregnums and internal strife, the Boyar Duma played the role of a legislative and advisory body under the Grand Duke, and later under the Tsar. During the reign of Ivan IV, the composition of the Boyar Duma was almost tripled in order to weaken the role of the old boyar aristocracy in it.

There was a new body of power Zemsky Sobor. Zemsky Sobors met irregularly and dealt with the most important state affairs, primarily foreign policy and finance. During the period of interregnums, new tsars were elected at Zemsky Sobors. According to experts, more than 50 Zemsky Sobors took place; The last Zemsky Sobors met in Russia in the 80s of the 17th century. They included the Boyar Duma. Consecrated Cathedral representatives of the higher clergy; the meetings of the Zemsky Sobors were also attended by representatives of the nobility and the top tenants. The first Zemsky Sobor was convened in 1549. He decided to draw up a new Code of Laws (approved in 1550) and outlined a program of reforms.

Even before the reforms of the middle of the XVI century. individual branches of state administration, as well as the administration of individual territories, began to be entrusted ("ordered", as they said then) to the boyars. This is how the first orders of the institution appeared, which were in charge of the branches of government or individual regions of the country. In the middle of the XVI century. there were already two dozen orders. Military affairs were led by the Discharge Order (in charge of the local army). Pushkarsky (artillery), Streletsky (archers). Armory (Arsenal). Foreign affairs were managed by the Ambassadorial order, finances by the order of the Grand Parish; state lands handed out to the nobles, Local order, slaves Kholopy order. There were orders that were in charge of certain territories, for example, the order of the Siberian Palace ruled Siberia, the order of the Kazan Palace controlled the annexed Kazan Khanate.

At the head of the order was a boyar or clerk, a major state official. Orders were in charge of administration, tax collection and court. With the increasing complexity of the tasks of public administration, the number of orders grew. By the time of Peter's reforms at the beginning of the 18th century. there were about 50 of them. The design of the order system made it possible to centralize the administration of the country.

A unified local management system began to take shape. Previously, the collection of taxes there was entrusted to the boyars-feeders, they were the actual rulers of individual lands. All the funds collected in excess of the Necessary taxes to the treasury, i.e., were at their personal disposal. they "feed" by managing the lands. In 1556 feedings were cancelled. In the localities, management (investigation and court on especially important state cases) was transferred into the hands of labial elders (district lip), elected from local nobles, zemstvo elders from among the wealthy strata of the black-haired population where there was no noble land ownership, city clerks or favorite heads in cities. Thus, in the middle of the XVI century. the apparatus of state power was formed in the form of a class-representative monarchy.

The Sudebnik of 1550. The general trend towards the centralization of the country necessitated the publication of a new code of laws of the Sudebnik of 1550. Taking the Sudebnik of Ivan III as a basis, the compilers of the new Sudebnik made changes to it related to the strengthening of central power. It confirmed the right of the peasants to move on St. George's Day and the payment for the "elderly" was increased. The feudal lord was now responsible for the crimes of the peasants, which increased their personal dependence on the master. For the first time, punishment for bribery of civil servants was introduced.

Even under Elena Glinskaya, a monetary reform was launched, according to which the Moscow ruble became the main monetary unit of the country. The right to collect trade duties passed into the hands of the state. The population of the country was obliged to bear the tax, a complex of in-kind and monetary duties. In the middle of the XVI century. A single unit of taxation for the entire state was established - a large plow. Depending on the fertility of the soil, as well as the social status of the owner of the land, the plow was 400-600 acres of land.

military reform. The core of the army was the noble militia. Near Moscow, a "chosen thousand" of 1070 provincial nobles was planted on the ground, who, according to the tsar's plan, were to become his support. For the first time, the Code of Service was drawn up. An votchinnik or landowner could start service from the age of 15 and pass it on by inheritance. From 150 acres of land, both the boyar and the nobleman had to put up one warrior and appear at the “horse, crowd and weapons” reviews.

