How do you understand and feel the strength of your Core Personality on a scale from 0 to +10?
Where 0 is “I just go with the flow”, and +10 is “I create my own Reality 100%!”

What is the practical significance of the seminar?

1) You will calculate your Destiny Code and find out the sign of the Core of your personality, by meditating on the image of which you will strengthen your understanding of yourself and strengthen your Core Personality

2) You will receive a vivid image of your personality, which, when working with it, will give you a deep understanding of the ESSENCE of your Core Personality - and understanding yourself is the most important step towards modeling your Reality

3) You do not need to spend years of your life studying the art of Bazi Xuanming, passing a bunch of tests, or years of introspection and soul-searching to determine your Strengths and Weaknesses.

4) In just a few hours you will recognize your Strengths and Weaknesses of your Core Personality, which you can then begin to strengthen by changing your real life in all areas - creative, financial, career, social or resource.

5) You will gain an understanding of how you can quickly and effectively strengthen your Core Personality - which will give you the opportunity to quickly improve your self-confidence.

6) You will receive one individual technique for the rapid self-development of your Core Personality - this is for those who have long been looking for practices for self-realization and could not choose the right one - now you will have it!

7) You will be able to use this information to understand people and create your environment, which will strengthen you, as you will receive express knowledge about all 10 Cores of Personality.

SpoilerTarget"> Spoiler: Read more

What exactly is inside the seminar?

It consists of the following 12 lessons:

Introduction: The concept of the human energy-information matrix and its main program - the core of human personality

Block 1: Calculating your Destiny Code and determining the Core of your Personality.

Block 2: 10 stages of evolution of the personality core

Block 3: 10 Lessons, with a description of each of the 10 Cores of Personality

Conclusion: How to use information about your Core personality as effectively as possible to find what you love, build a career, improve relationships with the outside world and improve your financial condition.

The most interesting, valuable, useful and practically applicable information is contained in Block 3. Its content consists of five aspects.

SpoilerTarget"> Spoiler: The structure of each lesson:

Each lesson consists of five important parts that describe certain features of each of the 10 Cores of Personality.

Part 1. The image of the Core of personality and its deep essence - here I describe all 10 Personality types and give images that can be worked with at different levels.

Part 2. Fundamental programs embedded in the essence of the Core of personality, for development and elaboration in the current incarnation - these are qualities, strengths and weaknesses, working with which gradually increases your personality strength

Part 3. One of the three main pillars of personality strength - each personality has, in addition to different programs, also main supporting programs. If you strengthen them, then the power of personality grows VERY quickly. And vice versa - if they are destroyed by circumstances or unkind people - then your personality can easily be weakened or destroyed. These are deep values ​​that must be protected at all costs.

Part 4. A method for quickly and effectively pumping up personality power - there are chips for accelerating pumping up personality power, based on the characteristics of a particular Personality Core - here I’m talking about one of these chips.

Part 5. One of the most effective techniques for self-improvement, taking into account a deep understanding of the Core of personality - similarly, I give one technique for rapid self-improvement, based on the individual characteristics of the programs embedded in you

.

A spiritual seeker may hesitate and doubt for some time, but sometimes a moment comes when he gains confidence in himself and begins to feel that he knows what he wants and that today he has achieved a lot. His self-esteem reaches its highest level and is fixed at this level for a long time. It may take great upheaval and even suffering to bring her back to real compliance. The spiritual seeker feels his superiority not only over ordinary people, but also over other seekers. A kind of crystallization of personality occurs in him, a hardening of character, which does not always play a positive role for his further evolution.

There are several reasons for this crystallization. First of all, this is an increased emotional conviction that one is right. A person suddenly realizes his own exclusivity. Conviction, coupled with a sense of exclusivity, gives him inner comfort and protects him from problems. It instills in him psychological immobility, an unwillingness to change himself and to evaluate at least some of his own traits and properties critically. The rigid, immobile core of the personality categorically does not want change and rejects in advance all negative information about itself, no matter whether it comes from other people or is the result of one’s own thoughts. “Stubbornness” multiplied by laziness leads to very serious consequences: the spiritual seeker becomes dogmatic, incapable of development and renewal. Every day he lives as if a carbon copy of the previous one, without making any internal discoveries and without trying to break out of the routine of routine and the swamp of everyday life. Quite often he becomes a boring, annoying creature, completely uninteresting to other people, and yet willing to be taught and inclined to give advice that no one asks him for. People get tired of such crystallized spiritual seekers and quickly become disillusioned with them.