Stoglav Cathedral. In 1551, on the initiative of the tsar and the metropolitan, a Council of the Russian Church was convened, which received the name Stoglavy, since its decisions were formulated in one hundred chapters. The decisions of church hierarchs reflected the changes associated with the centralization of the state. The council approved the adoption of the Sudebnik of 1550 and the reforms of Ivan IV. From among the local saints revered in individual Russian lands, an all-Russian list was compiled.

Ritualism was streamlined and unified throughout the country. Even art was subject to regulation: it was ordered to create new works, following the approved patterns. It was decided to leave in the hands of the church all the lands acquired by it before the Stoglavy Cathedral. In the future, churchmen could buy land and receive it as a gift only with the royal permission. Thus, in the issue of monastic land ownership, a line was established for its restriction and control by the king.

Reforms of the 50s of the XVI century. contributed to the strengthening of the Russian centralized multinational state. They strengthened the power of the king, led to the reorganization of local and central government, and strengthened the military power of the country3.

Around 1549, a government circle was formed around Tsar Ivan IV (the Terrible). He went down in history as Elected Rada. It was a kind of (unofficial) government under the leadership of Alexei Fedorovich Adashev. He himself was from the Kostroma nobles, and in Moscow he had noble relatives. The Elected Rada included: the priest of the court of the Annunciation Cathedral Sylvester, Metropolitan of Moscow and All Russia Macarius, Prince Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbsky, the head of the Ambassadorial Department Viskovaty Ivan Mikhailovich and others.

The unrest of 1547, known as the Moscow uprising, served as a prerequisite for the creation of an unofficial government. Ivan IV at that time was only 17 years old. The reason for the uprising was the aggravation of social contradictions in the 30-40s. At this time, the arbitrariness of the boyars was very clearly manifested in connection with the infancy of Ivan IV. The tone was set by the princes Glinsky, since the mother of the crowned boy was Elena Vasilievna Glinskaya.

Dissatisfaction with taxes, which were unbearable, grew among the broad masses of the people. The impetus for the uprising was a fire in Moscow at the end of the second decade of June. In terms of its size, it was huge and caused irreparable damage to the well-being of Muscovites. Embittered people who lost all their property took to the streets of the capital on June 21, 1547.

Rumors spread among the rebels that the Glinsky princes had set fire to the city. Allegedly, their wives cut out the hearts of the dead, dried them, pounded them, and sprinkled houses and fences with the resulting powder. After that, magic spells were cast, and the powder flared up. So they set fire to Moscow buildings in which ordinary people lived.

The angry crowd tore to pieces all the princes of Glinsky, who fell under the arm. Their estates, which survived the fire, were looted and burned. The indignant people began to look for the young tsar, but he left Moscow and took refuge in the village of Vorobyovo ( Sparrow Hills, during the years of Soviet power were called the Lenin Hills). A huge mass of people went to the village and on June 29 surrounded it.

The emperor went out to the people. He was calm and confident. After much persuasion and promises, he managed to persuade the people to calm down and disperse. People believed the young king. Their indignant fervor faded away. The crowd moved to the ashes in order to somehow begin to equip their life.

Meanwhile, on the orders of Ivan IV, troops were drawn to Moscow. The instigators of the uprising began to be seized. Many of them were executed. Some managed to escape from the capital. But the power of the Glinskys was irrevocably undermined. The situation was aggravated by unrest in other Russian cities. All this made it clear to the king that the existing state system was ineffective. That is why he gathered progressive-minded people around him. Life itself and the instinct of self-preservation made him do it. Thus, in 1549, the Elected Rada began its work on reforming the state system in the Muscovite kingdom.

Reforms of the Elected Rada

The unofficial government ruled the state on behalf of the king, so his decisions were equated with the royal will. Already in 1550, military reform began to be carried out. Streltsy troops began to form. It was the guard, whose task was to protect the sovereign. By analogy, archers can be compared with the royal musketeers of France. At first, there were only 3,000 of them. Over time, archers became much more. And the end of such military units was put by Peter I in 1698. So they lasted almost 150 years.