But the most unfortunate thing in the life of a person who is too rigid in his approach to life occurs if he is, in one form or another, engaged in the practical development of his psychoenergetic potential. All his shortcomings are fueled by accumulated energy and harden, like low-quality stones that have been cut. If at the stage of a stubborn and mistake-making neophyte-dogmatist his personality, which has stopped in development, still has a chance of transformation, then in the future the awakened energy will finally crystallize the personal structure. Energy, like a liquid, rushes to a vessel that has a curved shape, fills it, and then freezes, like ice, which can no longer be melted. Not only does the once active, energetic seeker of perfection become a narcissistic and self-satisfied fanatic, who, instead of devoting his main energy to improving himself and abandoning negative traits, directs all his strength to fueling a sense of self-importance and the moral and psychological destruction of those people who do not correspond to his ideals and ideas. Incorrectly accumulated energy increases in him inertia, laziness, a feeling of psychological heaviness and reluctance to change anything in himself and in life. Energy performs at least two functions in this case - the function of yeast, on which human shortcomings begin to rapidly grow and become fat, and the function of glue, leading to their strengthening and hardening. The aura of such a seeker becomes dense and opaque, which is perceived by other people as a manifestation of rigidity and closedness. And in fact, it becomes closed, not only for people, but also for psychoenergetic exchange with the Cosmos and God. In particular, it is impervious to any negative information about the seeker himself, who loses feedback from the world. As a result, the living soul of an important and self-affirmed seeker of perfection becomes dead and stops developing.

Reality training

WHO AM I? or CORE PERSONALITY

Increase the effectiveness of your actions by 300% in 30 days using your own value system and change the quality of the material sphere of life.

The question “Who am I” has worried people at all times. By answering it and incorporating knowledge about yourself into every part of your life, you will change it radically.

We are parents and children and workers and bosses, we are wives and husbands, cooks and artists. We build a business, wash dishes, walk, read and do a hundred other activities in the material world, but the question is how do we do it?

At the reality training Who Am I or the Core of Personality, we will increase the share of the presence of the true essence and introduce your value system into actions in the material world.

IMPORTANT!

• – There are no analogues to this training. Perhaps only “Magic cleaning of thoughts”, but it very easily concerns efficiency.
• – This training is 10 times cooler than anything you’ve seen with us, because we will work closely for 30 days, shoulder to shoulder.
• – There will be a lot of remote work and you will need to work hard.

THIS IS FOR YOU IF:

• You are already acting for yourself and your dreams, coming up with and implementing ideas, but you want more.
• The training is suitable for you if you are in the mood to work.
• You are ready to be honest with yourself and take responsibility for your life.
• You need a detailed, well-developed plan-system.
• You want to improve the efficiency of your actions by 300%.
• Do you want to stand on two legs - spiritual and material?

THIS IS NOT FOR YOU AT ALL IF:

• You have not yet begun to act, but are only dreaming.
• You are just thinking about starting and you have no results in the physical world.
• You are not ready to work for yourself.
• You don't believe in your strengths and capabilities.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Hello, friends!
Our names are Grigory and Elena Bolgov.

One day we wanted to live differently from how we always lived. Live in ease, in joy, in Love. Our sincere desire and honesty (sometimes to the point of cruelty) before each other and ourselves led us to knowledge of the Truth. To the very truth that lives inside each of us. We were lucky enough to collect and structure knowledge into a method that we called “Technology of Imaginative Creation”. With the help of technology, we have changed our lives in the most incredible way and want to tell you about the real you! Show you the light and love that is hidden in the very depths of your being!

• We are the authors of the Technology of Imaginative Creation method
• Organizers of the project “Acquiring Mastery”
• Experts in creating programs to improve the quality of life and move to a new level of awareness
• Happy life explorers
• We learned from our world, so we are for lightness and simplicity!

HOW THE PROCESS WILL GO:

30 days – Four weeks. Four modules. Closed site. Closed Facebook group.

Module one. First week:

• – Determining WHO I AM
• – What I WANT
• – Defining a VALUES SYSTEM
• – We work with the BODY – relieving deep tension
• – Select the main areas of strengthening and WORK with them

Module two. Second week:

• – We identify FEARS that prevent you from creating the life of your dreams
• - What I can
• – Freeing the CORE OF PERSONALITY
• – We work with the BODY

Module three. Third week:

• – Determine RESOURCES
• – Focusing – HOW I WANT TO LIVE
• – Flexibility of thinking
• – We work with the BODY
• – WORKING with enhancement spheres

Module four. Fourth week:

• – We show ENERGY in the material world.
• – Focusing energy in the MOMENT now
• – We work with the BODY
• – WORKING with enhancement spheres
• – Building a BALANCE between tension and relaxation

A clear understanding of your strengths, total attention and the revealed energy of the core of your personality will become your new strong habit, and the material world will become a clear and pleasant place for you to live.

AT THE RESULT OF FOUR WEEKS:

• – You will stop being scattered in one hundred and five directions, trying to be in time everywhere
• – Incorporate your values ​​into your projects, making them much more powerful
• – Improve your efficiency
• – Relax your body and improve your health
• – Strengthen results in the material areas of life – finances, relationships, creativity

REVIEWS ABOUT THE TOT METHOD

• Thank you guys for these small but very VALUE tips! Having completed the first level of training and

Having attended several of your webinars, in this lesson I learned new information for every day!

After all, it’s so great to own the tools that you give, you yourself

used it and reached this level! I will definitely use it!

Special thanks to Grisha for the availability of materials!…

Tatiana Fakhuri

• Thank you, Grisha and Elenochka, for this lesson! It is very relevant. Right now I'm working

with self-acceptance, but it hasn’t worked out yet. I hope this course will help me do this.

Much of what you say resonated in the Soul. I cried half the time the video was on.

During self-love practices, tears always flow. I want to move on

and for this you need to accept and love yourself. In meditation I saw myself in the image

a glowing girl with wings (like an Angel, probably). And I was able to feel the energy throughout my body.

But my knees felt as if they were breaking out when the energy flowed. Strong currents for me.

Thank you again!

• Good night my dear family people. I listened to course 3 and did meditations.

After the first course, I sold the garage, although I no longer hoped. I immediately realized that I was not ready for

large sums, but thanks to you, I managed to cope with fear. I think I could.

The fear of loss and the fear of being left without money is too deep in me, but I can handle it, I’m sure of it.

I began to notice even more how beautiful and perfect everything around me was. Everything worked out from the first lesson.

The second one is a little tight, but I’ll come back to it. The third one is wonderful – the meditation is super!

THANK YOU FOR BEING IN MY LIFE!

• Grisha, Lena! What simple and useful tips and exercises!!! Simply lovely!!! Thank you!

I look at you and my Soul rejoices, you evoke such warmth inside!

• I am now practicing being in the moment. Yesterday I listened to it for the first time - I was in a bad mood,

I’m not in touch with myself – I noted several valuable thoughts and I think: “I feel that there is still a lot for me.”

Need one more time. I especially liked the idea that every moment I am already different - it gives

the opportunity to unhook from the old and change (finally :)). And one more thing about the fact that, taking

decisions, you need to ask yourself: “Do I love myself?” Today I listened to it again -

already in the right condition. I tell myself: “This is Lena and Grisha, they know what they are talking about.

Listen carefully". I listened for 3 hours - such a flow of awareness and rethinking opened up in

towards self-acceptance. Thank you)

• It seems to me that what has been said here is exactly what everyone needs to hear and realize!

This does not coincide with collective attitudes, but it is so true!!! And it works!!!

• Thank you very much for the advice and meditations! You helped me a lot! I too just recently

It is very difficult to change your thoughts. I annoyed all my loved ones with my whining. To be honest I already

I almost gave up when I saw your mini course. But after meditating on self-love, think

It has become much easier to think about the good and not think about the bad! Sometimes when it appears in my head

any negative thought, I just tell it the magic word “go away” and it disappears!

By the way, at the end of the dive, I first saw how “I” the mother hugged “herself” as a child.

Yes, this touching image, for some reason, made me unhappy, helpless and depressed

whiner...And after I asked for the original image of self-love, I saw how I

hug all sorts of options for me: Men, women, children, adults... It was about

weeks ago and I'm still in the holiday mood most of the time! But with money

it turned out a little more complicated. I think I did this meditation five times and all the time

at the end I saw something incomprehensible. The vision kept repeating in which I was eating a large yellow

a fruit similar to a hybrid of a melon and a peach. It tastes like water with honey. I am nowhere in the material world

I have never seen such a fruit. In the last vision, I bought it for large gold coins. But the money is in

This month I actually have more.

YOUR FUTURE DEPENDS ONLY ON YOU!

Total presence in the moment and bringing the true essence into action is the main secret of super-success in any area of ​​life!

What is Consciousness?

First, about what Consciousness is in general. People have thought about this question throughout the history of mankind, but still cannot come to a final decision. We know only some of the properties and possibilities of consciousness. Consciousness is awareness of oneself, one’s personality, it is a great analyzer of all our feelings, emotions, desires, plans. Consciousness is what sets us apart, what makes us feel that we are not objects, but individuals. In other words, Consciousness miraculously reveals our fundamental existence. Consciousness is our awareness of our “I”, but at the same time Consciousness is a great mystery. Consciousness has no dimensions, no form, no color, no smell, no taste; it cannot be touched or turned in your hands. Even though we know very little about consciousness, we know with absolute certainty that we have it.