Order was restored in military service. In total, two categories of service people stood out. The first category included boyars and nobles. Only a born boy was immediately recorded on military service. And he became fit for it when he reached the age of 15 years. That is, all people of noble birth had to serve in the army or in some other public service. Otherwise, they were considered "undersized", regardless of age. Such a nickname was shameful, so everyone served.

The other category was the commoners. These are archers, Cossacks, artisans associated with the manufacture of weapons. Such people were called recruited "according to the instrument" or recruited. But the military of those years had nothing to do with the current military. They did not live in the barracks, but they were allocated plots of land and private houses. Entire military settlements were formed. In them, the soldiers lived an ordinary measured life. They sowed, plowed, harvested, married and raised children. In the event of war, the entire male population became under arms.

Foreigners also served in the Russian army. They were mercenaries, and their number never exceeded a couple of thousand people.

The entire vertical of power was subjected to serious reform. Established tight control over local government. It was not the population but the state that supported it. A single state duty was introduced. Now only the state took it. For landowners, a single tax per unit area was established.

The unofficial government also carried out judicial reform. In 1550, a new Code of Laws was published - a collection of legislative acts. He settled monetary and in-kind fees from peasants and artisans. Tougher penalties for robbery, robbery and other criminal offenses. Introduced several harsh articles on punishment for bribes.

The elected Rada paid great attention to personnel policy. The so-called Yard notebook was created. It was a list of sovereign people who could be appointed to various high positions: diplomatic, military, administrative. That is, a person fell into the "clip" and could move from one high post to another, bringing benefits to the state everywhere. Subsequently, this style of work was copied by the communists and created a party nomenklatura.

The central state apparatus was significantly improved. There were many new orders (ministries and departments, if translated into modern language), since the functions of local government were transferred to officials of the central apparatus. In addition to national orders, there were also regional ones. That is, they supervised certain territories and were responsible for them.

The clerk was at the head of the order. He was appointed not from the boyars, but from literate and unborn service people. This was done specifically in order to oppose the state apparatus of the boyar power and its influence. That is, the orders served the king, and not the noble nobility, which had its own interests, sometimes at odds with the state.

In foreign policy, the Chosen Rada was oriented primarily to the east. The Khanate of Astrakhan and Kazan were annexed to the Moscow kingdom. In the west, the Baltic states fell into the zone of state interests. On January 17, 1558, the Livonian War began. Some members of the unofficial government opposed it. The war dragged on for a long 25 years and caused a severe economic crisis (1570-1580), called Poruhi.

In 1560, the unofficial government ordered to live long. The reason was the disagreement between Ivan the Terrible and the reformers. They accumulated for a long time, and their source lay in the exorbitant lust for power and ambitions of the Moscow Tsar. The autocrat began to be burdened by the presence next to him of people who had independent and independent views.

While the royal power was weak, Ivan the Terrible tolerated the reformers and obeyed them in everything. But, thanks to competent transformations, the central apparatus was greatly strengthened. The tsar rose above the boyars and became a real autocrat. Adashev and other reformers began to interfere with him.

The reforms of the Chosen Rada did their job - it was no longer needed. The king began to look for a reason to alienate his former friends and devoted assistants. The relations of Sylvester and Adashev with the closest relatives of the first and beloved royal wife, Anastasia Zakharova-Yuryeva, were tense. When the tsarina died, Ivan IV accused the former favorites of a disdainful attitude towards the "junitsa".

Foreign policy differences, exacerbated by the Livonian War, added fuel to the fire. But the most serious were internal political conflicts. The Elected Rada carried out very deep reforms, designed for decades. The king wanted immediate results. But the state apparatus was still poorly developed and did not know how to work quickly and efficiently.

At this stage historical development all the shortcomings and shortcomings of the central government could only be "corrected" by terror. The king went this way, and the reforms of the Chosen Rada began to seem to him backward and ineffective.