One of the main questions of humanity is the question of the nature of this very Consciousness (soul, “I”, ego). Materialism and idealism have diametrically opposed views on this issue. From the point of view of materialism, human Consciousness is the substrate of the brain, a product of matter, a product of biochemical processes, a special fusion of nerve cells. From the point of view of idealism, Consciousness is the ego, “I”, spirit, soul - an immaterial, invisible, eternally existing, non-dying energy that spiritualizes the body. Acts of consciousness always involve a subject who is actually aware of everything.

If you are interested in purely religious ideas about the soul, then religion will not provide any evidence of the existence of the soul. The doctrine of the soul is a dogma and is not subject to scientific proof.

There are absolutely no explanations, much less evidence, from materialists who believe that they are impartial scientists (although this is far from the case).

But how do most people, who are equally far from religion, from philosophy, and from science too, imagine this Consciousness, soul, “I”? Let's ask ourselves, what is your “I”? Since I often ask this question in consultations, I can tell you how people usually answer it.

Gender, name, profession and other role functions

The first thing that comes to mind for most is: “I am a person”, “I am a woman (man)”, “I am a businessman (turner, baker)”, “I am Tanya (Katya, Alexey)”, “I am a wife ( husband, daughter)”, etc. These are certainly funny answers. Your individual, unique “I” cannot be defined in general terms. There are a huge number of people in the world with the same characteristics, but they are not your “I”. Half of them are women (men), but they are not “I” either, people with the same professions seem to have their own “I”, not yours, the same can be said about wives (husbands), people of different professions, social status, nationalities, religions, etc. No affiliation with any group will explain to you what your individual “I” represents, because Consciousness is always personal. I am not qualities, qualities only belong to our “I”, because the qualities of the same person can change, but his “I” will remain unchanged.

Mental and physiological characteristics

Some say that their “I” is their reflexes, their behavior, their individual ideas and preferences, their psychological characteristics, etc.

In fact, this cannot be the core of the personality, which is called “I.” Why? Because throughout life, behavior, ideas and preferences change, and even more so psychological characteristics. It cannot be said that if these features were different before, then it was not my “I”.

Realizing this, some people make the following argument: “I am my individual body.” This is already more interesting. Let's examine this assumption as well.

Everyone knows from the school anatomy course that the cells of our body are gradually renewed throughout life. Old ones die (apoptosis), and new ones are born. Some cells (the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract) are completely renewed almost every day, but there are cells that go through their life cycle much longer. On average, every 5 years all the cells of the body are renewed. If we consider the “I” to be a simple collection of human cells, then the result will be absurd. It turns out that if a person lives, for example, 70 years. During this time, at least 10 times a person will change all the cells in his body (i.e. 10 generations). Could this mean that not one person, but 10 different people lived their 70-year life? Isn't that pretty stupid? We conclude that “I” cannot be a body, because the body is not permanent, but “I” is permanent.

This means that the “I” cannot be either the qualities of cells or their totality.

But here the particularly erudite give a counter-argument: “Okay, with bones and muscles it’s clear, this really cannot be “I,” but there are nerve cells! And they are alone for the rest of their lives. Maybe “I” is the sum of nerve cells?”

Let's think about this question together...

Does consciousness consist of nerve cells?

Materialism is accustomed to decomposing the entire multidimensional world into mechanical components, “testing harmony with algebra” (A.S. Pushkin). The most naive misconception of militant materialism regarding personality is the idea that personality is a set of biological qualities. However, the combination of impersonal objects, be they even atoms or neurons, cannot give rise to a personality and its core - the “I”.

How can this most complex “I”, feeling, capable of experiences, love, be simply the sum of specific cells of the body along with the ongoing biochemical and bioelectric processes? How can these processes shape the “I”???

Provided that nerve cells constituted our “I”, then we would lose part of our “I” every day. With each dead cell, with each neuron, the “I” would become smaller and smaller. With cell restoration, it would increase in size.

Scientific studies conducted in different countries of the world prove that nerve cells, like all other cells of the human body, are capable of regeneration (restoration). Here is what the most serious biological international journal Nature writes: “Employees of the Californian Institute for Biological Research named after. Salk discovered that in the brains of adult mammals, fully functional young cells are born that function on a par with existing neurons. Professor Frederick Gage and his colleagues also concluded that brain tissue renews itself most rapidly in physically active animals." 1

This is confirmed by a publication in another biological journal - Science: “Over the past two years, researchers have found that nerve and brain cells are renewed, like others in the human body. The body is capable of repairing disorders related to the nervous tract itself, says scientist Helen M. Blon.”

Thus, even with a complete change of all (including nerve) cells of the body, the “I” of a person remains the same, therefore, it does not belong to the constantly changing material body.

For some reason, in our time it is so difficult to prove what was obvious and understandable to the ancients. The Roman Neoplatonist philosopher Plotinus, who lived in the 3rd century, wrote: “It is absurd to assume that since none of the parts has life, then life can be created by their totality... moreover, it is completely impossible for life to be produced by a heap of parts, and that the mind was generated by that which is devoid of mind. If anyone objects that this is not so, but that in fact the soul is formed by atoms coming together, that is, bodies indivisible into parts, then he will be refuted by the fact that the atoms themselves only lie one next to the other, not forming a living whole, for unity and joint feeling cannot be obtained from bodies that are insensitive and incapable of unification; but the soul feels itself”2.

The “I” is the unchanging core of personality, which includes many variables, but is not itself variable.

A skeptic can put forward a last desperate argument: “Maybe “I” is the brain?”

Is Consciousness a product of brain activity? What does science say?

Many people heard the fairy tale that our Consciousness is the activity of the brain back in school. The idea that the brain is essentially a person with his “I” is extremely widespread. Most people think that it is the brain that perceives information from the world around us, processes it and decides how to act in each specific case; they think that it is the brain that makes us alive and gives us personality. And the body is nothing more than a spacesuit that ensures the activity of the central nervous system.

But this tale has nothing to do with science. The brain is currently being studied in depth. The chemical composition, parts of the brain, and the connections of these parts with human functions have been well studied for a long time. The brain organization of perception, attention, memory, and speech has been studied. Functional blocks of the brain have been studied. A huge number of clinics and research centers have been studying the human brain for more than a hundred years, for which expensive, effective equipment has been developed. But if you open any textbook, monograph, scientific journal on neurophysiology or neuropsychology, you will not find scientific data about the connection between the brain and Consciousness.

For people far from this area of ​​knowledge, this seems surprising. In fact, there is nothing surprising about this. It’s just that no one has ever discovered the connection between the brain and the very center of our personality, our “I”. Of course, material scientists have always wanted this. Thousands of studies have been conducted, millions of experiments have been conducted, billions of dollars have been spent. The efforts of scientists were not in vain. Parts of the brain were discovered and studied, their connection with physiological processes was established, much was done to understand many neurophysiological processes and phenomena, but the most important thing was not achieved. It was not possible to find the place in the brain that is our “I”. It was not possible even, despite extremely active work in this direction, to make a serious assumption about how the brain can be connected with our Consciousness.

Where did the assumption come from that Consciousness is in the brain? One of the first to make such an assumption was the greatest electrophysiologist Dubois-Reymond (1818-1896) in the mid-18th century. In his worldview, Dubois-Reymond was one of the brightest representatives of the mechanistic movement. In one of his letters to a friend, he wrote that “exclusively physicochemical laws operate in the body; if not everything can be explained with their help, then it is necessary, using physical and mathematical methods, either to find a way of their action, or to accept that there are new forces of matter, equal in value to physical and chemical forces” 3.

But another outstanding physiologist, Karl Friedrich Wilhelm Ludwig (Ludwig, 1816-1895), who lived at the same time with Reymon, who headed the new Physiological Institute in Leipzig in 1869-1895, which became the world's largest center in the field of experimental physiology, did not agree with him. The founder of the scientific school, Ludwig wrote that none of the existing theories of nervous activity, including the electrical theory of nerve currents by Dubois-Reymond, can say anything about how, as a result of the activity of nerves, acts of sensation become possible. Let us note that here we are not even talking about the most complex acts of consciousness, but about much simpler sensations. If there is no consciousness, then we cannot feel or experience anything.

Another major physiologist of the 19th century, the outstanding English neurophysiologist Sir Charles Scott Sherrington, Nobel Prize laureate, said that if it is not clear how the psyche arises from the activity of the brain, then, naturally, it is equally unclear how it can have any influence on the behavior of a living creature, which is controlled through the nervous system.

As a result, Dubois-Reymond himself came to the following conclusion: “As we are aware, we do not know and will never know. And no matter how much we delve into the jungle of intracerebral neurodynamics, we will not build a bridge to the kingdom of consciousness.” Raymon came to the conclusion, disappointing for determinism, that it is impossible to explain Consciousness by material causes. He admitted “that here the human mind comes across a “world riddle” that it will never be able to solve” 4.

Professor at Moscow University, philosopher A.I. Vvedensky in 1914 formulated the law of “the absence of objective signs of animation.” The meaning of this law is that the role of the psyche in the system of material processes of behavior regulation is absolutely elusive and there is no conceivable bridge between the activity of the brain and the area of ​​mental or spiritual phenomena, including Consciousness.

The leading experts in neurophysiology, Nobel Prize laureates David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel recognized that in order to establish a connection between the brain and Consciousness, it is necessary to understand what reads and decodes the information that comes from the senses. Scientists have recognized that this is impossible to do.

The great scientist, Moscow State University professor Nikolai Kobozev in his monograph showed that neither cells, nor molecules, nor even atoms can be responsible for the processes of thinking and memory5.