In 1560, Sylvester was exiled to the Solovetsky Monastery. Adashev and his brother Danila went to Livonia as governors by royal decree. Soon they were arrested. Adashev died in prison, and Danila was executed. In 1564, Prince Kurbsky, who led the troops in Livonia, fled to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. He was on friendly terms with Adashev and understood that disgrace and execution awaited him.

The fall of the Chosen Rada was the beginning of one of the most terrible periods of Russian history - oprichnina. The events of the first half of the 60s became its prehistory.

Embittered people who lost all their property took to the streets of the capital on June 21, 1547.

The angry crowd tore to pieces all the princes of Glinsky, who fell under the arm. Their estates, which survived the fire, were looted and burned.

The indignant people began to look for the young tsar, but he left Moscow and took refuge in the village of Vorobyovo (Vorobyovy Gory, during the years of Soviet power were called Leninskiye Gory). A huge mass of people went to the village and on June 29 surrounded it.

The emperor went out to the people. According to available evidence, he behaved calmly and confidently. After much persuasion and promises, he managed to persuade the people to calm down and disperse. People believed the young king. Their indignant fervor faded away. The crowd moved to the ashes in order to somehow begin to equip their life.

The first steps towards reforms were expressed in the convocation on February 27, 1549. extended meeting, which was attended by the Boyar Duma, the Consecrated Cathedral, governors, as well as boyar children and "big" nobles (obviously, Moscow). February meeting of 1549. ("The Cathedral of Reconciliation") was actually the first Zemsky Sobor.

Its convocation marked the transformation of the Russian state into a class-representative monarchy, the creation of a central class-representative institution. It was extremely important that the most important state events begin to be taken with the sanction of representatives of the ruling class, among which the nobles played a significant role.

Solution Zemsky Cathedral showed that the government was going to continue to use the support of both the boyars and the nobility. It was clearly not in favor of the feudal aristocracy, since it had to give up a number of its privileges in favor of the bulk of the service people. The abolition of the jurisdiction of the nobles (hereinafter the Sudebnik of 1550) meant the gradual formalization of the class privileges of the nobility.

Due to the fact that in February 1549. it was decided to “give judgment” if a person applied with a petition to the boyars, treasurers and butlers, a special petition hut was created, which was in charge of A. Adashev and, possibly, Sylvester.

The author of the Piskarevsky Chronicler gives the location of this "hut" at the Annunciation in the Kremlin . But in reality, the location of the petition hut is not entirely clear: near the Annunciation there was a treasury room. Not being formally a treasurer, A. Adashev in the 50s of the 16th century actually headed the activities of the state treasury .

But, in any case, the connection between the appearance of the petition hut and the reforms of the middle of the century is undeniable. Petitions addressed to the sovereign were sent to the Petition Izba, here decisions were made on them - the Petition Izba was a kind of supreme appellate agency and control body that oversaw another government agency. Simultaneously with the “Council of Reconciliation”, meetings of the church council also took place, which established the church celebration of 16 more “saints” and examined the lives of these “wonderworkers”.

In the context of the growth of the reform movement, the church sought to strengthen its falling authority by canonizing its prominent figures. After the February councils, government activity in 1549. unfolded in various areas. Growth popular movements in the city and the countryside forced to resume the implementation of the lip reform, after the triumph of the Shuiskys in 1542. September 27, 1549 A lip order was issued to the peasants of the Kirillov Monastery.

This order testified to the growth of the influence of the nobility. Now labial affairs were transferred to the jurisdiction of elected labial elders from among the children of the boyars.

The formation of various huts took place according to a functional difference, and not according to a territorial one.

This testified to the significant success of the centralization of control.

1549 was a year of active attack on the immune privileges of spiritual feudal lords . June 4, 1549 a letter was sent to Dmitrov, according to which a number of monasteries were deprived of the right to duty-free trade in Dmitrov and other cities. But the large monasteries retained their privileges.