There is evidence of the absence of a connection between Consciousness and the functioning of the brain, which is understandable even to people far from science. Here it is.

Let us assume that the “I” (Consciousness) is the result of the work of the brain. As neurophysiologists know for sure, a person can live even with one hemisphere of the brain. Moreover, he has Consciousness. A person who lives only with the right hemisphere of the brain certainly has an “I” (Consciousness). Accordingly, we can conclude that the “I” is not in the left, absent, hemisphere. A person with only a functioning left hemisphere also has an “I”, therefore the “I” is not located in the right hemisphere, which is absent in this person. Consciousness remains regardless of which hemisphere is removed. This means that a person does not have an area of ​​the brain responsible for Consciousness, neither in the left nor in the right hemisphere of the brain. We have to conclude that the presence of consciousness in humans is not associated with certain areas of the brain.

Maybe Consciousness is divisible and with the loss of part of the brain it does not die, but is only damaged? Scientific facts do not confirm this assumption either.

Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences Voino-Yasenetsky describes: “I opened a huge abscess (about 50 cubic cm of pus) in a young wounded man, which undoubtedly destroyed the entire left frontal lobe, and I did not observe any mental defects after this operation. I can say the same about another patient who was operated on for a huge cyst of the meninges. Upon wide opening of the skull, I was surprised to see that almost the entire right half of it was empty, and the entire left hemisphere of the brain was compressed, almost to the point of being impossible to distinguish.”6

In 1940, Dr. Augustin Iturricha made a sensational statement at the Anthropological Society in Sucre (Bolivia). He and Dr. Ortiz spent a long time studying the medical history of a 14-year-old boy, a patient at Dr. Ortiz's clinic. The teenager was there with a diagnosis of a brain tumor. The young man retained Consciousness until his death, complaining only of a headache. When a pathological autopsy was performed after his death, the doctors were amazed: the entire brain mass was completely separated from the internal cavity of the skull. A large abscess has taken over the cerebellum and part of the brain. It remains completely unclear how the sick boy’s thinking was preserved.

The fact that consciousness exists independently of the brain is also confirmed by studies conducted recently by Dutch physiologists under the leadership of Pim van Lommel. The results of a large-scale experiment were published in the most authoritative English biological journal, The Lancet. “Consciousness exists even after the brain has ceased to function. In other words, Consciousness “lives” on its own, absolutely independently. As for the brain, it is not thinking matter at all, but an organ, like any other, performing strictly defined functions. It may very well be that thinking matter, even in principle, does not exist, said the leader of the study, the famous scientist Pim van Lommel” 7.

Another argument that is understandable to non-specialists is given by Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky: “In the wars of ants who do not have a brain, intentionality is clearly revealed, and therefore intelligence, no different from human”8. This is truly an amazing fact. Ants solve quite complex problems of survival, building housing, providing themselves with food, i.e. have a certain intelligence, but have no brain at all. Makes you think, doesn't it?

Neurophysiology does not stand still, but is one of the most dynamically developing sciences. The success of studying the brain is evidenced by the methods and scale of research. Functions and areas of the brain are being studied, and its composition is being clarified in more and more detail. Despite the titanic work on studying the brain, world science today is still far from understanding what creativity, thinking, memory are and what their connection is with the brain itself.

So, science has clearly established that Consciousness is not a product of brain activity.

What is the nature of Consciousness?

Having come to the understanding that Consciousness does not exist inside the body, science draws natural conclusions about the immaterial nature of consciousness.

Academician P.K. Anokhin: “None of the “mental” operations that we attribute to the “mind” have so far been able to be directly associated with any part of the brain. If we, in principle, cannot understand how exactly the psyche arises as a result of the activity of the brain, then isn’t it more logical to think that the psyche is not, in its essence, a function of the brain, but represents the manifestation of some other - immaterial spiritual forces? 9

At the end of the 20th century, the creator of quantum mechanics, Nobel Prize laureate E. Schrödinger wrote that the nature of the connection between some physical processes and subjective events (which include Consciousness) lies “aside from science and beyond human understanding.”

The greatest modern neurophysiologist, Nobel Prize winner in medicine, J. Eccles, developed the idea that based on the analysis of brain activity it is impossible to find out the origin of mental phenomena, and this fact can easily be interpreted in the sense that the psyche is not a function of the brain at all. According to Eccles, neither physiology nor the theory of evolution can shed light on the origin and nature of consciousness, which is absolutely alien to all material processes in the Universe. The spiritual world of man and the world of physical realities, including brain activity, are completely independent independent worlds that only interact and to some extent influence each other. He is echoed by such prominent specialists as Karl Lashley (an American scientist, director of the laboratory of primate biology in Orange Park (Florida), who studied the mechanisms of brain function) and Harvard University doctor Edward Tolman.

With his colleague, the founder of modern neurosurgery Wilder Penfield, who performed over 10,000 brain operations, Eccles wrote the book “The Mystery of Man”10. In it, the authors directly state that “there is no doubt that a person is controlled by SOMETHING located outside his body.” “I can confirm experimentally,” writes Eccles, “that the workings of consciousness cannot be explained by the functioning of the brain. Consciousness exists independently of it from the outside.”

Eccles is deeply convinced that consciousness cannot be the subject of scientific research. In his opinion, the emergence of consciousness, like the emergence of life, is the highest religious mystery. In his report, the Nobel laureate relied on the conclusions of the book “Personality and the Brain,” written jointly with the American philosopher and sociologist Karl Popper.

Wilder Penfield, after many years of studying brain activity, also came to the conclusion that “the energy of the mind is different from the energy of the brain’s neural impulses”11.

Academician of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the Russian Federation, Director of the Brain Research Institute (RAMS of the Russian Federation), world-renowned neurophysiologist, Doctor of Medical Sciences. Natalya Petrovna Bekhtereva: “I first heard the hypothesis that the human brain only perceives thoughts from somewhere outside from the lips of Nobel laureate, Professor John Eccles. Of course, at the time it seemed absurd to me. But then research conducted at our St. Petersburg Brain Research Institute confirmed: we cannot explain the mechanics of the creative process. The brain can generate only the simplest thoughts, such as turning the pages of a book you are reading or stirring sugar in a glass. And the creative process is the manifestation of a completely new quality. As a believer, I allow the participation of the Almighty in controlling the thought process" 12.

Science comes to the conclusion that the brain is not a source of thought and consciousness, but at most a relay of them.

Professor S. Grof talks about it this way: “imagine that your TV is broken and you call a TV technician, who, after turning various knobs, tunes it up. It doesn’t occur to you that all these stations are sitting in this box” 13.

Already in 1956, the outstanding leading scientist-surgeon, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky believed that our brain is not only not connected with Consciousness, but is not even capable of thinking independently, since the mental process is taken outside its boundaries. In his book, Valentin Feliksovich argues that “the brain is not an organ of thought and feelings,” and that “The Spirit acts beyond the brain, determining its activity, and our entire existence, when the brain works as a transmitter, receiving signals and transmitting them to the organs of the body.” 14.

English researchers Peter Fenwick from the London Institute of Psychiatry and Sam Parnia from Southampton Central Clinic came to the same conclusions. They examined patients who had come back to life after cardiac arrest and found that some of them accurately recounted the content of conversations that medical staff had while they were in a state of clinical death. Others gave an accurate description of the events that occurred during this time period. Sam Parnia argues that the brain, like any other organ of the human body, is composed of cells and is not capable of thinking. However, it can work as a thought detecting device, i.e. like an antenna, with the help of which it becomes possible to receive a signal from the outside. Scientists have suggested that during clinical death, Consciousness operating independently of the brain uses it as a screen. Like a television receiver, which first receives the waves entering it, and then converts them into sound and image.

If we turn off the radio, this does not mean that the radio station stops broadcasting. That is, after the death of the physical body, Consciousness continues to live.

The fact of the continuation of the life of Consciousness after the death of the body is also confirmed by Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Director of the Research Institute of the Human Brain, world-famous neurophysiologist N.P. Bekhterev in her book “The Magic of the Brain and the Labyrinths of Life.” In addition to discussing purely scientific issues, in this book the author also cites his personal experience of encountering posthumous phenomena.

Natalya Bekhtereva, talking about her meeting with the Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga Dimitrova, speaks quite definitely about this in one of her interviews: “Vanga’s example absolutely convinced me that there is a phenomenon of contact with the dead,” and another quote from her book: “ I can’t help but believe what I heard and saw myself. A scientist does not have the right to reject facts (if he is a scientist!) just because they do not fit into dogma or worldview”12.

The first consistent description of afterlife, based on scientific observations, was given by the Swedish scientist and naturalist Emmanuel Swedenborg. Then this problem was seriously studied by the famous psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler Ross, the equally famous psychiatrist Raymond Moody, conscientious academicians Oliver Lodge15,16, William Crooks17, Alfred Wallace, Alexander Butlerov, Professor Friedrich Myers18, and the American pediatrician Melvin Morse. Among the serious and systematic researchers of the issue of dying, Dr. Michael Sabom, a professor of medicine at Emory University and a staff physician at the Veterans Hospital in Atlanta, should be mentioned; the systematic research of psychiatrist Kenneth Ring, who studied this problem, was also studied by the doctor of medicine and resuscitator Moritz Rawlings. , our contemporary, thanatopsychologist A.A. Nalchadzhyan. The famous Soviet scientist, a leading specialist in the field of thermodynamic processes, and corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus, Albert Veinik, worked a lot to understand this problem from the point of view of physics. A significant contribution to the study of near-death experiences was made by the world famous American psychologist of Czech origin, founder of the transpersonal school of psychology, Dr. Stanislav Grof.