By the end of 1549 more and more insistent voices began to be heard pushing the government to reform. Yermolai-Erasmus submitted his project to the Tsar, suggesting, at the cost of some concessions, to prevent the possibility of new unrest. He began measures to unify the system of land taxation, to provide service people with land.

The projects of I.S. Peresvetov, a defender of strong autocratic power. The centralization of the court and finances, the codification of laws, the creation of a permanent army, provided with a salary - these are some of the proposals of this "warrior" - a publicist who expressed the thoughts and aspirations of the advanced part of the nobility affected by the reformation-humanist movement.

Initially, in royal matters, the task was to issue laws that were supposed to restore the order that existed under Ivan III and Vasily III.

The reference to “father” and “grandfather” found in the legislation meant that “they tried to give the reforms the appearance of measures aimed at those abuses of power by the boyars with which the minor years of Ivan IV were “filled” ” .

After the statement about the abolition of localism, the draft outlined a number of considerations about the need to restore order in patrimonial and local law. According to the author of the project, it was necessary to check land holdings (estates, estates) and feeding in order to find out the size of possessions and the performance of military duties by service people. It was necessary to redistribute the available service fund in order to provide for land-poor and landless feudal lords.

But this project violated the original patrimonial rights of the feudal aristocracy, so the project was not implemented .

Financial reforms include the elimination of travel fees (myta) within countries.

Customs partitions between the individual lands of the Russian state, reflecting the incompleteness of the process of getting rid of economic fragmentation, hindered the further development of commodity-money relations.

If we sum up the consideration of the royal "issues" in the composition of the Elected Rada, then we can state the far-reaching intentions of the government to satisfy the land requirements of the nobles at the expense of boyar land ownership, to strengthen the army and state finances.

The composition of the "Chosen Rada" is the subject of discussion . Definitely, the priest of the Kremlin's Annunciation Cathedral, the tsar's confessor Sylvester and a young figure from a not very noble family A.F. Adashev, Metropolitan Macarius, clerk Viskovaty and others participated in the Rada. The full composition of this unofficial government is unknown.

On the other hand, some historians deny the existence of the Chosen Rada as an institution. For example. K.N. Bestuzhev-Ryumin talks about it like this: “everything that was done in this era is attributed to the “chosen council” (i.e., the closest advisers to the tsar); they say that this council was elected by Sylvester and Adashev. It is unlikely, however, that any advisers could do much without completely convincing the king of the need for changes in the existing system. I.'s exaggerated, in anger, testimony that the advisers did not allow him to step freely, testifies only to how far Sylvester extended his claims, how much the tsar was irritated against him and his supporters; but one should not think that these words were completely true. . Thus, the historian denies the very need for Rage and denies that she could lead some kind of separate from IvanIVpolitics.

R. Skrynnikov partly agrees with him, arguing that “the traditional interpretation of Kurbsky's text boils down to the fact that after the Moscow fire of 1547, Sylvester and Adashev came to power. They drove away the “petters” from the king and formed the government of the Chosen One, which carried out reforms. This interpretation is inconsistent with the facts. In the story about the Rada, the names of the "petters" are not named. But from the further narration it follows that Kurbsky considered the “shuryas” of the sovereign Zakharyins to be the main “petters”. He called them the wicked destroyers of the entire Holy Russian kingdom, noting at the same time that above he “many times” (he spoke many times) about them .... The history of the Rada cannot be connected either with the fire of 1547 or with the removal of the "petters". The Zakharins not only did not lose their influence after the fire, but, on the contrary, came into power. There was no question of any replacement of "caresses" with wise men - a rada. We have to admit that Kurbsky's muddled story can only give a wrong idea of the government of reforms in the middle of the 16th century .... " .

Thus, the researcher does not consider the Rada to be a real institution. However, he is convinced of the reality of the so-called. The Near Duma - “Unlike the Elected Rada, the Near Duma was a real institution that operated for many years. To solve current affairs, the authorities gathered a few "near people" who had a direct bearing on the agenda. In a critical situation, the Middle Duma was assembled in full strength"