The variety of facts accumulated by science undeniably proves that after physical death, each of those living today inherits a different reality, preserving their Consciousness.

Despite the limitations of our ability to understand this reality using material means, today there are a number of its characteristics obtained through experiments and observations of scientists studying this problem.

These characteristics were listed by A.V. Mikheev, a researcher at the St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University in his report at the international symposium “Life after death: from faith to knowledge”, which took place on April 8-9, 2005 in St. Petersburg:

"1. There is a so-called “subtle body”, which is the carrier of self-awareness, memory, emotions and the “inner life” of a person. This body exists... after physical death, being, for the duration of the existence of the physical body, its “parallel component”, ensuring the above processes. The physical body is only an intermediary for their manifestation on the physical (earthly) level.

2. The life of an individual does not end with current earthly death. Survival after death is a natural law for humans.

3. The next reality is divided into a large number of levels, differing in the frequency characteristics of their components.

4. A person’s destination during the posthumous transition is determined by his attunement to a certain level, which is the total result of his thoughts, feelings and actions during life on Earth. Just as the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a chemical substance depends on its composition, so too a person's posthumous destination is determined by the "composite characteristic" of his inner life.

5. The concepts of “Heaven and Hell” reflect two polarities, possible post-mortem states.

6. In addition to such polar states, there are a number of intermediate ones. The choice of an adequate state is automatically determined by the mental and emotional “pattern” formed by a person during earthly life. That is why negative emotions, violence, the desire for destruction and fanaticism, no matter how they are justified externally, in this regard are extremely destructive for the future fate of a person. This provides a strong foundation for personal responsibility and ethical principles."19

And again about suicide

Most suicides believe that their Consciousness will cease to exist after death, that it will be peace, a break from life. We got acquainted with the conclusion of world science about what Consciousness is and about the lack of connection between it and the brain, as well as the fact that after the death of the body, a person will begin another, postmortem life. Moreover, Consciousness retains its qualities, memory, and its afterlife is a natural continuation of earthly life.

This means that if here, in earthly life, Consciousness was struck by some kind of pain, illness, grief, liberation from the body will not be liberation from this illness. In the afterlife, the fate of a sick consciousness is even sadder than in earthly life, because in earthly life we ​​can change everything or almost everything - with the participation of our will, the help of other people, new knowledge, changing the life situation - in another world such opportunities are absent, and therefore the state of Consciousness is more stable.

That is, suicide is the preservation of a painful, unbearable state of one’s Consciousness for an indefinite period. Quite possibly - forever. And the lack of hope for improving your condition greatly increases the painfulness of any torment.

If we really want rest and pleasant peaceful rest, then our Consciousness must achieve such a state even in earthly life, then after natural death it will retain it.

The author would like for you, after reading the material, to try to find the truth on your own, double-check the data presented in this article, and read the relevant literature from the field of medicine, psychology and neurophysiology. I hope that, having learned more about this area, you will refuse to attempt suicide or commit it only if you are confident that with the help of it you can really get rid of Consciousness.

The core of personality is that in a person that is the source of one’s own internal activity and personality. That which comes from within a person towards or against the expectations of others and life circumstances. The core is the source of personality strength.

Core and periphery of personality

What in a personality belongs to the core and what to the periphery? See Core and periphery of personality

Core - one or several?

There is no reason to assert that a person has only one personal core. A person may have several of his biological cores (innate character traits that affirm him as a person) and several that replace each other with age and the development of his culture - cultural cores. See Biological and cultural core of personality

Development of the core of personality

Core personality and self

The core of personality is those structures in a person that are the source of one’s own motives, internal activity and independence of the individual. At different stages of personality development, the core can be both biological and psychological structures. All psychological structures of the personality that perform the function of the core of the personality are called “I”.

What's in the Core?

All we know about the core is that it is from it that the impulse to confront the external environment comes. And what kind and content of this impulse, working with different people and noticing different sides, different researchers see it differently. Namely, this:

• Naturally growing positive grain (Maslow and Rogers, humanistic approach)
• Product of self-creation (existential approach of V. Frankl and J. Budgetal)
• What a person’s environment shapes (behaviorism and Soviet psychology)
• Place of inflamed conflict (classical psychoanalysis)
• Perverted movement of the spirit (Christian anthropology, Orthodox psychology)
• Innate grains of different potential, sometimes replaced by the potential of a culture of different levels ()

For a psychotherapist, Health is a Façade. And inside - Painful processes under